{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T13:14:03Z","timestamp":1790255643605,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,17]],"date-time":"2022-08-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1660694400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022), the US Supreme Court reversed longstanding court precedents that protected abortion as a fundamental right. Without that federal baseline, many states are passing restrictive laws that threaten providers and complicate patient care. The legal issues raised by these state restrictions are complex, including questions such as the exterritorial application of state restrictions and federal authority to regulate access to medication abortion. Meanwhile, providers who risk criminal or civil penalties for violating these laws may be deterred from providing services to those seeking care, including for ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages. State variations are dramatic, with some states taking steps to strengthen their abortion protections while others are eliminating abortion access even in situations of rape or incest. As dire as these developments are, it is hoped that they can serve as a wake\u2010up call heard worldwide, to avoid complacency and maintain vigilance to protect abortion rights.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14392","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,11]],"date-time":"2022-08-11T17:44:38Z","timestamp":1660239878000},"page":"324-329","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["The state of abortion rights in the <scp>US<\/scp>"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"159","author":[{"given":"Martha F.","family":"Davis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law  Boston Massachusetts USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","unstructured":"Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 142 S.Ct. 2228\u20102354;2022."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","unstructured":"Roe v. Wade 410 US 113\u2010178;1973."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","unstructured":"Planned Parenthood v. Casey 505 US 833\u20101002;1992."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","unstructured":"Mississippi Gestational Age Act Miss. Code Ann. \u00a741\u201341\u2013191."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","unstructured":"ShepherdK.Mississippi's last abortion clinic shutters as trigger ban begins.Washington Post. July 6 2022. Accessed August 15 2022.https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/nation\/2022\/07\/06\/missisppi\u2010abortion\u2010clinic\u2010closure\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","unstructured":"CohenD DonleyG Rebouch\u00e9R.The new abortion battleground.122 Columbia Law Rev;2023. Accessed August 15 2022.https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4032931"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","unstructured":"Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization No. 19\u20101392 (US Sept. 20 2021). Brief of Constitutional Law Scholars Lee C. Bollinger Erwin Chemerinsky Sherry F. Kolb et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","unstructured":"\u2018Trigger Laws\u2019 set off a scramble for abortion services.New York Times. June 25 2022. Accessed July 26 2022 https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/live\/2022\/06\/25\/us\/abortion\u2010roe\u2010wade\u2010supreme\u2010court#abortion\u2010decision\u2010reaction"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","unstructured":"State facts about abortion: Massachusetts. Guttmacher Institute. June 2022. Accessed August 15 2022.https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/fact\u2010sheet\/state\u2010facts\u2010about\u2010abortion\u2010massachusetts"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","unstructured":"Tracking the states where abortion is now banned.New York Times. July 22 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2022\/us\/abortion\u2010laws\u2010roe\u2010v\u2010wade.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","unstructured":"State facts about abortion: South Carolina. Guttmacher Institute. June 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/fact\u2010sheet\/state\u2010facts\u2010about\u2010abortion\u2010south\u2010carolina"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","unstructured":"State facts about abortion: Alabama. Guttmacher Institute. June 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/fact\u2010sheet\/state\u2010facts\u2010about\u2010abortion\u2010alabama"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","unstructured":"QuayG.Briefing: how do rape and incest abortion exceptions work?The Week. July 20 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/theweek.com\/feature\/briefing\/1015189\/how\u2010do\u2010rape\u2010and\u2010incest\u2010exceptions\u2010work"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","unstructured":"AliS.Prosecutors in states where abortion is now illegal could begin building criminal cases against providers.NBC News. June 24 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/news\/us\u2010news\/prosecutors\u2010states\u2010abortion\u2010now\u2010illegal\u2010begin\u2010prosecute\u2010abortion\u2010provi\u2010rcna35268"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","unstructured":"GoodmanJD HealyJ.In states banning abortion a growing rift over enforcement.New York Times. June 29 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/06\/29\/us\/abortion\u2010enforcement\u2010prosecutors.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","unstructured":"Prosecuting attorneys Council of Georgia. About PACGA. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/pacga.org\/about\u2010pacga\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","unstructured":"BowmanE.As states ban abortion the Texas Bounty Law offers a way to survive legal challenges.National Public Radio. July 11 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2022\/07\/11\/1107741175\/texas\u2010abortion\u2010bounty\u2010law"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","unstructured":"Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137\u2010180\u00a0(1803)."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","unstructured":"MassieG.Can Roe v. Wade be reinstated after being overturned by the supreme court?Independent. June 27 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/americas\/us\u2010politics\/supreme\u2010court\u2010roe\u2010v\u2010wade\u2010b2109117.