{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,15]],"date-time":"2024-09-15T10:36:17Z","timestamp":1726396577262},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,30]],"date-time":"2008-10-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1225324800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostic Cytopathology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The value of repeat cytology in the detection of high\u2010grade preinvasive or invasive disease was analyzed at the time of colposcopy in cases of patients with abnormal referral cytology. A series of 136 patients with squamous abnormalities in their referral cytology, who had undergone repeat cytology and for whom outcome had been established, were included in the study. Final diagnosis consisted of 27 negative results (20%), 37 cases of CIN1 (27%), 31 CIN2 (23%), 39 CIN3 (29%), and 2 (1%) cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Referral and repeat cytology suggestive of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high\u2010grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC\u2010H), high\u2010grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were findings significantly associated with a final diagnosis of CIN2 or worse. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of repeat cytology for the histological diagnosis of significant histological neoplasia (CIN2 or worse) were 81.9% and 77.6%, respectively. In women with referral cytology findings of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low\u2010grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC\u2010US\/LSIL), repeat cytology was suggestive of HSIL in 20% of cases (11\/54), and in 4% (2\/54) biopsy was negative or CIN1, and the final diagnosis established by LLETZ was CIN3. Eight cases (10%) of HSIL in referral and repeat cytology in which biopsies were negative or insufficient were diagnosed as CIN3 or worse in the final diagnosis. Repeat cytology would have changed therapeutic management in 4 and 10%, respectively, of patients included as ASC\u2010US\/LSIL and ASC\u2010H\/HSIL in referral cytology. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009. \u00a9 2008 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.20976","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,30]],"date-time":"2008-10-30T20:50:22Z","timestamp":1225399822000},"page":"68-73","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Usefulness of repeat cytology at the time of first colposcopy"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Rosane Ribeiro Figueiredo","family":"Alves","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Silvia Helena","family":"Rabelo\u2010Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrea Alves","family":"Ribeiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Megmar Aparecida dos Santos","family":"Carneiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yara","family":"Ximenes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Suelene Brito do Nascimento","family":"Tavares","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vera","family":"Saddi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luiz Carlos","family":"Zeferino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a117485"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","first-page":"4","article-title":"Barriers to adoption of recent technology in cervical screening","volume":"16","author":"Jhala D","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cytojournal"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)67961-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-1702(02)00194-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.2840090608"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000327183"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","first-page":"815","article-title":"Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears","volume":"34","author":"Wheelock JB","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00488.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000326867"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1997.4829"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0339(199804)18:4<317::AID-DC14>3.0.CO;2-M"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","first-page":"475","article-title":"A second Pap smear during colposcopy: Is it really worth it?","volume":"25","author":"Kourounis GS","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.21065"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2005.10.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-6413-1-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_2","first-page":"36","volume-title":"World Health Organization\u2014International histological classification of tumors","author":"Scully RE","year":"1994"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/modpathol.3800723"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_2","first-page":"484","article-title":"Overcoming barriers to adherence to HPV vaccination recommendations","volume":"12","author":"Dempsey AF","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Manag Care"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1438.2007.00899.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2007.00478.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e318159408b"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00004347-199304000-00018"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_2","first-page":"12","volume-title":"Colposcopy: Management options","author":"Prendiville W","year":"2005"}],"container-title":["Diagnostic Cytopathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fdc.20976","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/dc.20976","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T16:10:08Z","timestamp":1700064608000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/dc.20976"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,30]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/dc.20976"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/dc.20976","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["8755-1039","1097-0339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"8755-1039","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-0339","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,10,30]]}}}