{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T10:20:53Z","timestamp":1784542853016,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2001,5,25]],"date-time":"2001-05-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":990748800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Hydrological Processes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,6,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>For the period from 1958 to 1996, streamflow characteristics of a highly urbanized watershed were compared with less\u2010urbanized and non\u2010urbanized watersheds within a 20 000 km<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> region in the vicinity of Atlanta, Georgia: in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge physiographic provinces of the southeastern USA. Water levels in several wells completed in surficial and crystalline\u2010rock aquifers were also evaluated. Data were analysed for seven US Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauges, 17 National Weather Service rain gauges, and five USGS monitoring wells. Annual runoff coefficients (RCs; runoff as a fractional percentage of precipitation) for the urban stream (Peachtree Creek) were not significantly greater than for the less\u2010urbanized watersheds. The RCs for some streams were similar to others and the similar streams were grouped according to location. The RCs decreased from the higher elevation and higher relief watersheds to the lower elevation and lower relief watersheds: values were 0\u00b754 for the two Blue Ridge streams, 0\u00b737 for the four middle Piedmont streams (near Atlanta), and 0\u00b728 for a southern Piedmont stream. For the 25 largest stormflows, the peak flows for Peachtree Creek were 30% to 100% greater than peak flows for the other streams. The storm recession period for the urban stream was 1\u20132 days less than that for the other streams and the recession was characterized by a 2\u2010day storm recession constant that was, on average, 40 to 100% greater, i.e. streamflow decreased more rapidly than for the other streams. Baseflow recession constants ranged from 35 to 40% lower for Peachtree Creek than for the other streams; this is attributed to lower evapotranspiration losses, which result in a smaller change in groundwater storage than in the less\u2010urbanized watersheds. Low flow of Peachtree Creek ranged from 25 to 35% less than the other streams, possibly the result of decreased infiltration caused by the more efficient routing of stormwater and the paving of groundwater recharge areas. The timing of daily or monthly groundwater\u2010level fluctuations was similar annually in each well, reflecting the seasonal recharge. Although water\u2010level monitoring only began in the 1980s for the two urban wells, water levels displayed a notable decline compared with non\u2010urban wells since then; this is attributed to decreased groundwater recharge in the urban watersheds due to increased imperviousness and related rapid storm runoff. Copyright \u00a9 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/hyp.218","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,8,25]],"date-time":"2002-08-25T20:40:11Z","timestamp":1030308011000},"page":"1441-1457","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":401,"title":["Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta area (Georgia, USA): a comparative hydrological approach"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Seth","family":"Rose","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norman E.","family":"Peters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2001,5,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01944369608975688"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Atlanta Regional Commission2000a. Population of the Atlanta Region: 1900\u20131999.http:\/\/www.atlantaregional.com\/regional_data\/99tables_and_charts\/pop99tb1.html[29 September 2000]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"Atlanta Regional Commission2000b. Population density 1999.http:\/\/www.atlantaregional.com\/movers\/about_region.html[29 September 2000]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02626669409492753"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"CarterRF StilesHR.1983. Average annual rainfall and runoff in Georgia 1941\u20131970.Georgia Geologic Survey Atlas9."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(94)02640-W"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","first-page":"171","volume-title":"U.S. Geological Survey Open\u2010File Report","author":"Cressler AM","year":"1999"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","first-page":"506","volume-title":"Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology","author":"Domenico PA","year":"1998"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(89)90017-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"EarthInfo Inc.1996. EarthInfo CD2Reference Manual.USGS Daily Values. CD\u2010ROM."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005064307862"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","first-page":"3","volume-title":"Groundwater in the Urban Environment","author":"Foster S","year":"1999"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","first-page":"78","article-title":"Groundwater regions of the United States","volume":"2242","author":"Heath RC","year":"1984","journal-title":"U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(90)90131-G"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0043-1354(88)90045-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","first-page":"69","volume-title":"Processes in Physical and Human Geography","author":"Kirkby M","year":"1975"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2166\/wst.1994.0645","article-title":"Urban drainage: review of contemporary approaches","volume":"29","author":"Marsalek J","year":"1994","journal-title":"Water Science and Technology"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","first-page":"814","volume-title":"Hydrologic Analysis and Design","author":"McCuen RH","year":"1998"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1029\/96EO00306"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1085(19990215)13:2<139::AID-HYP703>3.0.CO;2-E"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1029\/JZ066i004p01203"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","first-page":"279","article-title":"Evaluation of stream water quality in Atlanta, Georgia and the surrounding region (USA)","volume":"259","author":"Peters NE","year":"1999","journal-title":"IAHS\u2010AISH Publication"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005082332332"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(93)90192-C"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(95)02767-X"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","first-page":"100","article-title":"The importance of imperviousness","volume":"1","author":"Scheuler TR","year":"1994","journal-title":"Watershed Protection Technology"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0169-7722(88)90040-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","first-page":"569","volume-title":"Hydrology in Practice","author":"Shaw EM","year":"1994"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","unstructured":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency MRLC NLCD 2000.http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/mrlc\/nlcd.html[29 September 2000]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_1","unstructured":"USGS 1\u2010degree DEMs.2000.http:\/\/edcwww.cr.usgs.gov\/doc\/edchome\/ndcdb\/ndcdb.html[21 September 2000]."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0045-6535(98)00186-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.2166\/wst.1994.0662","article-title":"Rainfall\u2010runoff modelling of partly urbanized watersheds: comparison between a distributed model using GIS and other models sensitivity analysis","volume":"29","author":"Zech Y","year":"1994","journal-title":"Water Science and Technology"}],"container-title":["Hydrological Processes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fhyp.218","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/hyp.218","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,19]],"date-time":"2023-11-19T18:57:08Z","timestamp":1700420228000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/hyp.218"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2001,5,25]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,6,15]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/hyp.218"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hyp.218","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0885-6087","1099-1085"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0885-6087","type":"print"},{"value":"1099-1085","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2001,5,25]]}}}