{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T14:44:32Z","timestamp":1782744272716,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":77,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782691200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782691200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp;amp; Obste"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Approximately one in four first\u2010time mothers reach the second stage of labor but cannot have a spontaneous vaginal birth, necessitating an intervention such as forceps to facilitate birth.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study synthesizes evidence comparing severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and neonatal morbidity or mortality (SNMM) following forceps and cesarean birth (CB) in the second stage of labor.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Method<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Four databases were searched from database inception to May 30, 2023. Original studies comparing SMM or SNMM among individuals with an attempted forceps birth versus second stage CB were included. Meta\u2010analyses were conducted using the Mantel\u2013Haenszel random\u2010effects model and the risk ratio (RR) was used as an effect measure with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>After screening 945 articles, a total of 13 cohort studies encompassing 52\u2009192 individuals were included. Four studies with 34\u2009131 total individuals provided data on SMM. The incidence of SMM was 2.6% with attempted forceps versus 3.7% with second\u2010stage CB (pooled RR of 0.83, 95% CI 0.64, 1.07). Six studies with a total of 36\u2009135 individuals provided data on SNMM. The incidence of SNMM was 4.5% with forceps versus 2.1% with second stage CB (pooled RR of 1.34, 95% CI 0.90, 2.00). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of attempted forceps on SMM and SNMM due to moderate or serious risk of bias, inconsistency, and heterogeneity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Risks of SMM and SNMM are unclear after forceps and second stage CB and the choice between operative interventions should depend on the clinical scenario.<\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Our study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/PROSPERO\/\">PROSPERO<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      ) database (CRD42023387112) on January 2, 2023.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.71152","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T13:50:58Z","timestamp":1782741058000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity or mortality in forceps versus cesarean birth in the second stage of labor: A systematic review and meta\u2010analysis"],"prefix":"10.1002","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5747-0172","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Irina I.","family":"Oltean","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University  Hamilton Ontario Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abirami","family":"Kirubarajan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University  Hamilton Ontario Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giulia M.","family":"Muraca","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University  Hamilton Ontario Canada"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University  Hamilton Ontario Canada"},{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Solna Karolinska Institute  Stockholm Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics","author":"Cunningham G","year":"2022"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30282-6","article-title":"Prolonged second stage of labour and the risk for subsequent preterm birth","volume":"37","author":"Sciaky\u2010Tamir Y","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.06.018","article-title":"Morbidity and mortality associated with forceps and vacuum delivery at outlet, low, and Midpelvic Station","volume":"41","author":"Muraca GM","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.161156","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station","volume":"189","author":"Muraca GM","year":"2017","journal-title":"Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m3377","article-title":"Risk of complicated birth at term in nulliparous and multiparous women using routinely collected maternity data in England: cohort study","volume":"371","author":"Jardine J","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"870","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.10.020","article-title":"No. 381\u2010Assisted Vaginal BJ Obstet Gynaecol Canirth","volume":"41","author":"Hobson S","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e149","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003764","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin No. 219: Operative Vaginal Birth","volume":"135","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.003","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery","volume":"56","author":"Murphy DJ","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey AB","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005447","article-title":"First and second stage labor management","volume":"143","author":"Cahill A","year":"2024","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16336","article-title":"Assisted vaginal birth: Green\u2010top guideline No. 26","volume":"127","author":"Murphy D","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1017\/9781009497459.008","volume-title":"Best Practice in Labour and Delivery","author":"Murphy DJ","year":"2025"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber E","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics","author":"Cunningham G","year":"2022"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_16_1","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics","author":"Cunningham G","year":"2022"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_17_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Instruments for assisted vaginal birth (review)","volume":"9","author":"Verma GL","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_18_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"10","author":"Page MJ","year":"2021","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12574","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity surveillance: monitoring pregnant women at high risk for prolonged hospitalisation and death","volume":"34","author":"Dzakpasu S","year":"2019","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12665","article-title":"Composite neonatal morbidity indicators using hospital discharge data: A systematic review","volume":"34","author":"Lebreton E","year":"2020","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F502","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2018-315147","article-title":"Establishing a composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator using English hospital administrative data","volume":"104","author":"Knight HE","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_22_1","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Identifying Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM).2024https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/maternal\u2010infant\u2010health\/php\/severe\u2010maternal\u2010morbidity\/icd.