{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T05:23:51Z","timestamp":1766467431507},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,17]],"date-time":"2012-04-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1334620800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Prenatal Diagnosis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To define normal growth of the fetal maxillary dental arch using magnetic resonance imaging.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>Four hundred twenty\u2010four consecutive fetuses (18 to 37\u2009weeks) with a morphologically normal anatomy or only minor malformations, not affecting bone growth and face anatomy were included. On axial T2\u2010weighted images the dental arch length and width were measured. The measurements were correlated with gestational age and the biparietal diameter (BPD) of the fetal head using correlation and regression analysis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A linear growth relationship was observed between the dental arch length and gestational age (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.86; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009&lt;0.0001; <jats:italic>y<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009\u22121.85\u2009+\u20090.75 \u00d7 gestational age) and the dental arch width and gestational age (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.92; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009&lt;0.0001; <jats:italic>y<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009\u22122.19\u2009+\u20091.05 \u00d7 gestational age). A significant correlation was found between the dental arch length and the BPD (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.903; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009&lt;0.0001) and the dental arch width and the BPD (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.927; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009&lt;0.0001). The interobserver variability showed good agreement for the dental arch length (intraclass coefficient 0.981; <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.963) and width (intraclass coefficient 0.987; <jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.974), respectively.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>We present a nomogram for the <jats:italic>in utero<\/jats:italic> assessment of the fetal dental arch. These data may help in the early detection of abnormal dental arch development. \u00a9 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3851","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,18]],"date-time":"2012-04-18T03:53:55Z","timestamp":1334721235000},"page":"530-535","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Maxillary dental arch biometry: assessment with fetal MR imaging"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Mariella","family":"Mailath\u2010Pokorny","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katharina","family":"Klein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christof","family":"Worda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiodiagnostics Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peter C.","family":"Brugger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Czerny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiodiagnostics Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ursula","family":"Nemec","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiodiagnostics Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniela","family":"Prayer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiodiagnostics Medical University of Vienna  Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2005.24.9.1229"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","unstructured":"Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man.National Center for Biotechnology Information National Library of Medicine:Bethesda MD.http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/omim.html[accessed on 12 November 2011]."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.30393"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0722.2011.00811.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/040510-189.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/111709-650.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1077"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2008.06.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","first-page":"307","volume-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gyncology","author":"Babcook CJ","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1597\/07-078.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3866"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00622.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1999.14050333.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(85)90107-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","first-page":"647","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy","volume":"104","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Prenatal Diagnosis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpd.3851","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pd.3851","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T14:29:17Z","timestamp":1695479357000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pd.3851"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,17]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pd.3851"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.3851","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0197-3851","1097-0223"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0197-3851","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-0223","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,17]]}}}