{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,19]],"date-time":"2026-09-19T16:12:14Z","timestamp":1789834334091,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J of Ultrasound Medicine"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the performance of 3 fetal growth standards\u2014Hadlock, the Asian standards of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD.a), and Hong Kong standards\u2014in predicting small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age (SGA) infants and associated adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) in a Southern Chinese population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective multicenter cohort study of 2763 singleton pregnancies (28\u201340\u2009weeks). Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated using the Hadlock formula, and SGA was defined as EFW &lt;10th percentile for gestational age and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to assess the predictive capability of each growth standard. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of APO.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>NICHD.a standards showed the highest overall predictive performance for SGA infants (AUC\u2009=\u20090.801), similar to Hadlock standards (AUC\u2009=\u20090.801) and higher Hong Kong standards (AUC\u2009=\u20090.788). For APO, NICHD.a had higher sensitivity; Hong Kong had higher specificity. Independent APO predictors included maternal age, nulliparity, IVF\u2010ET, and umbilical artery abnormality.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>NICHD.a fetal growth standards were more effective than both Hadlock and Hong Kong standards in predicting SGA infants and associated APO in this Southern Chinese cohort.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.70438","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T02:56:06Z","timestamp":1788317766000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of Fetal Growth Standards for Predicting Small\u2010for\u2010Gestational\u2010Age Infants and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1002","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-1420-6900","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xia","family":"Yin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat\u2010sen University  Guangzhou China"},{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province  Kunming China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhong\u2010ying","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province  Kunming China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cui\u2010yi","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine Foshan Nanhai District People's Hospital  Foshan China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu\u2010mei","family":"He","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province  Kunming China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiao","family":"Ni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province  Kunming China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mei","family":"Gu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province  Kunming China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rong\u2010ping","family":"Ning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province  Kunming China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8548-9663","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ruan","family":"Peng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ultrasonic Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat\u2010sen University  Guangzhou China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224.e221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.04.033","article-title":"Validity of a Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn for identifying neonatal morbidity","volume":"232","author":"Monier I","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547.e541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.05.026","article-title":"Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH\u201021st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index","volume":"229","author":"Gardosi J","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"494.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.06.016","article-title":"Assessment of risk for small for gestational age at midgestation to define subsequent care","volume":"233","author":"Papastefanou I","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","first-page":"334.e331","article-title":"An application of group\u2010based trajectory modeling to define fetal growth phenotypes among small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age births in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study","volume":"228","author":"Bommarito PA","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"496.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.05.017","article-title":"Small for gestational age subgroups have differential morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment at age 2: the INTERBIO\u201021(st) Newborn Study","volume":"233","author":"Papageorghiou AT","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447.e441","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.06.007","article-title":"Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with \u201csmall\u201d fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction","volume":"229","author":"Powel JE","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329.e321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.04.041","article-title":"Antenatal diagnosis of early\u2010onset small for gestational age: absolute and relative risks of adverse outcomes","volume":"233","author":"Liauw J","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85.e81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.07.009","article-title":"Fetal insular measurements in pregnancy with estimated fetal weight <10th centile and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes","volume":"230","author":"Putra M","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high\u2010risk pregnancies","volume":"6","author":"Alfirevic Z","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock FP","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.06.042","article-title":"Ethnicity\u2010specific birthweight distributions improve identification of term newborns at risk for short\u2010term morbidity","volume":"209","author":"Hanley GE","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5192","article-title":"Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length","volume":"31","author":"Leung TN","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15959","article-title":"Prediction of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age neonate by third\u2010trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound\u2010delivery interval","volume":"49","author":"Reboul Q","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002923","article-title":"Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: an Australian state\u2010wide retrospective cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Pritchard NL","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15954","article-title":"Fetal size monitoring and birth\u2010weight prediction: a new population\u2010based approach","volume":"49","author":"Gjessing HK","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.004","article-title":"Evidence\u2010based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy","volume":"218","author":"McCowan LM","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"Salomon LJ","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.24888","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid\u2010trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"59","author":"Salomon LJ","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26206","article-title":"Peripheral cord insertion is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome only when accompanied by clinically significant placental pathology","volume":"62","author":"Stapleton D","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26047","article-title":"Association of placental and umbilical cord characteristics with cerebral palsy: national cohort study","volume":"61","author":"Ebbing C","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"H1021","DOI":"10.1152\/ajpheart.00791.2016","article-title":"Ultrasound