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/reproductivehealth\/maternalinfanthealth\/smm\/severe\u2010morbidity\u2010ICD.htm(accessed March 8 2024)"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.050","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity: Screening and review","volume":"215","author":"Kilpatrick SK","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_24_1","first-page":"114","article-title":"Neonatal adverse outcomes among hospital livebirths in Canada: A National Retrospective Study","volume":"122","author":"Nelson CRM","year":"2025","journal-title":"Neonatology"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.009","article-title":"Defining and managing normal and abnormal second stage of labor","volume":"44","author":"Cheng YW","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_26_1","unstructured":"FantomN SerajuddinU.Policy Research Working Paper 7528 The World Bank's Classification of Countries by Income.2016."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2021.101199","article-title":"Cesarean delivery in low\u2010 and middle\u2010income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement","volume":"26","author":"Boatin AA","year":"2021","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1335","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14477","article-title":"Assisted vaginal delivery in low and middle income countries: An overview","volume":"124","author":"Bailey PE","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1673656","article-title":"A prospective, population\u2010based study of trends in operative vaginal delivery compared to cesarean delivery rates in low\u2010 and middle\u2010income countries, 2010\u20102016","volume":"36","author":"Harrison MS","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.08.009","article-title":"Evolution of operative obstetric delivery in Canada","volume":"41","author":"Baskett TF","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_31_1","first-page":"5","article-title":"Vacuum\u2010assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"2","author":"Ali U","year":"2009","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.002","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery \u2013 An historical perspective","volume":"56","author":"Baskett TF","year":"2019","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.5596\/c14-016","article-title":"Product review: Covidence (systematic review software)","volume":"35","author":"Babineau J","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Can Health Libr Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.27604","article-title":"Umbilical cord pH levels and neonatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"7","author":"Andersson CB","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_35_1","volume-title":"Cord Blood Gas","author":"Saneh H","year":"2024"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c1471","article-title":"Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: Systematic review and meta\u2010analysis","volume":"340","author":"Malin GL","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211238","article-title":"Acidosis in newborns with nuchal cords and normal apgar scores","volume":"25","author":"Martin GC","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12011","article-title":"Population\u2010based study of risk factors for severe maternal morbidity","volume":"26","author":"Gray KE","year":"2012","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34655-2","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 2003 to 2007: Surveillance using routine hospitalization data and ICD\u201010CA codes","volume":"32","author":"Joseph KS","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14820","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery","volume":"125","author":"Muraca GM","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_41_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"ROBINS\u2010I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non\u2010randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne JA","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2008.07.061","article-title":"Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and the development of behavioral problems in childhood and adolescence: The Western Australian pregnancy cohort study","volume":"154","author":"Robinson M","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e410","DOI":"10.1016\/S2542-5196(22)00073-0","article-title":"Global, regional, and national burden of mortality associated with short\u2010term temperature variability from 2000\u201319: A three\u2010stage modelling study","volume":"6","author":"Wu Y","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet Planet Health"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60820-4","article-title":"National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: A systematic analysis and implications","volume":"379","author":"Blencowe H","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_45_1","unstructured":"SiemieniukR GuyattG.What is GRADE? BMJ Best Practice.2020https:\/\/bestpractice\u2010bmj\u2010com.bibliotheek.ehb.be\/info\/evidence\/learn\u2010ebm\/what\u2010is\u2010grade\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012","article-title":"GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS\u2010I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence","volume":"111","author":"Sch\u00fcnemann HJ","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_47_1","unstructured":"McMaster University.GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool.2025https:\/\/methods.cochrane.org\/gradeing\/gradepro\u2010gdt"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_48_1","unstructured":"The Cochrane Collaboration.Review Manager (RevMan) Version 8.1.1.2024revman.cochrane.org"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_49_1","first-page":"85","volume-title":"Designing Clinical Research","author":"Hulley SB","year":"2022"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.pu.09.050188.001011","article-title":"A general overview of