{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,13]],"date-time":"2025-05-13T15:14:28Z","timestamp":1747149268457,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,19]],"date-time":"2021-01-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1611014400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Brazil has witnessed a conservative shift in recent years, reflected in setbacks in the field of reproductive rights. Commentators have drawn attention to changes in public policies and legislation that follow this shift. However, due attention has not been paid to changes in the professional standards regulating medical practice and their subsequent consequences for reproductive rights. Against this backdrop, this article examines two recent resolutions enacted by Brazilian medical boards, which violate ethical duties and the law. The first imposes a duty for doctors to disclose confidential medical information about their patients in sexual abuse cases. The second one determines that a pregnant woman's right to refuse medical treatment should be evaluated considering the fetus. This article argues that conservative setbacks operate not only through visible means, such as enacted legislation, but also furtively \u2010 through professional medical resolutions. It also asserts that, in such a context, the debate about women's bodily autonomy shifts once again from the human rights ground to the medical field, where it has traditionally been subjected to control and coercion. Finally, it points out the risk that these rules might be used to legitimize new conservative laws and public policies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13510","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,5]],"date-time":"2020-12-05T01:50:06Z","timestamp":1607133006000},"page":"459-464","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Confidentiality and treatment refusal: Conservative shifts on reproductive rights by Brazilian medical boards"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"152","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9721-5221","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Juliana","family":"Cesario Alvim Gomes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Law School Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte MG Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2344-3328","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Corina Helena","family":"Figueira Mendes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fernandes Figueira National Institute of Women Children and Adolescent Health Oswaldo Cruz Foundation Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7312\/brow19384"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/26410397.2019.1669338"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.9783\/9780812209990.143","volume-title":"Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies","author":"Bergallo P","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","unstructured":"BenvindoJZ.Abusive Impeachment? Brazilian Political Turmoil and the Judicialization ofMega\u2010Politics. Int\u2019l J. Const. L. Blog. April 23 2016. [Iconnect blog website].http:\/\/www.iconnectblog.com\/2016\/04\/abusive\u2010impeachment\u2010brazilian\u2010political\u2010turmoil\u2010and\u2010the\u2010judicialization\u2010of\u2010mega\u2010politics. AccessedJune 15 2020."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","unstructured":"Institute for Socio\u2010economic Studies Oxfam Brasil the Center for Economic and Social Rights.Human Rights in Times of Austerity.2017. [INESC website]https:\/\/www.inesc.org.br\/wp\u2010content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Fact\u2010Sheet\u20102\u2010English\u2010V_digital_4.pdf. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","unstructured":"Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.High Commissioner updates the Human Rights Council on human rights concerns and progress across the world. Human Rights Council 43rd Session Item 2. Geneva February 272020.https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/EN\/HRBodies\/HRC\/Pages\/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=25621&LangID=E. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","unstructured":"Londo\u00f1oE CasadoL.Brazil Under Bolsonaro Has Message for Teenagers: Save Sex for Marriage. The New York Times. January 26 2020. [NYT website]www.nytimes.com\/2020\/01\/26\/world\/americas\/brazil\u2010teen\u2010pregnancy\u2010Bolsonaro.html. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/1806-9282.65.9.1209"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","unstructured":"United Nations.Concluding Sixty\u2010Third Session Women\u2019s Commission Approves Text on Strengthening Social Protection Systems Sustainable Infrastructure for Gender Equality. March 22 2019. [UN Website]https:\/\/www.un.org\/press\/en\/2019\/wom2179.doc.htm. