{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T01:46:42Z","timestamp":1790905602701,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,20]],"date-time":"2006-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1153353600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5498,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Surgical Oncology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 304 patients with pancreatoduodenal carcinoma were studied clinicopathologically and immunohistochemically in order to clarify features of carcinoma of four different sites of origin; carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (Am), the distal common bile duct (DCBD), the head of the pancreas (PH), and the extra\u2010ampullary duodenum (Du). The mean greatest diameter of 87 PH was 3.5 cm compared with 2.7 cm of 149 Am and 2.7 cm of DCBD. Histopathologically, 40% of Am were papillary adenocarcinoma, while about half of DCBD, PH and Du were tubular adenocarcinoma. PH invaded lymphatic (85%), vascular (62%), and perineural (95%) spaces and metastasized lymph nodes (72%) more frequently than Am (77%, 35%, 24%, 50%), DCBD (47%, 61%, 65%, 45%), and Du (76%, 29%, 35%, 65%), respectively. More than 50% of PH invaded the resected margins, whereas in only 2% of Am, the surgical margins were affected by malignant cells. Immunohistochemically, PH was more frequently positive for both carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (98%) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19\u20109 (91%) than Am (83%, 62%), DCBD (94%, 58%), and Du (56%, 11%), respectively. The stromal staining type of CEA and CA19\u20109 was more frequently seen in PH (27%, 44%) than in Am (9%, 31%), DCBD (11%, 8%) and Du (0%, 0%), showing a more dedifferentiated nature of PH. The cumulative 3\u2010year survival rate of 87 patients with PH (15%) was worse than that of 149 with Am (42%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), of 51 with DCBD (25%) and of 17 with Du (58%, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). The survival curve of 87 with PH was worse than that of 51 with DCBD, of 149 with Am (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and of 17 with Du (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Cox regression analysis, using eleven profound prognostic variables, revealed that venous invasion, perineural infiltration, surgical margin, and histopathologic type were profound pronostic factors. Pancreatic carcinoma has a more dedifferentiated histopathologic nature, showing a more aggressive growth and fares worse than Am, DCBD, and Du.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.2930470303","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,20]],"date-time":"2007-02-20T12:11:28Z","timestamp":1171973488000},"page":"148-154","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":79,"title":["Pancreatoduodenal carcinoma: A clinicopathologic study of 304 patients and immunohistochemical observation for CEA and CA19\u20109"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Koji","family":"Yamaguchi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Munetomo","family":"Enjoji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masazumi","family":"Tsuneyoshi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,7,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19870201)59:3<506::AID-CNCR2820590326>3.0.CO;2-#"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0016-5085(87)90627-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","first-page":"14","article-title":"Carcinoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathologic study of 96 cases with immunohistochemical observations","volume":"19","author":"Yamaguchi K","year":"1989","journal-title":"Jpn J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01658480"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/29.4.6166661"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","first-page":"79","volume-title":"Pancreatic Pathology","author":"Kl\u00f6ppel G","year":"1986"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","first-page":"203","volume-title":"The Pathology of Incipient Neoplasia","author":"Albores\u2010Saavedra J","year":"1986"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","series-title":"Second series","volume-title":"Atlas of Tumor Pathology","author":"Cubilla AL","year":"1985"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","first-page":"544","article-title":"Experience with 647 consecutive tumors of the duodenum, ampulla, head of the pancreas and distal common bile duct","volume":"210","author":"Michelassi F","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1990.01410180041008"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(05)81244-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","first-page":"467","article-title":"Pancreatoduodenal resection for pancreatic or periampullary tumors\u2014a ten\u2010year experience","volume":"36","author":"Ceuterick M","year":"1989","journal-title":"Hepatogastroenterology"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","first-page":"478","article-title":"Current status of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma","volume":"36","author":"Crist DW","year":"1989","journal-title":"Hepatogastroenterology"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1973.01350180047015"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-197902000-00001"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6109(16)38543-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(76)90087-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.37.2.218"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19860415)57:8<1576::AID-CNCR2820570823>3.0.CO;2-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0016-5085(86)90930-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.1986.35"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19860401)57:7<1324::AID-CNCR2820570712>3.0.CO;2-A"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00707694"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.1986.34"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00389242"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19850101)55:1<136::AID-CNCR2820550121>3.0.CO;2-P"}],"container-title":["Journal of Surgical Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjso.2930470303","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jso.2930470303","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,23]],"date-time":"2023-10-23T02:06:49Z","timestamp":1698026809000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jso.2930470303"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1991,7]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jso.2930470303"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.2930470303","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-4790","1096-9098"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-4790","type":"print"},{"value":"1096-9098","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1991,7]]}}}