{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,3]],"date-time":"2024-09-03T18:24:07Z","timestamp":1725387847677},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,11,21]],"date-time":"2005-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1132531200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5226,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Prenatal Diagnosis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 2931 women randomized to either transabdominal CVS, transceirvical CVS, or amniocentesis were studied. Unless intended or unintended abortion had occurred, they had completed up to 28 weeks of pregnancy. No significant difference was seen between total fetal loss in the transabdominal CVS group and the amniocentesis group (6.5 and 6.8 per cent, respectively, SE difference = 0.92 per cent, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.01). The total fetal loss in the transcervical CVS group was 10.1 per cent. After pooling our data with data from the Canadian randomized study and the American non\u2010randomized study, the difference in risk between trans\u2010cervical CVS and amniocentesis was 1.8 per cent (SE difference = 0.64 per cent, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.8). When the number of failed procedures and those cases evaluated as infeasible for the assigned method\u2010for anatomical reasons\u2010are compared, the overall sampling efficacy is poorer transcervically than transabdominally.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970110808","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,3,4]],"date-time":"2007-03-04T05:40:20Z","timestamp":1172986820000},"page":"529-537","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Comparison of transabdominal and transcervical CVS and amniocentesis: Sampling success and risk"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Steen","family":"Smidt\u2010Jensen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Philip","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,11,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1970.tb00407.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","first-page":"392","volume-title":"The Fetoplacental Unit","author":"Aladjem S.","year":"1969"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","first-page":"38","article-title":"Diagnosis of hydatidiform mole by transabdominal placental biopsy","volume":"96","author":"Alvarez H.","year":"1966","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","first-page":"138","volume-title":"Towards the Prevention of Fetal Malformations","author":"Bartsch F. K.","year":"1978"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90288-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","first-page":"623","article-title":"Rh isoimmunisation during pregnancy: antenatal prophylaxis","volume":"118","author":"Bowman J. M.","year":"1978","journal-title":"Can. Med. Assoc. J."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Multicentric trial comparing chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in prenatal diagnosis","volume":"1","author":"Canadian Collaborative CVS\u2010Amniocentesis Trial Group","year":"1989","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-0004.1974.tb02090.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","first-page":"557","article-title":"Rh\u2010immunoglobulin after amniocentesis for genetic diagnosis","volume":"48","author":"Henry G.","year":"1976","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970050605"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347309157092"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","first-page":"5064","article-title":"McMaster Conference on Prevention of Rh Isoimmunization","volume":"35","year":"1979","journal-title":"Vox Sang."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198903093201001"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00274761"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","first-page":"130","volume-title":"First Trimester Fetal Diagnosis","author":"Simoni G.","year":"1985"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970040302"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970090503"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.293.6546.533"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970070508"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.286.6377.1542"}],"container-title":["Prenatal Diagnosis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpd.1970110808","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pd.1970110808","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,13]],"date-time":"2023-09-13T06:29:58Z","timestamp":1694586598000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pd.1970110808"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1991,8]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pd.1970110808"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.1970110808","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0197-3851","1097-0223"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0197-3851","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-0223","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1991,8]]}}}