{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T23:44:45Z","timestamp":1790811885437,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,12]],"date-time":"2019-09-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1568246400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Women who experience complications from abortion, whether unlawful or lawful, induced or spontaneous, need immediate post\u2010abortion care. Delay in providing care might cause women's avoidable disability, lost childbearing capacity, or death. Rendering care is not an abortion procedure nor illegal, and does not justify conscientious objection. Harm reduction strategies to reduce effects of unsafe abortion may legitimately inform women who might consider resort to abortifacient interventions of their rights to professional post\u2010abortion care. Healthcare practitioners\u2019 refusal or failure to provide available care might constitute ethical misconduct and attract legal liability, for instance for negligence. States are responsible to ensure healthcare practitioners\u2019 and facilities\u2019 provision of post\u2010abortion care, including both medical care and psychological support, delivered with compassion and respect for dignity, and to suppress stigmatization of patients and\/or caregivers. Mandatory reporting of patients suspected of criminal abortion violates professional confidentiality. States\u2019 failures of indicated care might constitute human rights violations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12951","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,30]],"date-time":"2019-08-30T20:20:42Z","timestamp":1567196442000},"page":"273-278","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Post\u2010abortion care: Ethical and legal duties"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"147","author":[{"given":"Bernard M.","family":"Dickens","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Law and Joint Centre for Bioethics University of Toronto  ON Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12899"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1363\/2018.29199","volume-title":"Abortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access","author":"Singh S","year":"2018"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823fe923"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/48e8516"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.01.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)30293-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","unstructured":"Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.Report of an enquiry concerning the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland under Article 8 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.Geneva: CEDAW\/C\/OP.8\/GBR\/1;2017."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12596"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","volume-title":"Why we Need to Talk About Losing a Baby","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2019"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","volume-title":"Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2012"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","unstructured":"Geneva Convention I 1949 Art.12 para.2."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","volume-title":"Normas de Atencion Humanizada Post Aborto","author":"Ministerio de Salud Publica y Bienestar Social","year":"2012"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316848050"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.9783\/9780812209990.210","volume-title":"The Right to Conscience. In Cook RJ, Erdman JN, Dickens BM. Transnational Perspectives on Abortion Law: Cases and Controversies","author":"Dickens BM","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262123051.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511973727"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2016-103560"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","first-page":"337","article-title":"Legal protection and limits of conscientious objection: When conscientious objection is unethical","volume":"28","author":"Dickens BM","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Law"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","unstructured":"Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan[2014] UKSC 68."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","volume-title":"The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect","author":"Foot P","year":"1985"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.07.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.04.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12452"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12530"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_26_1","unstructured":"De La Cruz Flores v. Peru Int. Amer. Ct of H.R. Judgment of 18 November 2004."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.02.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12693"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_29_1","unstructured":"RR v Poland Case No 27617\/04 Judgment of 26 May 2011(European Court of Human Rights) para. 206."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(18)30404-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12573"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_32_1","unstructured":"Mellet v. Ireland. Communication No. 2324\/2013(Human Rights Committee)."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_33_1","unstructured":"Whelan v. Ireland. Communication No. 2425\/2014(Human Rights Committee)."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12951","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.12951","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.12951","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T00:37:22Z","timestamp":1694219842000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.12951"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,12]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.12951"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12951","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2019-09-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}