{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T00:30:39Z","timestamp":1789000239623,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,18]],"date-time":"2011-02-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1297987200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Clinical Ultrasound"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to evaluate the effect of three preparation types on the abdominal sonographic examination quality and on patient acceptance.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Examinations were performed on 611 patients in the imaging department of a referral oncology center. Patients were divided into three groups: preparation with fasting, water, laxatives, and antiflatulents (Group I), preparation with fasting, water, and antiflatulents alone (Group II), or preparation with fasting and water alone (Group III). The examination quality was evaluated both objectively through grades and subjectively through impressions. Statistical significance was set at the <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> \u2264 0.05 level.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>No difference in examination quality was seen among patients with or without medication. Improved visualization of the retroperitoneum in the mid abdomen was observed among Group I patients. Patients in Groups II and III displayed fewer side effects. Other variables, such as obesity and increased abdominal wall thickness, also impacted the image quality.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Visualization of the abdominal organs was satisfactory even in patients who had only fasted and received water. The use of laxative and antiflatulent preparations is not required before routine abdominal ultrasound examinations. \u00a9 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2011<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20790","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,18]],"date-time":"2011-02-18T18:26:28Z","timestamp":1298053588000},"page":"203-208","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Comparison of three types of preparations for abdominal sonography"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Paula N. V.","family":"Pinto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rubens","family":"Chojniak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcela P.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liao S.","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcony","family":"Queiroz\u2010Andrade","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Almir G. V.","family":"Bitencourt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1995.14.4.267"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.173.2.10430149"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1990.18.8.627"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","first-page":"456","volume-title":"Ultra\u2010Sonografia Abdominal","author":"Baroni RH","year":"2002"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2342-3-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","first-page":"147","article-title":"Shadowing and reverberation artifacts in abdominal ultrasonography","volume":"5","author":"Suramo I","year":"1985","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.157.2.3901114"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1986.5.4.227"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","first-page":"281","article-title":"A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90\u2010ml oral sodium phosphate with X\u2010Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy","volume":"61","author":"Unal S","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Gastroenterol Belg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","first-page":"628","article-title":"Does an antifoaming agent improve the quality of abdominal ultrasonography? A double\u2010blind study with special reference to the pancreas, the aorta and the para\u2010aortic region","volume":"23","author":"Lembcke B","year":"1985","journal-title":"Z Gastroenterol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870150705"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1177\/014107689508801114","article-title":"Iso\u2010osmotic bowel preparation improves the accuracy of iliac artery flow duplex examination","volume":"88","author":"Whiteley MS","year":"1995","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1078-5884(98)80188-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(95)70041-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","first-page":"1137","article-title":"Gastrointestinal gas","volume":"139","author":"Fardy J","year":"1988","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)15268-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1507\/endocrj.52.229"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.217.3.r00dc37780"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/133.2.307"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-51-605-387"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.140.3.7280248"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870210704"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Ultrasound"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjcu.20790","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jcu.20790","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,21]],"date-time":"2023-11-21T10:28:18Z","timestamp":1700562498000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jcu.20790"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,18]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jcu.20790"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jcu.20790","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0091-2751","1097-0096"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0091-2751","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-0096","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,18]]}}}