mantel\u2010Haenszel methods: Applications and recent developments","volume":"9","author":"Kuritz SJ","year":"1988","journal-title":"Annu Rev Public Health"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_51_1","volume-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.5","author":"Deeks JJ","year":"2022"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1761","article-title":"What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta\u2010analysis of sparse data","volume":"23","author":"Sweeting MJ","year":"2004","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1490720","article-title":"A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with forceps delivery versus cesarean delivery","volume":"33","author":"Liu X","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026","article-title":"Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries","volume":"254","author":"Giacchino T","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1861","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1228058","article-title":"Choosing between bad, worse and worst: What is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?","volume":"30","author":"Hendler I","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9","article-title":"Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes","volume":"121","author":"Walsh CA","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A re\u2010evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: Retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"120","author":"Tempest N","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.007","article-title":"Evaluation of delivery options for second\u2010stage events","volume":"214","author":"Bailit JL","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)80036-1","article-title":"Failed trial of vacuum or forceps fetal outcome maternal and fetal outcome","volume":"176","author":"Revah A","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1159\/000458524","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal short\u2010term outcome parameters in instrument\u2010assisted vaginal delivery compared to second stage cesarean section in labour: A retrospective 11\u2010year analysis","volume":"83","author":"Polkowski M","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1247605","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery","volume":"27","author":"Contag SA","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16589","article-title":"Comparison of perinatal outcomes for all modes of second stage delivery in obstetric theatres: A retrospective observational study","volume":"128","author":"Gurney L","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90903-K","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcome in low\u2010pelvic and midpelvic operative deliveries","volume":"162","author":"Robertson P","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001156","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor","volume":"126","author":"Halscott TL","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.24","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: Population based retrospective analysis","volume":"329","author":"Demissie K","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner D","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_67_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births","volume":"4","author":"Majoko F","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_68_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births","volume":"10","author":"Majoko F","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_69_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vacuum extraction or caesarean section in the second stage of labour: A systematic review","volume":"00","author":"Thierens S","year":"2023","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_70_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph17217762","article-title":"Relationship between prolonged second stage of labor and short\u2010term neonatal morbidity: A systematic review and meta\u2010analysis","volume":"17","author":"Infante\u2010Torres N","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_71_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06594-1","article-title":"Hazard and cumulative incidence of umbilical cord metabolic acidemia at birth in fetuses experiencing the second stage of labor and pathologic intrapartum fetal heart rate requiring expedited delivery","volume":"307","author":"Cavoretto PI","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen VM","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_73_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1556-5","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of deliveries in occiput posterior position when delayed pushing is practiced: A cohort study","volume":"17","author":"Dahlqvist K","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.003","article-title":"The maternal\u2010fetal medicine units cesarean registry: Chorioamnionitis at term and its duration \u2010 relationship to outcomes","volume":"191","author":"Rouse DJ","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_75_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s40471-013-0004-y","article-title":"Confounding by indication and related concepts","volume":"1","author":"Joseph KS","year":"2014","journal-title":"Curr Epidemiol Rep"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_76_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta\u2010analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger M","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_77_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2001.0252","article-title":"Vacuum\u2010assisted delivery","volume":"16","author":"Vacca A","year":"2002","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255981.86303.2b","article-title":"Neonatal complications of vacuum\u2010assisted delivery","volume":"109","author":"Simonson C","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.71152","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/ijgo.71152","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ijgo.71152","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T13:51:21Z","timestamp":1782741081000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ijgo.71152"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]]},"references-count":77,"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ijgo.71152"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.71152","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-12-01","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-06-01","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-06-29","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"ijgo.71152"}}