{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,23]],"date-time":"2023-10-23T06:11:13Z","timestamp":1698041473734},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,19]],"date-time":"2005-10-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1129680000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":6135,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Microsurgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Forty\u2010two female Wistar rats were used in a long\u2010term study designed to evaluate the functional sequelae of employing 10\u20100 Dexon \u201cS\u201d and nylon microsutures in uterine anastomoses. Functional criteria used were the number of fetuses and live births, during and after pregnancy, respectively. Results indicate that the rats from both control and experimental groups were likely to have identical litter sizes for the first 3 deliveries (P &gt; 0.01). An unexplained observation was the finding of a larger litter size for the experimental group rats at the fourth delivery as compared to its control counterpart (P &lt; 0.01). Also explicit is the propensity for the right uterine horn to bear a larger number of fetuses than its counterpart (P &lt; 0.01). Finally, neither suture was associated with a larger number of fetuses (P &gt; 0.01). It was concluded that 1) uterine anastomosis did not prove detrimental to the functional outcome, 2) none of the sutures proved functionally superior, and 3) nylon was more likely to be associated with foreign body and inflammatory responses.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/micr.1920100308","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,4]],"date-time":"2007-03-04T19:05:40Z","timestamp":1173035140000},"page":"183-188","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparative functional study of dexon and nylon microsutures in rat uterine anastomoses"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Milbhor","family":"D'silva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Raphael","family":"Durfee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Wolf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sun","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,10,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820050207"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","first-page":"129","article-title":"The analysis of replicated experiments when field results are incomplete","volume":"1","author":"Yates F","year":"1933","journal-title":"Emp J Exp Agricult"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)42920-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-4295(82)90469-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/micr.1920040210"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/micr.1920050305"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/micr.1920050104"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/micr.1920070407"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","first-page":"401","article-title":"The use of a new synthetic absorbable monofilament suture polydioxanone (PDS), for surgery (abstract)","volume":"39","author":"Decherney A","year":"1983","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)42919-5","article-title":"Comparison of two techniques of suturing in microsurgical anastomosis of the rabbit oviduct","volume":"28","author":"Seki K","year":"1977","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)43462-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","first-page":"56","article-title":"Histologic reactions to polyglactic\u2010910, polyethylene and nylon microsuture","volume":"25","author":"Gomel V","year":"1980","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)47245-6","article-title":"Histologic reaction to four synthetic microsutures in the rabbit","volume":"40","author":"Delbecke LO","year":"1983","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","first-page":"615","article-title":"Histologic response to microsuture materials","volume":"33","author":"Beauchamp PI","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90416-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)47071-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_2","first-page":"662","article-title":"Adhesion prophylaxis in rabbits with surgical and two absorbable microsurgical sutures","volume":"28","author":"Galan N","year":"1983","journal-title":"I Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00680.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)50014-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)49470-7","article-title":"Pulsed CO2 laser versus conventional microsurgical anastomosis of the rat uterine horn","volume":"46","author":"Badawy SZA","year":"1986","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)40629-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59546-6"}],"container-title":["Microsurgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fmicr.1920100308","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/micr.1920100308","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,22]],"date-time":"2023-10-22T03:45:44Z","timestamp":1697946344000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/micr.1920100308"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/micr.1920100308"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/micr.1920100308","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0738-1085","1098-2752"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0738-1085","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-2752","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]}}}