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","unstructured":"Federa\u00e7\u00e3o Brasileira das Associa\u00e7\u00f5es de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia \u2010 FEBRASGO Nota de posicionamento \u2010 Sobre a posi\u00e7\u00e3o da diplomacia brasileira contr\u00e1ria \u00e0 resolu\u00e7\u00e3o da ONU que visa combater a discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o contra mulheres e meninas.Comiss\u00e3o Nacional Especializada de Viol\u00eancia Sexual e Interrup\u00e7\u00e3o da Gesta\u00e7\u00e3o Prevista em Lei. [Febrasgo website]https:\/\/www.febrasgo.org.br\/pt\/noticias\/item\/1069\u2010pesquisa\u2010expectativa\u2010da\u2010mulher\u2010brasileira\u2010sobre\u2010sua\u2010vida\u2010sexual\u2010e\u2010reprodutiva. Accessed August 12 2020"},{"volume-title":"Religi\u00e3o e pol\u00edtica: uma an\u00e1lise da atua\u00e7\u00e3o de parlamentares evang\u00e9licos sobre direitos das mulheres e de LGBTs no Brasil","year":"2012","author":"Vital C","key":"e_1_2_9_12_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","unstructured":"Supremo Tribunal Federal.Argui\u00e7\u00e3o de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental. n. 462 466 578. [STF website]http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/. Accessed August 28 2020."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","unstructured":"Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics updated on November 1rst 2018. [CFM website]https:\/\/sistemas.cfm.org.br\/normas\/visualizar\/resolucoes\/BR\/2018\/2217. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","unstructured":"Regional Board of Medicine of the State of Rio de Janeiro.Resolution No. 296\/2019. July 16 2019.https:\/\/www.cremerj.org.br\/resolucoes\/exibe\/resolucao\/1416. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","unstructured":"Federal Board of Medicine.Resolution No. 2 232\/2019. DOU. July 17 2019.https:\/\/portal.cfm.org.br\/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28439:2019\u201009\u201017\u201018\u201032\u201010&catid=3. Accessed June 24 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","unstructured":"Statutory Law No. 13931\/2019 former Bill 3837\/2015 presented on December 01 2015. [Brazilian Federal Government website].http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/_Ato2019\u20102022\/2019\/Lei\/L13931.htm. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","unstructured":"Brazilian Ministry of Health.Portaria de Consolida\u00e7\u00e3o no 4. September 28 2017. [Ministry of Health website]http:\/\/bvsms.saude.gov.br\/bvs\/saudelegis\/gm\/2017\/prc0004_03_10_2017.html. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization; Pan American Health Organization.Understanding and addressing violence against women: health consequences.2012(WHO\/RHR\/12.37)https:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/handle\/10665\/77434\/WHO_RHR_12.37_eng.pdf;jsessionid=D90910C4F934D71EE4F536205FC29286?sequence=1. Accessed June 15 2020. AccessedJune 15 2020."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","unstructured":"Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.Recommendation No. 33\/2015 on women\u2019s access to justice. August 03 2015(CEDAW\/C\/GC\/33).https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/hrbodies\/cedaw\/pages\/recommendations.aspx. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5380\/rinc.v5i3.60973"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","unstructured":"Human Rights Committee.Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee. Chile\/March 30 1999. (CCPR\/C\/79\/Add. 104) [UNdocs website]https:\/\/undocs.org\/CCPR\/C\/79\/Add.104. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.9783\/9780812209990.347"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","unstructured":"Federal Board of Medicine.Resolution No. 1 605\/2000. DOU. September 29 2000.https:\/\/sistemas.cfm.org.br\/normas\/visualizar\/resolucoes\/BR\/2000\/1605. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","unstructured":"The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Committee for The Study of Ethics in Human Reproduction and Women\u2019s Health.Confidentiality Privacy and Security of Patients\u2019 Health Care Information. November 2005 In: Ethical Issues on Obstetrics and Gynecology October2012.https:\/\/www.figo.org\/sites\/default\/files\/2020\u201007\/English%20Ethical%20Issues%20in%20Obstetrics%20and%20Gynecology.pdf. Accessed August 02 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_26_1","unstructured":"Brazilian Federal Constitution 1998.http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/constituicao\/constituicao.htm. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_27_1","unstructured":"Civil Code.Statutory Law No. 10 406\/2002. [Federal Government website]http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/leis\/2002\/L10406compilada.htm. