{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,11]],"date-time":"2023-09-11T20:51:26Z","timestamp":1694465486793},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,24]],"date-time":"2018-09-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1537747200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of Ultrasound Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to identify clinical indications in which endometrial sampling was performed under transabdominal ultrasound (US) guidance and to evaluate the outcomes of this approach in an academic practice.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We retrieved data from the electronic medical record for all patients referred to the gynecologic US unit for transabdominal US\u2010guided endometrial sampling from January 2011 to June 2017. Data retrieved included age, parity, previous cesarean delivery or pelvic surgery, indication for endometrial biopsy, US abnormalities, clinical reasoning for US\u2010guided sampling, and pathologic reports.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 113 patients were referred for US\u2010guided sampling between January 2011 and June 2017. We identified the following reasons for US\u2010guided biopsy referral: failed blind biopsy attempt, fibroids, uterine position or anomaly, need for targeted sampling, cervical stenosis, and other indications. Ninety\u2010five of the 113 patients (84%) underwent successful US\u2010guided endometrial sampling. Forty of the 113 patients were referred after a failed blind biopsy, with 83% subsequently undergoing successful US\u2010guided endometrial sampling. Of the 30 patients referred for fibroids, 29 (97%) underwent successful US\u2010guided sampling. High success rates were also noted for transabdominal US guidance referrals for the uterine position or anomaly (86%) and the need for targeted sampling (83%).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our results suggest that endometrial sampling performed under US guidance could be considered for patients with a failed blind approach, fibroids, uterine anomalies, and interest in targeted sampling. In such cases, US\u2010guided sampling could be considered before surgical options.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14800","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,25]],"date-time":"2018-09-25T04:15:05Z","timestamp":1537848905000},"page":"1223-1227","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Sonographically Guided Office Endometrial Sampling: Indications and Results"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Anoushka","family":"Dua","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School  New Brunswick New Jersey USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Susan","family":"Egan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School  New Brunswick New Jersey USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adrian","family":"Balica","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School  New Brunswick New Jersey USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","volume-title":"Te Linde's Operative Gynecology","author":"Rock JA","year":"2008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18410\/jebmh\/2017\/642"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","first-page":"954","article-title":"Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma","volume":"77","author":"Stovall TG","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.12.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7314\/APJCP.2015.16.12.4971"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2016.11.041"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.22360"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-013-0825-1","article-title":"Ultrasound examination before, during, and after office endometrial sampling","volume":"11","author":"Bosch T","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01088.x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fjum.14800","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jum.14800","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/jum.14800","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jum.14800","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,10]],"date-time":"2023-09-10T22:40:20Z","timestamp":1694385620000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jum.14800"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,24]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jum.14800"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jum.14800","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0278-4297","1550-9613"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0278-4297","type":"print"},{"value":"1550-9613","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-05-05","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-07-27","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-09-24","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}