{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T02:45:14Z","timestamp":1790390714388,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,19]],"date-time":"2011-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1313712000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal Orthopaedic Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Suture anchors and screws are commonly used for fixation of humeral greater tuberosity (GT) fractures in either arthroscopic or open surgeries, but no biomechanical studies have been performed to compare the strength of fixation constructs using these two implants. This cadaveric study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength of three different fixation constructs in the management of GT fractures: Double\u2010Row Suture Anchor Fixation (DR); Suture\u2010Bridge Technique using suture anchors and knotless suture anchors (SB); and Two\u2010Screw Fixation (TS). The experimental procedure was designed to assess fracture displacement after cyclic loading, failure load, and failure mode of the fixation construct. Significant differences were found among the SB (321\u2009N), DR (263\u2009N), and TS (187\u2009N) groups (SB\u2009&gt;\u2009DR\u2009&gt;\u2009TS,\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.05) in the mean force of cyclic loading to create 3\u2009mm displacement. Regarding the mean force of cyclic loading to create 5\u2009mm displacement and ultimate failure load, no significant difference was found between the DR (370\u2009N, 480\u2009N) and SB (399\u2009N, 493\u2009N) groups, but both groups achieved superior results compared with the TS group (249\u2009N, 340\u2009N) (\n                    <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). The results suggested that the suture anchor constructs would be stronger than the fixation construct using screws for the humeral GT fracture. \u00a9 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 30:423\u2013428, 2012\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.21530","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,20]],"date-time":"2011-08-20T05:50:47Z","timestamp":1313819447000},"page":"423-428","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Suture anchor versus screw fixation for greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus\u2014a biomechanical study"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Cheng\u2010Li","family":"Lin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chih\u2010Kai","family":"Hong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"I\u2010Ming","family":"Jou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chii\u2010Jeng","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fong\u2010Chin","family":"Su","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wei\u2010Ren","family":"Su","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(02)86811-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173080-00011"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","first-page":"171","article-title":"A new suggestion for the treatment of minimally displaced fractures of the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus","volume":"56","author":"Park TS","year":"1997","journal-title":"Bull Hosp Jt Dis"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197052060-00001"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.83B7.10516"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2006.06.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.04.051"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200710000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.08.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2009.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.01.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.11.029"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(02)00032-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(04)00810-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ta.0000233710.42698.3f"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.07.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","first-page":"98","article-title":"Fixation of greater tuberosity fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three techniques","volume":"63","author":"Ishak C","year":"2006","journal-title":"Bull Hosp Jt Dis"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(01)00058-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2007.03.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(00)90133-6"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjor.21530","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjor.21530","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jor.21530","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,9]],"date-time":"2023-10-09T15:51:15Z","timestamp":1696866675000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jor.21530"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,19]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jor.21530"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.21530","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0736-0266","1554-527X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0736-0266","type":"print"},{"value":"1554-527X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-04-14","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2011-07-25","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2011-08-19","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}