{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T23:07:34Z","timestamp":1787612854055,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,11]],"date-time":"2019-04-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554940800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare TCu380Ag and TCu380A intrauterine contraceptive devices after 1\u00a0year of use.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted among healthy married women aged 20\u201335\u00a0years who attended the family planning clinics of three tertiary centers in India between August 1, 2015, to March 31, 2018. The TCu380Ag group (n=300) received one of three sizes of this device depending on uterocervical length: maxi (8.0\u20139.0\u00a0cm), normal (7.0\u20138.5\u00a0cm), or mini (6.0\u20137.5\u00a0cm). The remaining 300 participants received TCu380A. Follow\u2010up was conducted at 3\u2010monthly intervals to assess continuation rate, acceptability, efficacy, adverse effects, and complications.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The TCu380Ag group had a higher continuation rate than the TCu380A group at 1\u00a0year (84.0% vs 75.8%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.01), with an efficacy of 99.6% versus 100.0% (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&gt;0.05). Overall estimated continuation rates were 94.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.7%\u201396.4%) and 88.4% (95% CI 83.2%\u201391.5%), respectively (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.026). Use of TCu380Ag was associated with fewer adverse effects (heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal pain, or expulsion) when compared with TCu380A (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&gt;0.05 for all comparisons). Discontinuation rates owing to adverse effects were 6.59% for TCu380Ag versus 13.26% for TCu380A (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>=0.01).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Varying sizes of TCu380Ag could provide an alternative to TCu380A.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12809","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,28]],"date-time":"2019-03-28T06:47:01Z","timestamp":1553755621000},"page":"268-277","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["A 1\u2010year comparison of <scp>TC<\/scp>u380Ag versus <scp>TC<\/scp>u380A intrauterine contraceptive devices in India"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"145","author":[{"given":"Alka","family":"Kriplani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology All India Institute of Medical Sciences  New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rohini","family":"Sehgal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology All India Institute of Medical Sciences  New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiralal","family":"Konar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital  Kolkata India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Achanta","family":"Vivekanand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences  Karimnagar India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Perumal","family":"Vanamail","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology All India Institute of Medical Sciences  New Delhi India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chittaranjan N.","family":"Purandare","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Indian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Purandare Hospital  Mumbai India"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(88)90046-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.09.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(81)90057-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00385-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20150431"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"CD007373","article-title":"Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion","author":"Allen RH","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(94)90067-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20160857"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13691050902919093"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20174051"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.09.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","first-page":"112","article-title":"Intrauterine device failure: Relation to its location within the uterine cavity","volume":"81","author":"Anteby E","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del208"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","first-page":"148","article-title":"Clinical performance of the Nova\u2010T380 IUD in routine use by the UK Family Planning and Reproductive Health Research Network: 12\u2010month report","volume":"26","author":"Cox M","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Fam Plann"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","first-page":"169","article-title":"The Nova\u2010T 200 intrauterine contraceptive device: A 12\u00a0year study","volume":"110","author":"Baeyertz JD","year":"1997","journal-title":"N Z Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del029"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006034.pub2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500443667"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","first-page":"LC01","article-title":"A cross sectional study on acceptability and safety of IUCD among postpartum mothers at Tertiary Care Hospital, Telangana","volume":"10","author":"Jairaj S","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S6914"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(93)90136-U"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fijgo.12809","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12809","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.12809","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12809","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,10]],"date-time":"2023-09-10T21:10:08Z","timestamp":1694380208000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.12809"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,11]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.12809"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12809","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-07-17","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-03-22","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2019-04-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}