{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T17:38:39Z","timestamp":1790617119667,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"S1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]],"date-time":"2010-11-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1290556800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Economics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>New contraceptive methods provide greater choice in terms of effectiveness, management of side\u2010effects, convenience and frequency of administration and flexibility, but make the decisions about contraception more complex. There are limited data on the factors that determine women's choices among these alternatives, to inform providers about the factors which are most important to women, or to predict uptake of new products. This paper reports on a choice experiment designed to elicit women's preferences in relation to prescribed contraception and to forecast the impact of the introduction of two new products into the Australian market. A generalised multinomial logit model is estimated and used in the simulation exercise. The model forecasts that the hormonal patch would be well received among women, achieving a greater market share than current non\u2010pill products, but the vaginal ring would have limited appeal. Copyright \u00a9 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.1686","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]],"date-time":"2010-11-24T13:24:25Z","timestamp":1290605065000},"page":"35-52","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Preferences for new and existing contraceptive products"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Denzil G.","family":"Fiebig","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephanie","family":"Knox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosalie","family":"Viney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marion","family":"Haas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Deborah J.","family":"Street","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_10_2_1","volume-title":"Australian Historical Population Statistics","author":"ABS","year":"2006"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-4076(98)00057-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2354.2008.00504.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/mksc.1090.0508"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.03.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_7_1","unstructured":"GrayE McDonaldP. 2007.Contraceptive practice and the reproductive life course. HILDA Survey Research Conference Melbourne."},{"key":"e_1_2_10_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2005.09.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2007.11.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_10_1","volume-title":"Orthogonal Arrays","author":"Kuhfeld WF","year":"2006"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1755-5345(13)70025-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00514-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/003465398557735"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11096-006-9068-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470148563"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_16_1","unstructured":"Terris\u2010PrestholtF.2009.Will microbicide introduction affect condom use? Analysis of a discrete choice experiment among urban South African women. iHEA 7th World Congress Beijing China."},{"key":"e_1_2_10_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511753930"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_18_1","first-page":"734","article-title":"Patterns of contraceptive use in Australia: analysis of the 2001 National Health Survey","volume":"39","author":"Yusuf F","year":"2007","journal-title":"Journal of Biological Science"}],"container-title":["Health Economics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fhec.1686","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/hec.1686","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,16]],"date-time":"2023-09-16T19:26:55Z","timestamp":1694892415000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/hec.1686"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/hec.1686"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hec.1686","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1057-9230","1099-1050"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1057-9230","type":"print"},{"value":"1099-1050","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]]}}}