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_28_1","unstructured":"Criminal Code.Decree\u2010Law 2 848\/1940.http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/decreto\u2010lei\/del2848compilado.htm. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_29_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization.Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second edition.2012.https:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/handle\/10665\/70914\/9789241548434_eng.pdf;jsessionid=88AE7ABDBBE5200CF7B4288118043AAF?sequence=1. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_30_1","unstructured":"United Nations Human Rights Committee.CCPR General Comment 28: Equality of Rights between Men and Women (Article 3). UN GAOR2000 (UN Doc A\/55\/40 annex VI).https:\/\/www.refworld.org\/pdfid\/45139c9b4.pdf. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_31_1","unstructured":"Inter\u2010American Court of Human Rights.Case of De La Cruz\u2010Flores v. Peru. Judgment of November 18 2004(Merits Reparations and Costs) \u00a7\u00a7 101\u2013102.https:\/\/www.corteidh.or.cr\/docs\/casos\/articulos\/seriec_115_ing.pdf. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_32_1","unstructured":"Brazilian Ministry of Health.Portaria 2 282\/2020. August 27 2020.https:\/\/www.in.gov.br\/en\/web\/dou\/\u2010\/portaria\u2010n\u20102.282\u2010de\u201027\u2010de\u2010agosto\u2010de\u20102020\u2010274644814. Accessed November 12 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_33_1","unstructured":"S\u00e3o Paulo Human Rights Regional Office of the Federal Public Defenders S\u00e3o Paulo Public Defender Office.Recommendation to the Federal Board of Medicine. September 26 2019.https:\/\/www.dpu.def.br\/images\/stories\/pdf_noticias\/2019\/SP_DRDH_recomendacao_CFM.pdf. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_9_34_1","first-page":"337","article-title":"The growing abuse of conscientious objection","volume":"8","author":"Dickens BM","year":"2006","journal-title":"Virtual Mentor"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_35_1","unstructured":"Public Civil Suit (A\u00e7\u00e3o Civil P\u00fablica)No. 5021263\u201350 2019.4.03.6100 8\u00aa Vara C\u00edvel Federal de S\u00e3o Paulo. [MPF web]www.mpf.mp.br\u203a sp \u203a docs \u203a decisao\u2010acp\u2010cfm. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/0102-311X00151513"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_37_1","unstructured":"DubravkaS.Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences on a human rights\u2010based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence. (A\/74\/137). July 112019.https:\/\/digitallibrary.un.org\/record\/3823698#record\u2010files\u2010collapse\u2010header. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_38_1","unstructured":"Constitutional Claim of Non\u2010Compliance with a Fundamental Precept (Arg\u00fci\u00e7\u00e3o de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental). No. 642.http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/processos\/detalhe.asp?incidente=5839268. Accessed June 24 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_39_1","unstructured":"The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Committee for The Study of Ethics in Human Reproduction and Women\u2019s Health.Ethical Guidelines regarding Interventions for Fetal Well Being. November2005. In: Ethical Issues on Obstetrics and Gynecology March 2011.https:\/\/www.figo.org\/sites\/default\/files\/2020\u201007\/English%20Ethical%20Issues%20in%20Obstetrics%20and%20Gynecology.pdf. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_40_1","unstructured":"Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights.General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12). 22nd Session 2000. UN Doc. E\/C.12\/2000\/4 (2000) Par. 8.https:\/\/www.refworld.org. Accessed June 15 2020"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_41_1","unstructured":"Inter\u2010American Court of Human Rights.Artavia Murillo (\u201cIn Vitro Fertilization\u201d) v. Costa Rica. Preliminary objections merits reparations and costs. Judgement of November 28 2012. S\u00e9rie C No. 257. Par. 222 223.http:\/\/www.corteidh.or.cr\/docs\/casos\/articulos\/seriec_257_ing.pdf. Accessed June 15 2020"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.13510","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.13510","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.13510","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,3]],"date-time":"2023-09-03T00:59:24Z","timestamp":1693702764000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.13510"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,19]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.13510"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13510","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0020-7292"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1879-3479"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-01-19","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}