{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T16:13:06Z","timestamp":1791994386249,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,30]],"date-time":"2005-03-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1112140800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Applied Econometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We compare 330 ARCH\u2010type models in terms of their ability to describe the conditional variance. The models are compared out\u2010of\u2010sample using DM\u2013$ exchange rate data and IBM return data, where the latter is based on a new data set of realized variance. We find no evidence that a GARCH(1,1) is outperformed by more sophisticated models in our analysis of exchange rates, whereas the GARCH(1,1) is clearly inferior to models that can accommodate a leverage effect in our analysis of IBM returns. The models are compared with the test for superior predictive ability (SPA) and the reality check for data snooping (RC). Our empirical results show that the RC lacks power to an extent that makes it unable to distinguish \u2018good\u2019 and \u2018bad\u2019 models in our analysis. Copyright \u00a9 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/jae.800","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,30]],"date-time":"2005-03-30T06:47:03Z","timestamp":1112165223000},"page":"873-889","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1399,"title":["A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)?"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Peter R.","family":"Hansen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Asger","family":"Lunde","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_9_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0927-5398(97)00004-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2527343"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_4_1","volume-title":"Handbook of Financial Econometrics","author":"Andersen TG","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1391527"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9868.00282"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-1765(01)00572-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_8_1","unstructured":"BlackF.1976.Studies in stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Section American Statistical Association;177\u2013181."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(86)90063-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_10_1","first-page":"2961","volume-title":"Handbook of Econometrics","author":"Bollerslev T","year":"1994"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-7161(96)14010-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1392185"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0927-5398(93)90006-D"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-4076(97)00009-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.2307\/1912773","article-title":"Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation","volume":"45","author":"Engle RF","year":"1982","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/1469-7688\/1\/2\/305"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-405X(02)00259-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-405X(86)90004-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-1765(03)00192-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-4473-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2527081"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_23_1","unstructured":"HansenPR.2001. A test for superior predictive ability. Brown University Department of Economics Working Paper 2001\u201306 (http:\/\/www.econ.brown.edu\/fac\/Peter_Hansen)."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HansenPR.2003. Asymptotic tests of composite hypotheses. Brown University Department of Economics Working Paper 2003\u201309 (http:\/\/www.econ.brown.edu\/fac\/Peter_Hansen).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.399761"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_25_1","unstructured":"HansenPR LundeA.2001. Consistent ranking of volatility models (http:\/\/www.hha.dk\/\u223calunde\/academic\/research\/papers\/vola\u2010mod\u2010appendix.pdf)."},{"key":"e_1_2_9_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HansenPR LundeA.2003. Consistent preordering with an estimated criterion function with an application to the evaluation and comparison of volatility models. Brown University Working Paper 2003\u201301 (http:\/\/www.econ.brown.edu\/fac\/Peter_Hansen).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.388600"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0305-9049.2003.00086.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-405X(94)00821-H"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HolE KoopmanSJ.2002.Stock index volatility forecasting with high frequency data. Manuscript Department of Econometrics Free University of Amsterdam.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-5129-1_7"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1099-131X(200103)20:2<87::AID-FOR782>3.0.CO;2-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1255(200003\/04)15:2<117::AID-JAE550>3.0.CO;2-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/fut.10016"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jae.689"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266466600005296"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-4076(90)90101-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1994.10476870"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1257\/jel.41.2.478"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/rfs\/3.1.77"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_39_1","volume-title":"Modelling Financial Time Series","author":"Taylor SJ","year":"1986"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2171956"},{"key":"e_1_2_9_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00152"}],"container-title":["Journal of Applied Econometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjae.800","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jae.800","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,18]],"date-time":"2023-10-18T11:59:12Z","timestamp":1697630352000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jae.800"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,30]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jae.800"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jae.800","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0883-7252","1099-1255"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0883-7252","type":"print"},{"value":"1099-1255","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,3,30]]}}}