{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,5]],"date-time":"2026-07-05T04:48:03Z","timestamp":1783226883845,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,19]],"date-time":"2003-02-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1045612800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Magnetic Resonance Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare the accuracy of fluoro\u201018\u2010deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG\u2010PET) and dynamic\u2010enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in the diagnosis of liver metastatic lesions from colon and other sources.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Thirty consecutive patients with known or suspected metastatic lesions were scanned by both MRI and PET. Histopathology and\/or clinical outcome, including cross\u2010sectional imaging follow up, were used as a gold standard.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Of 30 patients, 16 were positive by pathology and\/or clinical outcome and 14 were negative for liver metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values on MRI were 85.7%, 100%, 100%, and 89%, respectively, compared to 71%, 93.7%, 90.9%, and 79% on FDG\u2010PET. The difference between the two methods was not significant (X<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup> = 0.2, P &gt; 0.05).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our study showed no significant difference in detection of liver metastases using MRI or FDG\u2010PET. However, MRI has advantages in spatial resolution and lesion characterization. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:343\u2013349. \u00a9 2003 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.10265","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,20]],"date-time":"2003-02-20T14:04:22Z","timestamp":1045749862000},"page":"343-349","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":51,"title":["Comparison of MR and PET imaging for the evaluation of liver metastases"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Ming","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diego R.","family":"Martin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nevzat","family":"Karabulut","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mathis P.","family":"Frick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11938-999-0018-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.213.1.r99oc3386"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.185.1.1326119"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)80067-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.1057"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/S1064-9689(21)00274-9","article-title":"Imaging of benign and malignant focal liver lesions","volume":"9","author":"Martin DR","year":"2001","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1177\/000313489906501220","article-title":"The use of FDG\u2010positron emission tomography for the evaluation of colorectal metastases of the liver","volume":"65","author":"Boykin KN","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","first-page":"1196","article-title":"Staging recurrent metastatic colorectal carcinoma with PET","volume":"38","author":"Delbeke D","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006231-200009000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.191.2.8153308"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.200.3.8756932"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(99)00187-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.174.4.1741005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s003300050779"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.178.3.1780762b"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.177.2.1770343"}],"container-title":["Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjmri.10265","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jmri.10265","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,14]],"date-time":"2023-10-14T14:03:31Z","timestamp":1697292211000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jmri.10265"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,19]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jmri.10265"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jmri.10265","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1053-1807","1522-2586"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1053-1807","type":"print"},{"value":"1522-2586","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,19]]}}}