{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,14]],"date-time":"2026-03-14T19:57:42Z","timestamp":1773518262630,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,20]],"date-time":"2024-08-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724112000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology & Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>This study aimed to assess whether a partial term prelabor rupture of membranes (partial TPROM) had an impact on the spontaneous onset of labor compared to complete TPROM.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Methods<\/jats:title>We performed a retrospective study in a French level III maternity hospital. We included all singleton cephalic pregnancies presenting with prelabor rupture of membranes \u226537\u2009weeks gestational age. Patients with a partial TPROM (P group) were compared to patients with a complete TPROM (C group). Induction of labor was performed following expectative management of 24\u201348\u2009h, and antibiotic prophylaxis was started 12\u2009h after rupture. Our main outcome measure was the rate of patients who had spontaneous labor 24\u2009h following prelabor rupture.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>Overall, 389 women were included in the study, 148 in the P group, 241 in the C group. The proportion of women who went into spontaneous labor in the 24\u2009h following TPROM was significantly lower in the P group (45% vs 64%, P<\/jats:italic>\u2009<\u20090.001). A partial TPROM was a predictive factor for absence of labor at 24\u2009h following rupture (adjusted odds ratio: 0.44 [0.29\u20130.68]). There were more cases of induction of labor (50% vs 20%, P<\/jats:italic>\u2009<\u20090.001) and antibiotic prophylaxis (91% vs 73%, P<\/jats:italic>\u2009<\u20090.001) in the P group. However, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusion<\/jats:title>Compared to complete TPROM, partial TPROM is associated with a lower probability of spontaneous labor in the 24\u2009h following rupture. The persistence of a residual membrane has been identified as a risk factor for delaying labor beyond 24\u2009h.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15851","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,20]],"date-time":"2024-08-20T07:18:40Z","timestamp":1724138320000},"page":"253-258","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Impact of partial prelabor rupture of membranes at term on labor and on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes: A\u00a0retrospective case\u2013control study"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"168","author":[{"given":"Ambre\u2010Marie","family":"Bomal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marie\u2010Charlotte","family":"Faurant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Le Mans Hospital Le Mans France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hady","family":"El Hachem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Lebanese American University Medical Center Beirut Lebanon"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bruno","family":"Vielle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical Research Center Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Philippe","family":"Gillard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S\u00e9bastien","family":"Madzou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Florence","family":"Biquard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guillaume","family":"Legendre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pierre\u2010Emmanuel","family":"Bouet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Angers University Hospital Angers France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_10_2_1","first-page":"671","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes at term in nulliparous women: a hazard?","volume":"76","author":"Cammu H","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(70)90378-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_1","first-page":"1112","volume-title":"Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Vol. 2. Childbirth","author":"Grant J","year":"1989"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_10_5_1","article-title":"Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37\u2009weeks or more)","volume":"1","author":"Middleton P","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_10_7_1","first-page":"15","article-title":"Rupture des membranes \u00e0 terme avant travail. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF \u2013 Texte court","volume":"48","author":"Senat MV","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199604183341601"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.09.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12887-020-02042-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41390-023-02525-1"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.15851","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,17]],"date-time":"2025-01-17T12:19:36Z","timestamp":1737116376000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.15851"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,20]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.15851"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.15851","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-06-01","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-08-01","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-08-20","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}