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","first-page":"1917","article-title":"Originalism, abortion, and the thirteenth amendment","volume":"112","author":"Koppelman A","year":"2012","journal-title":"Columbia Law Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","first-page":"128","article-title":"Finding a new home for the abortion right under the ninth amendment","volume":"12","author":"Kruschke A","year":"2020","journal-title":"ConLawNOW"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_23_1","first-page":"328","article-title":"Abortion and original meaning, 24","volume":"291","author":"Balkin JM","year":"2007","journal-title":"Constitutional Commentary"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_24_1","unstructured":"KellyK.Op ed: the best way to protect abortion rights? Finalize the Equal Rights Amendment.Los Angeles Times. May 23 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/opinion\/story\/2022\u201005\u201023\/roe\u2010abortion\u2010equal\u2010rights\u2010amendment"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_25_1","unstructured":"Congressional research service legal sidebar: congressional authority to regulate abortion. July 8 2022."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_26_1","unstructured":"The White House fact sheet: President Biden to sign executive order protecting access to reproductive health care services. July 8 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing\u2010room\/statements\u2010releases\/2022\/07\/08\/fact\u2010sheet\u2010president\u2010biden\u2010to\u2010sign\u2010executive\u2010order\u2010protecting\u2010access\u2010to\u2010reproductive\u2010health\u2010care\u2010services\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_27_1","unstructured":"LarsonE.Texas sues to block Biden rule on hospital emergency abortions.Bloomberg Law. July 15 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/news.bloomberglaw.com\/health\u2010law\u2010and\u2010business\/texas\u2010sues\u2010to\u2010block\u2010biden\u2010rule\u2010on\u2010emergency\u2010abortions\u2010procedure"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_28_1","unstructured":"BranhamD.What are abortion pills? Are they legal in Oklahoma? Here's what you need to know.The Oklahoman. June 29 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.oklahoman.com\/story\/news\/2022\/06\/29\/oklahoma\u2010abortion\u2010pills\u2010law\u2010what\u2010to\u2010know\/7768333001\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_29_1","unstructured":"PloegLV ZernikeK.Oklahoma governor signs bill that bans most abortions.New York Times. May 25 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/05\/25\/us\/oklahoma\u2010abortion\u2010ban\u2010law\u2010governor.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_30_1","unstructured":"IzaguirreA.Florida 15\u2010week abortion ban reinstated after legal appeal.Associated Press. July 5 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion\u2010health\u2010florida\u2010government\u2010and\u2010politics\u2010e8bdb85e6736085606ba2661c186a1d5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_31_1","unstructured":"MesserlyM OllsteinAM.Abortion bans and penalties would vary widely by state.Politico. May 6 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/05\/06\/potential\u2010abortion\u2010bans\u2010and\u2010penalties\u2010by\u2010state\u201000030572"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_32_1","unstructured":"BrownC.Abortion ruling pits state bans against OB\u2010GYN training rules.Bloomberg Law. June 27 2022. Accessed July 29 2022.https:\/\/news.bloomberglaw.com\/health\u2010law\u2010and\u2010business\/abortion\u2010ruling\u2010pits\u2010state\u2010bans\u2010against\u2010ob\u2010gyn\u2010training\u2010rules"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_33_1","unstructured":"BelluckP.They had miscarriages and new abortion laws obstructed treatment.New York Times. July 17 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/07\/17\/health\/abortion\u2010miscarriage\u2010treatment.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_34_1","unstructured":"EvansML BradleyET IrelandL ZeraCCommentary: how the fall of Roe could change abortion care in Massachusetts.WBUR Cognoscenti. July 26 2022. Accessed August 15 2022.https:\/\/www.wbur.org\/cognoscenti\/2022\/07\/26\/dobbs\u2010roe\u2010abortion\u2010massachusetts\u2010megan\u2010l\u2010evans\u2010erin\u2010t\u2010bradley\u2010luu\u2010ireland\u2010chloe\u2010zera"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_35_1","unstructured":"MunozND UribeMR.How treatment of ectopic pregnancy fits into post\u2010Roe medical care.Politifact. June 30 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.politifact.com\/article\/2022\/jun\/30\/how\u2010treatment\u2010ectopic\u2010pregnancy\u2010fits\u2010post\u2010roe\u2010medi\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_36_1","unstructured":"HoffmanJ.Infertility patients and doctors fear abortion bans could restrict I.V.F.New York Times. July 5 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/07\/05\/health\/ivf\u2010embryos\u2010roe\u2010dobbs.html"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_37_1","unstructured":"BendixB.States say abortion bans don't affect IVF. Providers and lawyers are worried anyway.NBC News. June 29 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/health\/health\u2010news\/states\u2010say\u2010abortion\u2010bans\u2010dont\u2010affect\u2010ivf\u2010providers\u2010lawyers\u2010worry\u2010rcna35556"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_38_1","unstructured":"WeissDC.Georgia can immediately enforce abortion law defining fetus as \u2018natural person \u2019 11th circuit rules.ABA Journal. July 20 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.abajournal.com\/news\/article\/georgia\u2010can\u2010enforce\u2010abortion\u2010law\u2010defining\u2010fetus\u2010as\u2010natural\u2010person\u201011th\u2010circuit\u2010rules"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_39_1","unstructured":"BunchR.Georgia's abortion law likely to raise flurry of questions in court.GPB. July 23 2022. Accessed July 26 2022.https:\/\/www.gpb.org\/news\/2022\/07\/23\/georgias\u2010abortion\u2010law\u2010likely\u2010raise\u2010flurry\u2010of\u2010questions\u2010in\u2010court"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.14392","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.14392","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.14392","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]],"date-time":"2023-08-23T01:35:41Z","timestamp":1692754541000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.14392"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,17]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.14392"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.14392","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-08-17","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}