{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T00:35:38Z","timestamp":1782779738512,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,31]],"date-time":"2021-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617148800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Dental Education"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The outcome of assessments is determined by the standard\u2010setting method used. Standard setting is the process of deciding what is good enough. A cutoff score of 50% was commonly used in dental schools in Malaysia. This study aims to compare the conventional, norm\u2010referenced, and modified\u2010Angoff standard\u2010setting methods.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>The norm\u2010referenced method of standard setting was applied to the real scores of 40 final\u2010year dental students on a multiple\u2010choice question (MCQ), a short answer question (SAQ), and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). A panel of 10 judges set the standard using the modified\u2010Angoff method for the same paper in one sitting. One judge set the passing score of 10 OSCE questions after 2\u00a0weeks. A comparison of the grades and pass\/fail rates derived from the absolute standard, norm\u2010referenced, and modified\u2010Angoff methods was made. The intra\u2010rater and inter\u2010rater reliabilities of the modified\u2010Angoff method were assessed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The passing rate for the absolute standard was 100% (40\/40), for the norm\u2010referenced method it was 62.5% (25\/40), and for the modified\u2010Angoff method it was 80% (32\/40). The modified\u2010Angoff method had good inter\u2010rater reliability of 0.876 and excellent test\u2013retest reliability of 0.941.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>There were significant differences in the outcomes of these three standard\u2010setting methods, as shown by the difference in the proportion of candidates who passed and failed the assessment. The modified\u2010Angoff method was found to have good reliability for use with a professional qualifying dental examination.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/jdd.12600","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]],"date-time":"2021-04-01T00:23:34Z","timestamp":1617236614000},"page":"1210-1216","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["A comparison of different standard\u2010setting methods for professional qualifying dental examination"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"85","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9587-447X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aida N.A.","family":"Abd\u2010Rahman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Dentistry Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch, Sungai Buloh Campus  Jalan Hospital Sungai Buloh Selangor 47000 Malaysia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Izyan H.","family":"Baharuddin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Dentistry Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch, Sungai Buloh Campus  Jalan Hospital Sungai Buloh Selangor 47000 Malaysia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamed I.","family":"Abu\u2010Hassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Dentistry Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch, Sungai Buloh Campus  Jalan Hospital Sungai Buloh Selangor 47000 Malaysia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sally J.","family":"Davies","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Life Sciences &amp; Education University of South Wales  9 Graig Fach, Glyntaff Pontypridd Wales CF37 4BB United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","unstructured":"General Dental Council. Standards for education: standards and requirements for providers.2015:7\u201012."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-199208000-00001"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","first-page":"285","volume-title":"A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers","author":"Norcini JJ","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/h0049294"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00654.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2923.2000.00690.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","first-page":"111","volume-title":"Constructing Written Test Questions for the Basic and Clinical Sciences","year":"2001"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"164","article-title":"Comparison of two standards setting methods in a medical students MCQs exam in internal medicine","volume":"5","author":"Elfaki OA","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Med Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","first-page":"109","volume-title":"On Educational Testing","author":"Hofstee WKB","year":"1983"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01421590903196979"},{"issue":"10","key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S11","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-199610000-00062","article-title":"Standard setting in medical education","volume":"71","author":"Cusimano MD","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.2015.755"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","first-page":"220","volume-title":"Essential of Educational Measurement","author":"Ebel RL","year":"1991"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/001316445401400101"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","first-page":"508","volume-title":"Educational Measurement","author":"Angoff WH","year":"1971"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","first-page":"53","article-title":"Setting cut\u2010scores: a critical review of the Angoff and modified Angoff methods","volume":"52","author":"Ricker KL","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Educ Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1655","DOI":"10.4135\/9781506326139","volume-title":"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation","author":"Frey B","year":"2018"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01421590078526"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2923.2003.01495.x","article-title":"Setting standards on educational tests","volume":"37","author":"Norcini JJ","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"issue":"46","key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Standard setting: comparison of two methods","volume":"6","author":"George S","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"11","key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V37N11p957","article-title":"Standard setting in student assessment: is a defensible method yet to come?","volume":"37","author":"Barman A","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singap"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/0142159X.2013.853119"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","first-page":"34","article-title":"Standard setting in medical education: fundamental concepts and emerging challenges","volume":"28","author":"Hejri S","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med J Islam Repub Iran"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/s15324818ame1001_3"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00451.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/00131649921970233"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","first-page":"15","volume-title":"Passing Scores: A Manual for Setting Standards of Performance on Educational and Occupational Tests","author":"Livingston SA","year":"1982"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","first-page":"20","article-title":"Setting passing scores","volume":"15","author":"Cizek GJ","year":"1996","journal-title":"Educ Measure"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2923.1999.00487.x"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.7196\/AJHPE.2017.v9i4.631","article-title":"Implementing the Angoff method of standard setting using postgraduate students: practical and affordable in resource limited settings","volume":"9","author":"Mubuuke AG","year":"2017","journal-title":"Afr J Health Prof Educ"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2273.2006.00308.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","first-page":"11","volume-title":"A Primer on Setting Cut Scores on Tests of Educational Achievement","author":"Zeiky M","year":"2006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_34_1","first-page":"701","volume-title":"Educational Measurement","author":"Clauser BE","year":"2006"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_6_35_1","first-page":"42","article-title":"Comparism of cut\u2010off scores using two setting methods","volume":"5","author":"Iweka F","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Quanti Quali Res Met"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00291.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_37_1","first-page":"14","article-title":"Standard\u2010setting methods as measurement processes","volume":"29","author":"Nichols P","year":"2010","journal-title":"Educ Measure"}],"container-title":["Journal of Dental Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jdd.12600","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/jdd.12600","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jdd.12600","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,29]],"date-time":"2023-08-29T21:09:29Z","timestamp":1693343369000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jdd.12600"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,31]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jdd.12600"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jdd.12600","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-0337","1930-7837"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-0337","type":"print"},{"value":"1930-7837","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-11-03","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-02-28","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-03-31","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}