{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T07:47:42Z","timestamp":1773215262665,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,4,8]],"date-time":"2010-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1270684800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Neurourology and Urodynamics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>Measurement of bladder wall thickness using transvaginal ultrasound has previously been shown to discriminate between women with diagnosed detrusor overactivity and those with urodynamic stress incontinence. So far, no comparison has been made between abdominal, perineal and vaginal route for the measurement of bladder wall thickness. The aim of this prospective study was to determine if abdominal, perineal and vaginal ultrasound measurements of bladder wall thickness are comparable with each other.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>125 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms were asked to participate in the study. All patients had measurements at the trigone, the bladder dome and the anterior bladder wall. The order of either the abdominal, perineal or vaginal approach was computer\u2010assisted randomly assigned. Ultrasound was performed using the Aloka SSD\u20101400 (Aloka\u00ae Co Ltd, Japan) with the vaginal 5 Mhz probe UST\u2010984\u20105 and the abdominal and perineal probe was a 3.5Mhz curved array for SSd\u20101400. Ultrasound examination was made with the patient in supine position with a residual of less than 50ml.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Means of bladder wall thickness are significantly different (p&lt;0.05). Vaginal measurement of bladder wall thickness showed the smallest values for bladder wall thickness, abdominal the largest. At the trigone, differences were significant between vaginal and perineal ultrasound but not between abdominal and perineal approach.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Bladder wall thickness measurements do differ depending on the vaginal, perineal or abdominal approach. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:1393\u20131396, 2010. \u00a9 2010 Wiley\u2010Liss, Inc.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20876","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,4,8]],"date-time":"2010-04-08T14:59:33Z","timestamp":1270738773000},"page":"1393-1396","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["How should bladder wall thickness be measured? A comparison of vaginal, perineal and abdominal ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Annette","family":"Kuhn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sybille","family":"Bank","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dudley","family":"Robinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miriam","family":"Klimek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Kuhn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luigi","family":"Raio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,4,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04443.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1970.tb06796.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","first-page":"CD003195","article-title":"Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults","volume":"3","author":"Glazener CM","year":"2002","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13224.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01021.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.10052"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04030220.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410X.1998.00537.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-009-0392-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","unstructured":"MartanA MasataJ HalaskaM et al.Ultrasonic imaging of the lower urinary tract in women with urinary stress incontinence and in women after the Burch colpopexy Caska Gynekol.1998;63:363\u20136."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1989.tb06039.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","first-page":"4","volume-title":"Textbook of echocardiography and doppler in adults and children","author":"Sutton M","year":"1996"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.07060429.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181998eef"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radonc.2008.08.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09910.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","first-page":"931","article-title":"Does urodynamic verification of overactive bladder determine treatment success?","volume":"103","author":"Malone\u2010Lee J","year":"2009","journal-title":"Results from a randomized placebo\u2010controlled study BJUI"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.10099"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00067-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0302-2838(02)00494-3"}],"container-title":["Neurourology and Urodynamics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fnau.20876","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/nau.20876","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,9]],"date-time":"2023-10-09T13:48:10Z","timestamp":1696859290000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/nau.20876"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,4,8]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/nau.20876"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.20876","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0733-2467","1520-6777"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0733-2467","type":"print"},{"value":"1520-6777","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,4,8]]}}}