{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T08:02:14Z","timestamp":1759564934357},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]],"date-time":"2010-11-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1288656000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostic Cytopathology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Reporting rates for glandular neoplasia in 464,754 cervical samples reported at six laboratories in 12\u2010month periods before and after the implementation of Surepath\u2122 LBC processing are compared. The introduction of LBC processing is seen to have resulted in a significant (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.001) increase in the detection rate for endocervical glandular neoplasia (from 2.2 per 10,000 tests to 3.9 per 10,000) while maintaining high levels of reporting specificity. An observed fall in the number of samples reported as showing borderline glandular neoplasia falls short of statistical significance, and the reporting of possible endometrial and \u2018other\u2019 glandular abnormalities appears to be unaffected. The underlying reasons for the observed improvement in detection of endocervical glandular neoplasia are discussed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2011. \u00a9 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.21471","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,3]],"date-time":"2010-11-03T04:54:30Z","timestamp":1288760070000},"page":"869-874","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Glandular neoplasia and borderline endocervical reporting rates before and after conversion to the SurePath<sup>TM<\/sup> liquid\u2010based cytology (LBC) system"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Burnley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Dudding","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Parker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Parsons","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C. J.","family":"Whitaker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"W.","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","first-page":"20","article-title":"Case report of primary peritoneal papillary serous adenocarcinoma","volume":"18","author":"Ramaiya A","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cytopathology"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2008.00585.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","first-page":"199","article-title":"Cancer of the uterine cervix in Norway by histological type, 1970\u201384","volume":"79","author":"Eide TJ","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/096914139700400112"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/25.2.252"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19930815)72:4<1281::AID-CNCR2820720421>3.0.CO;2-P"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<53::AID-CNCR2820650112>3.0.CO;2-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0339(199806)18:6<393::AID-DC2>3.0.CO;2-A"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","unstructured":"Department of Health Statistical Bulletin Cervical Screening Programme England 2002\u20132003.Statistics on cervical cancer and the NHS cervical screening programme 1993\u20132003 London England Oct.2003."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","unstructured":"Department of Health Statistical Bulletin Cervical Screening Programme England 2006\u20132007.Statistics on cervical cancer and the NHS cervical screening programme 1997\u20132007 London England Oct.2007."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00063-W"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.20782"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","unstructured":"MossSM GrayA MarteauT LegoodR HenstockE MaissiE.Evaluation of HPV\/LBC cervical screening pilot studies. Report to the Department of Health London England Oct.2004."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","first-page":"270","article-title":"How accurate is cytological diagnosis of cervical glandular lesions?","volume":"36","author":"Moreira MAR","year":"2008","journal-title":"Diagn Pathol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00339.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0339(200007)23:1<19::AID-DC4>3.0.CO;2-K"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000330872"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00392_13_11.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2007.00500_5.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00392_10_1.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.20999"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00392_12_4.x","article-title":"Endometrial carcinoma detected with SurePath liquid based cervical cytology. Comparison with conventional cytology","volume":"17","author":"Patel CJ","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cytopathology"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_2","first-page":"17","article-title":"Comparison of the efficacy of the cervex brush and the extended tip wooden spatula with conventional cytology: A longitudinal study","volume":"5","author":"Whitaker CJ","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cytojournal"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2007.00454.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00128360-200307000-00003"}],"container-title":["Diagnostic Cytopathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fdc.21471","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/dc.21471","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,21]],"date-time":"2023-11-21T19:34:31Z","timestamp":1700595271000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/dc.21471"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/dc.21471"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/dc.21471","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["8755-1039","1097-0339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"8755-1039","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-0339","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]]}}}