{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T20:40:55Z","timestamp":1791232855805,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]],"date-time":"2013-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1364774400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,15]],"date-time":"2013-02-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1360886400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>Lemna spp. are the standard test species representing aquatic macrophytes in the current risk assessment schemes for herbicides and plant growth regulators in the European Union and North America. At a Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) 2008 workshop on Aquatic Macrophyte Risk Assessment for Pesticides (AMRAP), a Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) working group was formed to address uncertainties about the sensitivity of Lemna spp. relative to other aquatic macrophyte species. For 11 herbicides and 3 fungicides for which relevant and reliable data were found for at least 6 macrophyte species, SSDs were fitted using lognormal regression. The positions of L. gibba (the most commonly tested Lemna species) and Myriophyllum spicatum (for which standardized test methods are under development) in each SSD were determined where data were available. The sensitivity of standard algal test species required for pesticide registration in the United States under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) relative to the macrophytes in each SSD was also examined (algae were not included in the SSD). L. gibba was among the most sensitive macrophyte species for approximately 50% of the chemicals examined. M. spicatum was among the most sensitive macrophytes for approximately 25% of the chemicals. In most cases, the lowest FIFRA algal species endpoint was lower than the most sensitive macrophyte endpoint. Although no single species consistently represented the most sensitive aquatic plant species, for 12 of 14 chemicals L. gibba and the FIFRA algae included an endpoint near or below the 5th percentile of the macrophyte SSD. For the other compounds, M. spicatum was the most sensitive species of all aquatic plants considered. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2013; 9: 308\u2013318. \u00a9 2012 SETAC<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ieam.1387","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,10]],"date-time":"2012-12-10T21:20:32Z","timestamp":1355174432000},"page":"308-318","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["The relative sensitivity of macrophyte and algal species to herbicides and fungicides: An analysis using species sensitivity distributions"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Jeffrey M","family":"Giddings","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Compliance Services International, 61 Cross Road, Rochester, Massachusetts 02770, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gertie","family":"Arts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Udo","family":"Hommen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fraunhofer Institute, Schmallenberg, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1006\/eesa.1999.1869","article-title":"Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions","volume":"46","author":"Aldenberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ecotoxicol Environ Saf"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envpol.2007.07.019","article-title":"Sensitivity of submersed freshwater macrophytes and endpoints in laboratory toxicity tests","volume":"153","author":"Arts","year":"2008","journal-title":"Environ Pollut"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib3","first-page":"140","article-title":"Aquatic effect assessment for plant protection products","author":"Brock","year":"2011","journal-title":"Dutch proposal that addresses the requirements of the Plant Protection Regulation and Water Framework Directive. Alterra-report 2235."},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib4","first-page":"124","volume-title":"Ecological risks of pesticides in freshwater ecosystems. Part 1: Herbicides. Alterra-Report 088","author":"Brock","year":"2000"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib5","volume-title":"Guidance document on Higher-tier Aquatic Risk Assessment for Pesticides (HARAP)","author":"Campbell","year":"1999"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib6","author":"[EC] European Commission","year":"1997"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib7","author":"[EC] European Commission","year":"2009"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib8","author":"[EC] European Commission","year":"2011"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/s002449900196","article-title":"Comparative sensitivity of Selenastrum capricornutum and Lemna minor to sixteen herbicides","volume":"32","author":"Fairchild","year":"1997","journal-title":"Arch Environ Contam Toxicol"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1830","DOI":"10.1002\/etc.5620170924","article-title":"Comparative sensitivity of five species of macrophytes and six species of algae to Atrazine, metribuzin, alachlor, and metolachlor","volume":"17","author":"Fairchild","year":"1998","journal-title":"Environ Toxicol Chem"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib11","author":"Hart","year":"2006"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib12","year":"2009"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1641\/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;2","article-title":"Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues","volume":"51","author":"Limpert","year":"2001","journal-title":"Bioscience"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib14","volume-title":"Aquatic macrophyte risk assessment for pesticides","author":"Maltby","year":"2010"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1897\/04-025R.1","article-title":"Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems","volume":"24","author":"Maltby","year":"2005","journal-title":"Environ Toxicol Chem"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7556","DOI":"10.1021\/es901461c","article-title":"Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: Importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime","volume":"43","author":"Maltby","year":"2009","journal-title":"Environ Sci Technol"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2011.05.057","article-title":"Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides","volume":"415","author":"Nienstedt","year":"2012","journal-title":"Sci Total Environ"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib18","first-page":"616","author":"Posthuma","year":"2002"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib19","author":"Rodney","year":"2008"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib20","first-page":"92","volume-title":"Overview of the ecological risk assessment process in the Office of Pesticide Programs","author":"[USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency","year":"2004"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib21","author":"[USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency","year":"2011"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib22","author":"[USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency","year":"2011"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib23","author":"[USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency","year":"2012"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1080\/10807030500430559","article-title":"Predictive value of species sensitivity distributions for effects of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems","volume":"12","author":"Van den Brink","year":"2006","journal-title":"Human Ecol Risk Assess"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib25","author":"Van Vlaardingen","year":"2004"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib26","volume-title":"Guidance for the derivation of environmental risk limits within the framework of \u201cInternational and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands\u201d (INS). National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). RIVM Report 601782001\/2007","author":"Van Vlaardingen","year":"2007"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1007\/s10750-006-0185-1","article-title":"Evaluating the necessity of additional aquatic plant testing by comparing the sensitivities of different species","volume":"570","author":"Vervliet-Scheebaum","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hydrobiologia"},{"key":"2025010718045412900_bib28","first-page":"1006","volume-title":"Limnology: Lake and river ecosystems","author":"Wetzel","year":"2001","edition":"3rd ed"}],"container-title":["Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fieam.1387","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ieam\/article-pdf\/9\/2\/308\/59405378\/1387.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ieam\/article-pdf\/9\/2\/308\/59405378\/1387.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,7]],"date-time":"2025-01-07T18:42:04Z","timestamp":1736275324000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/ieam\/article\/9\/2\/308\/7741133"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ieam.1387","relation":{},"ISSN":["1551-3777","1551-3793"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1551-3777","type":"print"},{"value":"1551-3793","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-07-17","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2012-11-26","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-02-15","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}