{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,19]],"date-time":"2026-09-19T15:09:31Z","timestamp":1789830571604,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,21]],"date-time":"2007-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1182384000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Applied Econometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This paper outlines a class of statistical procedures that permit testing of a broad range of multidimensional stochastic dominance hypotheses and, more generally, welfare hypotheses that rely upon multiple stochastic dominance conditions. We apply the procedures to data on income and leisure hours for individuals in Germany, the UK, and the USA. We find that no country first\u2010order stochastically dominates the others in both dimensions for all years of comparison. Furthermore, while in general the USA stochastically dominates Germany and the UK with respect to income, in most periods Germany stochastically dominates with respect to leisure hours. Finally, we find evidence that bivariate poverty (which refers, for example, to the working poor, that is, those who have little leisure and low income) is lower in Germany than in either the UK or the USA. On the other hand, poverty comparisons between the UK and the USA are sensitive to the subpopulation of individuals considered. Copyright \u00a9 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/jae.964","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,21]],"date-time":"2007-06-21T07:16:25Z","timestamp":1182410185000},"page":"951-969","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["International welfare comparisons and nonparametric testing of multivariate stochastic dominance"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Brian","family":"McCaig","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adonis","family":"Yatchew","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","unstructured":"AlesinaR GlaeserE SacerdoteB.2005.Work and leisure in the US and Europe: why so different?Discussion Paper 2068 Harvard Institute of Economic Research."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2171961"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2297269"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","unstructured":"BachH\u2010U KochS.2003.Working time and the volume of work in Germany: the IAB concept. IAB Labour Market Research Topics No. 53."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00390"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","unstructured":"BourguignonF ChakravartySR.2002.Multi\u2010dimensional poverty orderings. DELTA Working Paper 2002\u201322."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","unstructured":"CrawfordI.2005.A nonparametric test of stochastic dominance in multivariate distributions. Discussion Papers in Economics DP 12\/05 University of Surrey."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00167"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","unstructured":"DuclosJ\u2010Y SahnD YoungerSD.2004.Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. CIRPEE Working Paper No. 03\u201304."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1913475"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2004.08.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266466600008884"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","unstructured":"KlecanL McFaddenR McFaddenD.1991.A robust test for stochastic dominance. Mimeo MIT."},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","article-title":"French family values","author":"Krugman P","year":"2005","journal-title":"New York Times"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-937X.2005.00350.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07474930008800474"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4613-8922-4_7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","first-page":"2","article-title":"Why do Americans work so much more than Europeans?","volume":"28","author":"Prescott EC","year":"2004","journal-title":"Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SchettkatR.2003.Differences in US\u2013German time\u2010allocation: why do Americans work longer hours than Germans?IZA discussion paper no. 697.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.382820"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00949650310001593221"}],"container-title":["Journal of Applied Econometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjae.964","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jae.964","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,18]],"date-time":"2023-10-18T03:28:45Z","timestamp":1697599725000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jae.964"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,21]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jae.964"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jae.964","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0883-7252","1099-1255"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0883-7252","type":"print"},{"value":"1099-1255","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,6,21]]}}}