{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T20:22:03Z","timestamp":1790713323790,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,18]],"date-time":"2018-01-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1516233600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To determine the accuracy of the posterior cervical angle (PCA) compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting the outcome of induction of labor (IOL).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>The present prospective observational study included IOL candidates who had their PCA and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Kasr El\u2010Aini Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, between April 1 and July 31, 2017. The accuracy of these tests in predicting successful IOL (defined as vaginal delivery) was\u00a0compared.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The analysis included 49 women with successful IOL and 21 women with unsuccessful IOL. The suggested cutoffs for the prediction of successful IOL were a PCA of more than 99.5\u00b0, a cervical length of less than 34\u00a0mm, and a Bishop score of more than five. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for these three measures were not significantly different. However, a PCA of more than 99.5\u00b0 had the best sensitivity (91.84%), specificity (90.48), positive predictive value (95.7%), negative predictive value (82.6%), positive likelihood ratio (9.64), and negative likelihood ratio (0.09) compared with the other two predictors.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>A PCA of more than 99.5\u00b0 yielded the best accuracy in predicting successful IOL compared with the cervical length and the Bishop score.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>ClinicalTrials.gov<\/jats:title><jats:p>NCT03113227.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12425","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,10]],"date-time":"2017-12-10T07:52:39Z","timestamp":1512892359000},"page":"102-107","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"141","author":[{"given":"Akram M.","family":"Al\u2010Adwy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sherin M.","family":"Sobh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Doaa S.","family":"Belal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eman F.","family":"Omran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amr","family":"Hassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed H.","family":"Saad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mai M.","family":"Afifi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adel M.","family":"Nada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine Cairo University  Cairo Egypt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318253d7aa"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","article-title":"Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"206","author":"Laughon SK","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119643"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13411"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1331024"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","first-page":"Cd010762","article-title":"Methods for assessing pre\u2010induction cervical ripening","author":"Ezebialu IU","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00765.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.22229"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","first-page":"35","article-title":"Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bishop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor: The effect of parity","volume":"36","author":"Tan PC","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.050"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3769-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.954538","article-title":"Can measurement of cervical length, fetal head position and posterior cervical angle be an alternative method to Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction?","volume":"28","author":"Gokturk U","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","first-page":"3511","article-title":"Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables","volume":"29","author":"Prado CA","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","first-page":"172","article-title":"Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: Comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination","volume":"76","author":"Sonek JD","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop EH","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","volume-title":"WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour","author":"World Health Organization (WHO)","year":"2011"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"S83","article-title":"Sensitivity, specificity, receiver\u2010operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: Communicating the performance of diagnostic tests","volume":"29","author":"Florkowski CM","year":"2008","journal-title":"The Clin Biochem Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fijgo.12425","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12425","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,25]],"date-time":"2023-09-25T07:21:06Z","timestamp":1695626466000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.12425"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,18]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.12425"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12425","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,18]]}}}