{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T14:29:12Z","timestamp":1792592952119,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,22]],"date-time":"2018-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1521676800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the usefulness of endocervical curettage (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content>) during loop electrosurgical excision procedures (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LEEP<\/jats:styled-content>s) in predicting the risk of persistence\/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+) and informing clinical decision\u2010making after <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LEEP<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>The present retrospective study included women undergoing <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LEEP<\/jats:styled-content> for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+ at a teaching hospital in Chile between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014. Demographic, pathologic, and follow\u2010up data were collected. Associations between predictors and treatment failure (persistent\/recurrent disease) were examined; a Cox model was used to assess the effects of different variables on the failure rate.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The analysis included 330 women with a mean follow\u2010up of 29.4\u00a0months; 188 women underwent <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content> at the time of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LEEP<\/jats:styled-content>. On multivariate analysis, a positive <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content> was the only variable significantly associated with persistence\/recurrence (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.001). In the Cox model, positive <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content> (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.001) and positive margins (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.009) were independently associated with higher failure rates. When faced with positive <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content> findings, clinicians tended to perform additional treatment instead of advising follow\u2010up.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Positive findings from <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content> performed during <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LEEP<\/jats:styled-content> were a better predictor of persistent\/recurrent disease than margin status, after adjusting the individual variable effect in the Cox modelling. The performance of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ECC<\/jats:styled-content> is recommended during any <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LEEP<\/jats:styled-content> performed for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CIN<\/jats:styled-content>2+; in particular, it should never be omitted if endocervical disease is suspected.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12480","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,6]],"date-time":"2018-03-06T18:02:39Z","timestamp":1520359359000},"page":"337-343","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["The value of endocervical curettage during loop electrosurgical excision procedures in predicting persistent\/recurrent preinvasive cervical disease"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"141","author":[{"given":"Mauricio A.","family":"Cuello","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica de Chile  Santiago Chile"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mar\u00eda E.","family":"Espinosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica de Chile  Santiago Chile"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elisa J.","family":"Orlandini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica de Chile  Santiago Chile"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Du Y.","family":"Hwang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica de Chile  Santiago Chile"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182883a34"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001136"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/S1516-31802012000200009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.07.026"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109937"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4067\/s0717-75262017000500539"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000276"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2017.01.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e3181fee61d"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-015-1748-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(11)70078-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","first-page":"22","volume-title":"Gu\u00edas Cl\u00ednicas AUGE: C\u00e1ncer C\u00e9rvico Uterino","author":"MINSAL","year":"2015"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-113773"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","first-page":"1344","article-title":"Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization","volume":"88","author":"Natee J","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.12.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2006.12.036"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"104","article-title":"Should endocervical excision and curettage be done during LEEP?","volume":"18","author":"Prevost MR","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prp.2016.12.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000012"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2016.27.e3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e31828543c5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12960"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","unstructured":"WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention Geneva 2013."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fijgo.12480","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12480","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T13:27:22Z","timestamp":1695475642000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.12480"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,22]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.12480"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12480","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-10-19","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-03-01","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-03-22","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}