{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T21:54:35Z","timestamp":1788990875575,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":1370,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>It is challenging to discuss the use of high-risk organs with patients, in part because of the lack of information about how patients view this topic. This study was designed to determine how patients think about organ quality and to test formats for risk communication. Semistructured interviews of 10 patients on the waiting list revealed limited understanding about the spectrum of organ quality and a reluctance to consider anything but the best organs. A computerized quantitative survey was then conducted with an interactive graph to elicit the risk of graft failure that patients would accept. Fifty-eight percent of the 95 wait-listed patients who completed the survey would accept only organs with a risk of graft failure of 25% or less at 3 years, whereas 18% would accept only organs with the lowest risk possible (19% at 3 years). Risk tolerance was increased when the organ quality was presented relative to average organs rather than the best organs and when feedback was provided about the implications for organ availability. More than three-quarters of the patients reported that they wanted an equal or dominant role in organ acceptance decisions. Men tended to prefer lower risk organs (mean acceptable risk = 29%) in comparison with women (mean acceptable risk = 35%, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic> = 0.04), but risk tolerance was not associated with other demographic or clinical characteristics (eg, the severity of liver disease). In summary, patients want to be involved in decisions about organ quality. Patients' risk tolerance varies widely, and their acceptance of high-risk organs can be facilitated if we present the risks of graft failure with respect to average organs and provide feedback about the implications for organ availability. Liver Transpl, 2011. \u00a9 2011 AASLD.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/lt.22437","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,9,19]],"date-time":"2011-09-19T19:08:35Z","timestamp":1316459315000},"page":"1387-1393","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Patient Decision Making About Organ Quality in Liver Transplantation\u2020"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Michael L.","family":"Volk","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rachel S.","family":"Tocco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shawn J.","family":"Pelletier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brian J.","family":"Zikmund-Fisher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna S. F.","family":"Lok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783790","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x","article-title":"Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.","volume":"6","author":"Feng","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"issue":"pt 2","key":"R2-4-20250124","first-page":"973986","article-title":"Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 19992008.","volume":"10","author":"Klein","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"key":"R3-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28322837","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb0800674","article-title":"Informing candidates for solidorgan transplantation about donor risk factors.","volume":"358","author":"Halpern","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R6-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773782","DOI":"10.1023\/B:QURE.0000021685.83961.88","article-title":"Health status versus utilities of patients with endstage liver disease.","volume":"13","author":"Bryce","year":"2004","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"R7-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160170","DOI":"10.1177\/109019817800600107","article-title":"Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales.","volume":"6","author":"Wallston","year":"1978","journal-title":"Health Educ Monogr"},{"key":"R8-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456467","DOI":"10.1108\/14777260610701812","article-title":"Researching medical trust in the United States.","volume":"20","author":"Hall","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Health Organ Manag"},{"key":"R9-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10631070","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.54.6.1063","article-title":"Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.","volume":"54","author":"Watson","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"R10-4-20250124","first-page":"663671","article-title":"Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.","volume":"27","author":"ZikmundFisher","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"R11-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.023","article-title":"The impact of the format of graphical presentation on healthrelated knowledge and treatment choices.","volume":"73","author":"Hawley","year":"2008","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"R12-4-20250124","first-page":"209214","article-title":"Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.","volume":"73","author":"ZikmundFisher","year":"2008","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"R14-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730742","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2004.12.016","article-title":"Association of patient autonomy with increased transplantation and survival among new dialysis patients in the United States.","volume":"45","author":"Stack","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Kidney Dis"},{"key":"R15-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6973","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1399-0012.2002.00111.x","article-title":"Compliance and late acute rejection after kidney transplantation: a psychomedical perspective.","volume":"16","author":"Baines","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Transplant"},{"key":"R16-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333337","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)69078-8","article-title":"Shared decision making in deceaseddonor transplantation.","volume":"368","author":"Ross","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"R17-4-20250124","first-page":"S47S56","article-title":"Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication.","volume":"31","author":"Fagerlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Health Behav"},{"key":"R18-4-20250124","first-page":"107124","article-title":"Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence.","volume":"13","author":"ZikmundFisher","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Health Commun"},{"key":"R19-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2007.08.008","article-title":"If Im better than average, then Im ok?: comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits.","volume":"69","author":"Fagerlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"R20-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17051711","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-6143.2011.03592.x","article-title":"Patients willingness to accept expanded criteria donor liver transplantation.","volume":"11","author":"Rodrigue","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"key":"R21-4-20250124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416420","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-6143.2009.02931.x","article-title":"Centers for Disease Control highrisk donors and kidney utilization.","volume":"10","author":"Duan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"}],"container-title":["Liver Transplantation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Flt.22437","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/01445473-201112000-00004","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,24]],"date-time":"2025-01-24T17:12:10Z","timestamp":1737738730000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/01445473-201112000-00004"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lt.22437","relation":{},"ISSN":["1527-6465"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1527-6465","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}}}