{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T23:15:31Z","timestamp":1785539731480,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,17]],"date-time":"2008-12-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1229472000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Neurourology and Urodynamics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title><jats:p>To review the quality of urodynamic traces collected as part of a multi\u2010center Phase II drug trial of a medication for overactive bladder (OAB), in order to assess adherence to the Good Urodynamic Practice (GUP) guidelines. To assess inter\u2010rater reliability (IRR) for the numerical cystometrogram variables, and for the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Two central reviewers assessed 50 cystometrograms, recording the presence or absence of DO and assessing compliance with GUP guidelines. Three central reviewers independently assessed 20% of cystometrograms submitted, for numerical variables. IRR of central and peripheral assessments were compared with intra\u2010class correlation (ICC) and Cohen's unweighted kappa statistics.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>There was inconsistent adherence to GUP guidelines, because of differences in urodynamic equipment and practice. ICC between numerical variables assessed by the three central reviewers were excellent ranging between 0.830 and 0.997 (P all \u22640.001). ICC between numerical variables assessed by peripheral and central reviewers were good to excellent, ranging between 0.624 and 0.994 (P all \u22640.05). Central reviewers showed excellent agreement in the assessment of DO (kappa\u2009=\u20090.83). However central and peripheral reviewers showed poor agreement in the assessment of DO (kappa\u2009=\u20090.24).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Without standardization of equipment and training, adherence to GUP guidelines is problematic. Cystometric pressure and volume variables can however be reliably assessed in multi\u2010center studies. DO cannot be reliably observed by interpreting the cystometrogram trace in isolation. Objective assessment of DO may therefore be unsuitable for multi\u2010center studies reliant on central reporting of traces. Neurourol. Urodynam. 28:380\u2013384, 2009. \u00a9 2008 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20679","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,19]],"date-time":"2008-12-19T13:44:58Z","timestamp":1229694298000},"page":"380-384","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Quality control in urodynamics: Analysis of an international multi\u2010center study"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Arasee","family":"Renganathan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rufus","family":"Cartwright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Linda","family":"Cardozo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dudley","family":"Robinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sushma","family":"Srikrishna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","volume-title":"Incontinence 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence June","author":"Griffiths D","year":"2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02081.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0567-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410X.2003.04054.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","volume-title":"Textbook of Female Urology and Urogynaecology","author":"Cardozo L","year":"2006"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(98)00629-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2005.04.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","first-page":"491","article-title":"\u2018BPH\u2019 study group. The ICS \u2018BPH\u2019 study: Pressure\u2010flow studies, quality control and initial analysis","volume":"13","author":"Schafer W","year":"1994","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","unstructured":"LewisP HowellS ShepherdA et al.Urodynamic interpretation guidance not guesswork. (Abstract) 28th Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society. Jerusalem 1998."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.10066"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(06)00343-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.10052"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20325"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20240"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","first-page":"909","article-title":"Role of urodynamics in clinical practice","volume":"73","author":"Torrens M","year":"1980","journal-title":"Z Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000227778.77189.2d"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00067-4"}],"container-title":["Neurourology and Urodynamics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fnau.20679","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fnau.20679","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/nau.20679","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,20]],"date-time":"2023-11-20T23:39:48Z","timestamp":1700523588000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/nau.20679"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,17]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/nau.20679"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.20679","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0733-2467","1520-6777"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0733-2467","type":"print"},{"value":"1520-6777","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,17]]}}}