{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T03:49:30Z","timestamp":1791431370901,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]],"date-time":"2026-09-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789862400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":19,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ecology and Evolution"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential source of formative feedback for student writing. However, relatively little is known about how AI\u2010generated feedback compares with instructor and peer feedback across different Writing\u2010to\u2010Learn (WTL) assignments implemented in authentic undergraduate biology classrooms. This exploratory study compared AI (specifically ChatGPT\u20105), peer, and instructor feedback across infographic and academic explanatory article assignments implemented in three undergraduate biology courses representing diverse student populations. Agreement among feedback sources was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), while student perceptions of feedback usefulness, trust, engagement, and effort were assessed using Likert\u2010scale survey data. Agreement between AI and instructor feedback varied according to assignment modality, disciplinary context, and revision stage. AI demonstrated moderate agreement with instructor feedback during the draft stage, but agreement frequently diverged following student revision, particularly for higher\u2010order rubric criteria such as content accuracy and disciplinary reasoning. Agreement was consistently stronger for academic explanatory articles than for infographics. Students perceived instructor feedback as more useful and trustworthy than either peer or AI feedback, whereas the effort required to apply feedback did not differ across feedback sources. AI feedback was generally perceived similarly to peer feedback. Collectively, these findings suggest that AI is best used as a formative, early\u2010stage scaffold within WTL assignments rather than as a summative evaluation tool. When integrated into structured instructional workflows alongside instructor and peer feedback, large language models can support student revision while preserving the central role of instructor expertise in undergraduate biology education.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ece3.74365","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T01:46:57Z","timestamp":1789955217000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Evaluating Artificial Intelligence, Peer, and Instructor Feedback Across Scientific Communication Assignments in Undergraduate Biology"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4690-0368","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lori","family":"Boies","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"St. Mary's University  San Antonio Texas USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1152\/advan.00138.2012"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","first-page":"E6","article-title":"Science Communication to the General Public: Why we Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training","volume":"12","author":"Brownell S. E.","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2005.02.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jee.70024"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.13558"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543070003287"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1187\/cbe.21\u201009\u20100285"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/07410883241263542"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","unstructured":"Gamer M. J.Lemon andI. F. P.Singh.2019.\u201cirr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.\u201dhttps:\/\/cran.r\u2010project.org\/web\/packages\/irr\/index.html."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1152\/advan.00071.2015"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","first-page":"15","article-title":"Do Students Want and Need Written Feedback on Summative Assignments? Engaging Students With the Feedback Process \u2013 A Topic Review Activity","volume":"3","author":"Giles T. M.","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ergo"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.10016"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2025.2502582"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_17_1","first-page":"244","volume-title":"Artificial Intelligence in Education Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning","author":"Holmes W.","year":"2019"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10437797.2015.977177"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_19_1","unstructured":"Kassambara A.2026.\u201crstatix: Pipe\u2010Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests.\u201dR Package Version 1.1.0.https:\/\/rpkgs.datanovia.com\/rstatix\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2505\/4\/jcst17_046_04_76"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_21_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence","author":"Liew P. Y.","year":"2025"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-16450-2_10"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1082\u2010989X.1.1.30"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.20343\/teachlearninqu.4.2.11"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10742\u2010022\u201000293\u20109"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10791\u2010025\u201009830\u20109"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_27_1","volume-title":"R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing","author":"R Core Team","year":"2024"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_28_1","unstructured":"Revelle W.2026.\u201cpsych: Procedures for Psychological Psychometric and Personality Research.\u201dNorthwestern University. R Package Version 2.6.4.https:\/\/CRAN.R\u2010project.org\/package=psych."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1187\/cbe.11\u201008\u20100064"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_30_1","volume-title":"RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R","author":"RStudio Team","year":"2024"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shin I. S. B.Hwang Y. J.Yoo S.Bae andR. Y.Kim.2025.\u201cComparing Student Preferences for AI\u2010Generated and Peer\u2010Generated Feedback in AI\u2010Driven Formative Peer Assessment.\u201dIn: Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. Association for Computing Machinery pp. 159\u201369.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3706468.3706488.","DOI":"10.1145\/3706468.3706488"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_32_1","unstructured":"Tossell C. N.Tenhundfeld A.Momen K.Cooley andE.den.d.Visser.\u201cStudent Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in a College Essay Assignment: Implications for Learning Grading and Trust in Artificial Intelligence.\u201dAccessed April 10 2026.https:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/abstract\/document\/10400910."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_33_1","unstructured":"Wickham H.2024.\u201ctidyverse: Easily Install and Load the Tidyverse.\u201dhttps:\/\/CRAN.R\u2010project.org\/package=tidyverse."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.20008"}],"container-title":["Ecology and Evolution"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ece3.74365","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ece3.74365","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ece3.74365","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T02:52:17Z","timestamp":1791427937000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ece3.74365"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ece3.74365"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ece3.74365","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-7758","2045-7758"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-7758","type":"print"},{"value":"2045-7758","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-11","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-09-09","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-09-20","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"e74365"}}