{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T11:07:07Z","timestamp":1792062427843,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,19]],"date-time":"2022-03-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1647648000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare the ability of six scoring systems to predict successful labor induction with cervical ripening among women with a Bishop score &lt;3.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Secondary analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter observational Methods of Induction of Labor and Perinatal Outcomes (MEDIP) cohort study in 94 obstetrical French units. We included women with a Bishop score &lt;3 before cervical ripening. We compared six scores: Bishop, simplified Bishop, modified Bishop, simplified Bishop including parity, Hughey, and Levine scores. Vaginal delivery defined successful labor induction. The ability of each score to predict successful labor induction was evaluated by comparing their area under the curve (AUC).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Among the 600 eligible women in this study, 408 (68%) delivered vaginally. Body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters; mean\u00a0\u00b1\u00a0standard deviation [SD]: 24.7\u00a0\u00b1\u00a05.5 vs 26.0\u00a0\u00b1\u00a05.7; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.01) and nulliparity (48.8% vs 85.4%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0&lt;\u00a00.001) were lower in the successful induction group, whereas height was higher (mean\u00a0\u00b1\u00a0SD: 165.3\u00a0\u00b1\u00a06.0\u00a0cm vs 163.7\u00a0\u00b1\u00a06.0\u00a0cm; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.002). The simplified Bishop including parity, Hughey, and Levine scores had the highest AUC (0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65\u20130.73; 0.68, 95% CI 0.64\u20130.74; and 0.69, 95% CI 0.65\u20130.74, respectively).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>In women with a very unfavorable cervix, scores that include parity predict successful labor induction more accurately, such as simplified Bishop including parity, Hughey, or Levine scores.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14171","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,5]],"date-time":"2022-03-05T01:19:07Z","timestamp":1646443147000},"page":"53-58","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Prediction of successful labor induction with very unfavorable cervix: A comparison of six scores"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"160","author":[{"given":"Pauline","family":"Tollon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics CHU Lille  Lille France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pauline","family":"Blanc\u2010Petitjean","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"EPOP\u00e9 Team Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics\/CRESS, INSERM, Universit\u00e9 de Paris, INRA  Paris France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elodie","family":"Drumez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistics CHU Lille  Lille France"},{"name":"EA 2694 ULR METRICS University of Lille  Lille France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louise","family":"Ghesqui\u00e8re","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics CHU Lille  Lille France"},{"name":"EA 2694 ULR METRICS University of Lille  Lille France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Camille","family":"Le Ray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"EPOP\u00e9 Team Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics\/CRESS, INSERM, Universit\u00e9 de Paris, INRA  Paris France"},{"name":"Port\u2010Royal Maternity Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Cochin Broca H\u00f4tel\u2010Dieu Hospital Assistance Publique\u2010H\u00f4pitaux de Paris (AP\u2010HP), FHU PREMA  Paris France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Garabedian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics CHU Lille  Lille France"},{"name":"EA 2694 ULR METRICS University of Lille  Lille France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.046"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","first-page":"075","article-title":"Interaction between maternal obesity and Bishop Score in predicting successful induction of labor in term nulliparous patients","volume":"30","author":"Zelig CM","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop EH","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.09.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","first-page":"635","article-title":"An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems","volume":"48","author":"Hughey MJ","year":"1976","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.603"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004257"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1693695"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003405"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003696"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.025"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90371-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(89)91094-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(56)90424-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.034"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.03.051"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003377"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13794"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01038.x"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.14171","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.14171","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.14171","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,19]],"date-time":"2023-08-19T10:46:05Z","timestamp":1692441965000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.14171"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,19]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.14171"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.14171","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-10-22","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-03-01","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-03-19","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}