{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T07:49:25Z","timestamp":1790668165718,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,6]],"date-time":"2011-11-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1320537600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clinical Cardiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The utility of routine preoperative electrocardiography (ECG) for assessing perioperative cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing noncardiac, nonvascular surgery (NCNVS) is unclear.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Hypothesis:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There would be an association between preoperative ECG and perioperative cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing NCNVS.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 660 patients undergoing NCNVS were prospectively evaluated. Patients age &gt;18 years who underwent an elective, nonday case, open surgical procedure were enrolled. Troponin I concentrations and 12\u2010lead ECG were evaluated the day before surgery, immediately after surgery, and on the first 5 postoperative days. Preoperative ECG showing atrial fibrillation, left or right bundle branch block, left ventricular hypertrophy, frequent premature ventricular complexes, pacemaker rhythm, Q\u2010wave, ST\u2010segment changes, or sinus tachycardia or bradycardia were classified as abnormal. The patients were followed up during hospitalization and were evaluated for the presence of perioperative cardiovascular events (PCE).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Eighty patients (12.1%) experienced PCE. Patients with abnormal ECG findings had a greater incidence of PCE than those with normal ECG results (16% vs 6.4%;\n                      <jats:italic>P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.001). Mean QTc interval was significantly longer in the patients who had PCE (436.6 \u00b1 31.4 vs 413.3 \u00b1 16.7 ms;\n                      <jats:italic>P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.001). Univariate analysis showed a significant association between preoperative atrial fibrillation, pacemaker rhythm, ST\u2010segment changes, QTc prolongation, and in\u2010hospital PCE. However, only QTc prolongation (odds ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.06\u20101.2,\n                      <jats:italic>P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.001) was an independent predictor of PCE according to the multivariate analysis. Every 10\u2010ms increase in QTc interval was related to a 13% increase for PCE.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prolongation of the QTc interval on the preoperative ECG was related with PCE in patients undergoing NCNVS. \u00a9 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.<\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/clc.21003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,6]],"date-time":"2011-11-06T14:58:24Z","timestamp":1320591504000},"page":"494-499","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Predictive Value of Preoperative Electrocardiography for Perioperative Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac, Nonvascular Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"35","author":[{"given":"Murat","family":"Biteker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dursun","family":"Duman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmet \u0130lker","family":"Tekke\u015fin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","first-page":"e418","article-title":"ACC\/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the ACC\/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee).","volume":"116","author":"Fleisher LA","year":"2007","journal-title":"Circulation."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","first-page":"111.","article-title":"American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status.","volume":"24","year":"1963","journal-title":"Anesthesiology."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.100.10.1043"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.21.6.1160"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2008.01.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","first-page":"353","article-title":"An analysis of time relations of the electrocardiogram.","volume":"7","author":"Bazett H.","year":"1920","journal-title":"Heart."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","first-page":"694.","article-title":"Bazett's QT correction reviewed: evidence that a linear QT correction for heart rate is better.","volume":"1","author":"Hodges M","year":"1983","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehm355"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197710202971601"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0741-5214(97)70054-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200001203420304"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1532-5415.2002.t01-1-50303.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2005.10.058"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9149(91)90099-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/euhj.1998.1276"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.101.1.61"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.050316"}],"container-title":["Clinical Cardiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fclc.21003","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/clc.21003","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,21]],"date-time":"2023-11-21T05:50:54Z","timestamp":1700545854000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/clc.21003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,6]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/clc.21003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/clc.21003","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0160-9289","1932-8737"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0160-9289","type":"print"},{"value":"1932-8737","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,6]]}}}