{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T03:55:02Z","timestamp":1791431702765,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,13]],"date-time":"2017-10-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1507852800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,13]],"date-time":"2017-10-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1507852800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To study the correlation between M2 tumor\u2010associated macrophages (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s) and invasion patterns in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) tissues.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In the present observational study, two commercial\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      tissue microarrays were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CD<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      163\u2010positive cells in a cervical\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      tissue microarray were identified. Tissue samples were stratified into groups based on a pushing border pattern (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PBP<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ), a diffuse infiltration pattern (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DIP<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ), or non\u2010tumorous tissues included as a control group; M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      numbers and distributions were compared.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The microarrays included 109 cervical\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      samples and 45 non\u2010tumorous control samples. The mean number of intratumoral M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s in cervical\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      tissue samples (35.8\u00a0\u00b1\u00a028.3) was significantly higher than the number of intraepithelial M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s in non\u2010tumorous cervical samples (1.2\u00a0\u00b1\u00a03.6) (\n                      <jats:italic>P&lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.001); similarly, the number of peritumoral M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s in cervical\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      (44.7\u00a0\u00b1\u00a029.4) was higher than in non\u2010tumorous cervical tissues (10.4\u00a0\u00b1\u00a09.2) (\n                      <jats:italic>P&lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.001). The numbers of intratumoral (\n                      <jats:italic>P=<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.046) and peritumoral (\n                      <jats:italic>P=<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.002) M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s were higher among the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DIP<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group compared with the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PBP<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A close relationship was identified between M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s and invasion patterns in cervical\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      . Further, M2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">TAM<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      infiltration was more pronounced in\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DIP<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      compared with\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PBP SCC<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      tissue samples.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12320","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,8]],"date-time":"2017-09-08T06:55:58Z","timestamp":1504853758000},"page":"346-351","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Associations between intratumoral and peritumoral M2 macrophage counts and cervical squamous cell carcinoma invasion patterns"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"139","author":[{"given":"Yuan","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Linfen People's Hospital  Linfen Shanxi China"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ningxia Medical University  Yinchuan Ningxia China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gaosheng","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology Department of Pathology Xijing Hospital Fourth Military Medical University  Xi'an Shaanxi China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shaohua","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ningxia Medical University  Yinchuan Ningxia China"},{"name":"Department of Gynecology The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical College  Xi'an Shaanxi China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.08.025"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)02250-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0366-6999.161372"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cas.12314"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biocel.2014.06.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.canlet.2013.01.042"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1471-4906(02)02302-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1479-5876-9-216"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/path.2370"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2001-14793"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.05.046"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2012.11.035"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440080101032"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","first-page":"176","volume-title":"WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs","author":"Stoler M","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/nrc1075"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lungcan.2011.04.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers6031670"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-12-35"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9440(10)64255-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1590\/S1807-59322010000600003","article-title":"Local lymphocytes and nitric oxide synthase in the uterine cervical stroma of patients with grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"65","author":"Silva CS","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clinics"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","first-page":"458","volume-title":"The Macrophage","author":"Kreutz M","year":"2002"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0023902"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fijgo.12320","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12320","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.12320","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12320","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T03:43:49Z","timestamp":1791431029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.12320"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,13]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.12320"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12320","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,13]]}}}