{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,12]],"date-time":"2023-11-12T07:10:11Z","timestamp":1699773011065},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,9,13]],"date-time":"2004-09-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1095033600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":10301,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Biomed. Mater. Res."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1976,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>A cementable endosteal blade implant has been developed and evaluated. Inherent in the design are the following factors: minimization of stress concentrators, ease of implantation, and high resistance to loosening. Other potential advantages of this design as compared with conventional endosteal blade implants include reduced hazards of postoperative infection and reduced likelihood of metallic corrosion.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Six conventional endosteal implants and six cementable implants were installed in steer mandibles using standard dental surgical techniques and Simplexbrand methyl methacrylate bone cement. They were loaded in uniaxial compression at a loading rate of 0.0122 in.\/min. The stiffness (S), deformation at 900\u2010lb load (D<jats:sub>900<\/jats:sub>), proportional limit (PL), and load at 0.04 in. deformation (L<jats:sub>0.04<\/jats:sub>) were calculated for each test.<\/jats:p><jats:p>The cementable design showed a twofold increase in stiffness, only 17% of the deformation at 900 lb, more than twice the proportional limit, and at least twice the load at 0.04 in. deformation when compared with similar values for the conventional endosteal implants.<\/jats:p><jats:p>This study reveals that, in addition to being unstable in bone, conventional endosteal implants are also unstable when used with acrylic bone cement. The new design should eliminate most of the problems associated with endosteal blade implantation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820100414","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,12,31]],"date-time":"2004-12-31T14:16:28Z","timestamp":1104502588000},"page":"571-581","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Design and biomechanical evaluation of a cementable endosteal blade implant"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"James","family":"Pugh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Weiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fredric","family":"Weiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Malkin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2004,9,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/S0011-8532(22)01854-7","volume":"14","author":"Linkow L. I.","year":"1970","journal-title":"Dent. Clin. N. Amer."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","volume-title":"Theories and Techniques of Oral Implantology","author":"Linkow L. I.","year":"1970"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-4220(73)90211-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. N.Cranin T. A.Dennison andP.Schnitman J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. No. 5 385(1974).","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820080418"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-4220(73)90121-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","volume-title":"Clinical Periodontology: The Periodontium in Health and Disease","author":"Glickman I.","year":"1959"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","volume-title":"Handbook of Orthodontics","author":"Moyers R. E.","year":"1969"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(74)90057-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(74)90180-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.archive.1974.0565"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820080419"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","volume-title":"Acrylic Cement in Orthopaedic Surgery","author":"Charnley J.","year":"1970"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(74)90037-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(74)90201-7"}],"container-title":["Journal of Biomedical Materials Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjbm.820100414","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jbm.820100414","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,12]],"date-time":"2023-11-12T06:51:35Z","timestamp":1699771895000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jbm.820100414"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1976,7]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1976,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jbm.820100414"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jbm.820100414","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-9304","1097-4636"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0021-9304","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-4636","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1976,7]]}}}