{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T08:11:20Z","timestamp":1759565480230},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,2]],"date-time":"2020-03-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583107200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology & Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>To compare the safety of keeping an intrauterine Foley catheter for 48\u00a0hours versus 24\u00a0hours for cervical ripening.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Methods<\/jats:title>A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the De Soysa Hospital for Women, Sri Lanka from April 1 to December 31, 2014 (trial registration: SLCTR<\/jats:styled-content>\/2014\/006). Low\u2010risk women with a Bishop score \u22645 at 40\u00a0weeks\u00a0+\u00a05\u00a0days of gestation were allocated to either 24\u2010hour (n=107; Group A) or 48\u2010hour (n=94; Group B) groups. Proportions developing spontaneous onset of labor (SOL<\/jats:styled-content>), neonatal status, pre\u2010 and post\u2010procedure C\u2010reactive protein (CRP<\/jats:styled-content>), cervical smears, and placental histology in those who experienced SOL<\/jats:styled-content> were compared.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>In Group A, 35 (32.7%) experienced SOL<\/jats:styled-content>, against 54 (57.4%) in Group B (P<\/jats:italic><0.001, odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.56\u20134.93). There was no difference in mean length of active labor (7.48 vs 7.69\u00a0hours), cesarean delivery (16% vs 14%), bacterial vaginosis rates in post\u2010induction cervical smear (10.3% vs 6.7%), mean CRP<\/jats:styled-content> increase (4.08 vs 3.91 IU<\/jats:styled-content>), evidence of chorioamnionitis (5.7% vs 11.1%), mean 1 and 5\u2010minute Apgars, number of neonates with pyrexia (8.4 vs 8.5%), and admission to the Special Care Baby Unit (15% vs 12.8%).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusion<\/jats:title>Group B experienced a statistically significant increase in SOL<\/jats:styled-content>, without increasing infectious and neonatal morbidity.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13109","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,3]],"date-time":"2020-02-03T11:37:08Z","timestamp":1580729828000},"page":"225-230","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Intrauterine Foley catheter for 48 versus 24\u00a0hours for cervical ripening: A randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"149","author":[{"given":"Ruwan P. T. B.","family":"Wickramasinghe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University Obstetrics Unit De Soysa Hospital for Women Colombo Sri Lanka"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hemantha","family":"Senanayake","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University Obstetrics Unit De Soysa Hospital for Women Colombo Sri Lanka"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chandu","family":"De Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology University of Colombo Colombo Sri Lanka"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","volume-title":"WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labor","year":"2011"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1558094"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop EH","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","first-page":"180","article-title":"Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre\u2010induction of labor","volume":"84","author":"Jagielska I","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ginekologia Polska J"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3583262"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/modpathol.3800132"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_607.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","first-page":"31","article-title":"Effectiveness of intra cervical catheter as a labor pre\u2010induction method","volume":"81","author":"Patro\u2010Malysza J","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ginekologia Polska J"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","first-page":"225","article-title":"Sample size calculation in epidemiological studies","volume":"7","author":"Kasiulevicius V","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gerontologija"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","first-page":"146","article-title":"Increased risk of cervical canal infections with intra\u2010cervical Foley catheter","volume":"13","author":"Siddiqui S","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","first-page":"177","article-title":"Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review","volume":"99","author":"Jennifer H","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fijgo.13109","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.13109","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.13109","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.13109","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,29]],"date-time":"2023-08-29T17:08:58Z","timestamp":1693328938000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.13109"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,2]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.13109"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13109","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2019-08-09","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2020-01-31","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2020-03-02","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}