{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,10]],"date-time":"2026-08-10T18:39:30Z","timestamp":1786387170976,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]],"date-time":"2010-09-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1284336000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>The World Health Organization (WHO) Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) computes 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture from multiple risk factors, including femoral neck (FN) T-scores. Lumbar spine (LS) measurements are not currently part of the FRAX formulation but are used widely in clinical practice, and this creates confusion when there is spine-hip discordance. Our objective was to develop a hybrid 10-year absolute fracture risk assessment system in which nonvertebral (NV) fracture risk was assessed from the FN and clinical vertebral (V) fracture risk was assessed from the LS. We identified 37,032 women age 45 years and older undergoing baseline FN and LS dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; 1990\u20132005) from a population database that contains all clinical DXA results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Results were linked to longitudinal health service records for physician billings and hospitalizations to identify nontrauma vertebral and nonvertebral fracture codes after bone mineral density (BMD) testing. The population was randomly divided into equal-sized derivation and validation cohorts. Using the derivation cohort, three fracture risk prediction systems were created from Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for age and multiple FRAX risk factors): FN to predict combined all fractures, FN to predict nonvertebral fractures, and LS to predict vertebral (without nonvertebral) fractures. The hybrid system was the sum of nonvertebral risk from the FN model and vertebral risk from the LS model. The FN and hybrid systems were both strongly predictive of overall fracture risk (p\u2009&amp;lt;\u2009.001). In the validation cohort, ROC analysis showed marginally better performance of the hybrid system versus the FN system for overall fracture prediction (p\u2009=\u2009.24) and significantly better performance for vertebral fracture prediction (p\u2009&amp;lt;\u2009.001). In a discordance subgroup with FN and LS T-score differences greater than 1 SD, there was a significant improvement in overall fracture prediction with the hybrid method (p\u2009=\u2009.025). Risk reclassification under the hybrid system showed better alignment with observed fracture risk, with 6.4% of the women reclassified to a different risk category. In conclusion, a hybrid 10-year absolute fracture risk assessment system based on combining FN and LS information is feasible. The improvement in fracture risk prediction is small but supports clinical interest in a system that integrates LS in fracture risk assessment. \u00a9 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/jbmr.248","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]],"date-time":"2010-09-13T19:18:48Z","timestamp":1284405528000},"page":"460-467","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":42,"title":["Absolute fracture risk assessment using lumbar spine and femoral neck bone density measurements: Derivation and validation of a hybrid system"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"William D","family":"Leslie","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada"},{"name":"Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa M","family":"Lix","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"for the Manitoba Bone Density Program","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1948","DOI":"10.1002\/jbmr.95","article-title":"Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis","volume":"25","author":"Berger","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1007\/s001980170112","article-title":"The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds","volume":"12","author":"Kanis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-004-1780-5","article-title":"Assessment of fracture risk","volume":"16","author":"Kanis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-007-0543-5","article-title":"FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK","volume":"19","author":"Kanis","year":"2008","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1033","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-007-0343-y","article-title":"The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women","volume":"18","author":"Kanis","year":"2007","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1359\/JBMR.050304","article-title":"Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures","volume":"20","author":"Johnell","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1254","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.312.7041.1254","article-title":"Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures","volume":"312","author":"Marshall","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1955","DOI":"10.1359\/jbmr.2003.18.11.1955","article-title":"Does the combination of two BMD measurements improve fracture discrimination?","volume":"18","author":"Blake","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-005-0014-9","article-title":"The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis","volume":"17","author":"Kanis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1641","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.167.15.1641","article-title":"Single-site vs multisite bone density measurement for fracture prediction","volume":"167","author":"Leslie","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-004-1756-5","article-title":"A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service","volume":"16","author":"Leslie","year":"2005","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1385\/JCD:8:1:025","article-title":"Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database","volume":"8","author":"Leslie","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Clin Densitom."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1359\/JBMR.041115","article-title":"Recalculation of the NHANES Database SD Improves T-Score Agreement and Reduces Osteoporosis Prevalence","volume":"20","author":"Binkley","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bone.2007.11.001","article-title":"A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis","volume":"42","author":"Kanis","year":"2008","journal-title":"Bone."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1359\/JBMR.041134","article-title":"Interobserver reproducibility of criteria for vertebral body exclusion","volume":"20","author":"Hansen","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bone.2006.02.002","article-title":"The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice","volume":"39","author":"Leslie","year":"2006","journal-title":"Bone."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib17","first-page":"JS10","article-title":"Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system","volume":"37","author":"Roos","year":"1999","journal-title":"Med Care."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib18","volume-title":"Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment","author":"WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology","year":"2005"},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1152","DOI":"10.1345\/aph.18117","article-title":"Validation of an electronic, population-based prescription database","volume":"32","author":"Kozyrskyj","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ann Pharmacother."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1210\/jc.2006-1415","article-title":"Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice","volume":"92","author":"Leslie","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Endocrinol Metab."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2350","DOI":"10.1002\/jbmr.123","article-title":"Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: Fracture prediction and model calibration","volume":"25","author":"Leslie","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595","article-title":"Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach","volume":"44","author":"DeLong","year":"1988","journal-title":"Biometrics."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib23","first-page":"178","article-title":"Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada","volume":"56","author":"Siminoski","year":"2005","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00009","article-title":"Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables","volume":"149","author":"Janes","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-009-1034-7","article-title":"The potential impact of new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment patterns","volume":"21","author":"Dawson-Hughes","year":"2010","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1395","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-008-0712-1","article-title":"Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX((R))-assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK","volume":"19","author":"Kanis","year":"2008","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocd.2010.02.002","article-title":"Simplified 10-year absolute fracture risk assessment: a comparison of men and women","volume":"13","author":"Leslie","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Clin Densitom."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1385\/JCD:2:3:343","article-title":"Discordance in patient classification using T-scores","volume":"2","author":"Faulkner","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Clin Densitom."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1002\/jbmr.12","article-title":"Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool","volume":"25","author":"Tremollieres","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res."},{"key":"2024020318054927000_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e3181808c05","article-title":"Identification and validation of vertebral compression fractures using administrative claims data","volume":"47","author":"Curtis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med Care."}],"container-title":["Journal of Bone and Mineral Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjbmr.248","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbmr\/article-pdf\/26\/3\/460\/56558911\/248_ftp.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbmr\/article-pdf\/26\/3\/460\/56558911\/248_ftp.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,13]],"date-time":"2024-03-13T14:53:54Z","timestamp":1710341634000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jbmr\/article\/26\/3\/460-467\/7598097"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jbmr.248","relation":{},"ISSN":["0884-0431","1523-4681"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0884-0431","type":"print"},{"value":"1523-4681","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,13]]}}}