detection of altered placental vascular morphology based on hemodynamic pulse wave reflection","volume":"312","author":"Rahman A","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495.e491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.008","article-title":"Size and shape of the four\u2010chamber view of the fetal heart in fetuses with an estimated fetal weight less than the tenth centile","volume":"221","author":"Hobbins JC","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130.e131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.03.025","article-title":"The association between discordant umbilical arterial resistance in growth\u2010restricted fetuses and adverse outcomes","volume":"231","author":"Rottenstreich M","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","first-page":"QC05","article-title":"Evaluation of maternal and perinatal outcomes of induction in borderline oligohydramnios at term","volume":"11","author":"Rathod S","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03549-3","article-title":"Amniotic fluid disorders and the effects on prenatal outcome: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"21","author":"Bakhsh H","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.09.024","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight using Hadlock's formulas: is head circumference an essential parameter?","volume":"243","author":"Dakwar Shaheen J","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2439","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07680-2","article-title":"A novel software for method comparison: MCS (method comparison software)\u2010assessing agreement between estimated fetal weights calculated by Hadlock I\u2010V formulas and birth weight","volume":"310","author":"Yasar S","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1186636","article-title":"Update on the birth weight standard and its diagnostic value in small for gestational age (SGA) infants in China","volume":"30","author":"Chen Y","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.214","article-title":"Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population\u2010based cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Sandstrom A","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinatol: official journal of the California Perinatal Association"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1186\/s13031-020-00297-7","article-title":"Morbidities & outcomes of a neonatal intensive care unit in a complex humanitarian conflict setting, Hajjah Yemen: 2017\u20102018","volume":"14","author":"Eze P","year":"2020","journal-title":"Confl Health"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.008","article-title":"Comparison of SGA and severe SGA rates using six size standards \u2013 is there a difference?","volume":"301","author":"Alter R","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0000000000001399","article-title":"A new approach for classifying fetal growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"Hutcheon JA","year":"2021","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1007\/s00431-016-2740-8","article-title":"Defining small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age: prescriptive versus descriptive birthweight standards","volume":"175","author":"Hoftiezer L","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Pediatr"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1969","DOI":"10.1097\/CM9.0000000000002335","article-title":"Which fetal growth charts should be used? A retrospective observational study in China","volume":"135","author":"Zhao J","year":"2022","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1097\/FM9.0000000000000157","article-title":"Establishing Chinese fetal growth standards: why and how","volume":"4","author":"Zeng X","year":"2022","journal-title":"Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.03.032","article-title":"Revisiting the Hadlock 1991 population reference for estimated fetal weight","volume":"233","author":"Roberts AW","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2825","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1671339","article-title":"Uric acid levels in gestational hypertensive women predict preeclampsia and outcome of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age infants","volume":"34","author":"Zhao X","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100599","article-title":"Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight\u2010derived standard for short\u2010term neonatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"4","author":"Blue NR","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0323470","article-title":"Classification of very low birth weight infants as small for gestational age: international vs. national standards","volume":"20","author":"Tejon\u2010Fernandez M","year":"2025","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00431-022-04592-8","article-title":"Neonatal hypoglycaemia and body proportionality in small for gestational age newborns: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"181","author":"Smits I","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Pediatr"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1007\/s12098-019-02925-4","article-title":"Morbidity patterns of late preterm babies born small for gestation","volume":"86","author":"Mallick AK","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Pediatr"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1186\/s12902-024-01700-7","article-title":"Risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia: a meta\u2010analysis","volume":"24","author":"Wang D","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMC Endocr Disord"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.10.008","article-title":"Day\u2010specific standard for fetal growth percentiles in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies\u2010Singletons","volume":"234","author":"Grantz KL","year":"2026","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1725","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.09087","article-title":"Ultrasound quality assurance for singletons in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies","volume":"35","author":"Hediger ML","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/2625242","article-title":"Student competency for midtrimester obstetrics scan upon completion of the master's degree in medical sonography","volume":"2022","author":"Hairunpijit S","year":"2022","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2375","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.16572","article-title":"Impact of sonographer experience, insonation angle, and bladder filling on uterine artery Doppler measurements in the first trimester of pregnancy","volume":"43","author":"Einig S","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21909","article-title":"Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small\u2010 and large\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age fetuses","volume":"55","author":"Wright D","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338.e331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.12.034","article-title":"Comparing population\u2010based fetal growth standards in a US cohort","volume":"231","author":"Gleason JL","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2440","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1667327","article-title":"Fetal growth standards for Somali population","volume":"34","author":"Mustafa HJ","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jum.70438","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/jum.70438","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/jum.70438","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T02:56:22Z","timestamp":1788317782000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/jum.70438"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]},"references-count":49,"alternative-id":["10.1002\/jum.70438"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jum.70438","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0278-4297","1550-9613"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0278-4297","type":"print"},{"value":"1550-9613","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-05-27","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-08-19","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-09-01","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"jum.70438"}}