{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T00:54:38Z","timestamp":1792716878799,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,26]],"date-time":"2008-11-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1227657600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psycho-Oncology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Objectives<\/jats:italic>: Although rates for first\u2010time and recent mammography screening have increased for women in the US in the past decade, rates for repeat mammography remain low. This study aimed to conduct an analysis of women's mammography experience, to examine the rates of repeat mammography and to identify the significant predictors of repeat mammography within 12 and 18 months of the index mammogram.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>: Participants were 397 women obtaining a screening mammogram (i.e. index) at three university\u2010affiliated radiology clinics. Following the index mammogram, women completed the measures assessing demographic background, health history, breast cancer knowledge, risk, and screening history, and aspects of the mammography experience. Eighteen months following the index mammogram, 296 women were contacted via telephone to assess repeat mammography behavior.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>: Factor analysis of a mammography experience survey yielded four major components including satisfaction with clinic services, physical experience, psychological experience, and communication with clinic staff. Twelve\u2010month and 18\u2010month repeat mammography rates were 37 and 68%, respectively. Logistic regression models found lifetime number of mammograms to predict repeat mammography at 12 and 18 months. In addition, the number of clinical breast exams obtained in the past 5 years predicted repeat mammography at 12 months, while having scheduled a mammography appointment predicted repeat mammography at 18 months.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Conclusions<\/jats:italic>: Based on these findings, strategies to increase mammography adherence include implementing a formal reminder system that prompts patients (e.g. postcard, automated telephone call) to schedule an annual mammogram or training clinic staff to automatically schedule an annual mammogram at the time of the current screening appointment. Copyright \u00a9 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.1463","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,26]],"date-time":"2008-11-26T17:10:38Z","timestamp":1227719438000},"page":"727-734","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Tricia S.","family":"Tang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephanie K.","family":"Patterson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marilyn A.","family":"Roubidoux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Linping","family":"Duan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3322\/canjclin.57.1.43"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","unstructured":"Michigan Public Health Institute (in support of the Michigan Cancer Consortium Initiative). The Cancer Burden in Michigan: Selected Statistics. Okemos MI December 2006. Available at:www.michigancancer.org\/PDFs\/MCCReports\/CancerBurden\u2010Dec2006\/CancerBurdenInMichigan\u2010Dec06\u2010AllSections.pdf. Accessed on: November 20 2007."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.10765"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)13143-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-8049(01)00397-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3322\/canjclin.53.3.141"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/93.22.1704"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","unstructured":"National Center for Health Statistics: Health United States 2002: With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Government Printing Office: Washington DC 017\u2010022\u201001531 2002."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Trends in self\u2010reported use of mammograms (1989\u20131997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991\u20131997)\u2014behavioral risk factor surveillance system","volume":"48","author":"Blackman DK","year":"1999","journal-title":"MMWR"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2004.05.020"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.620.13.4","article-title":"On\u2010schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program","volume":"13","author":"Bobo JK","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2003.09.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/pmed.2001.0942"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/S15324796ABM2603_05"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","first-page":"29","article-title":"Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines","volume":"33","author":"Phillips KA","year":"1998","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_2","first-page":"595","article-title":"Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older","volume":"8","author":"Yood MU","year":"1999","journal-title":"Cancer Epidmiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2096","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.2096.13.12","article-title":"A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White Women Ages 40\u201379","volume":"13","author":"Calvocoressi L","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1497.2005.00312.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_2","first-page":"180","article-title":"Once is enough\u2014why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme","volume":"111","author":"Elwood M","year":"1998","journal-title":"N Z Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jms.8.4.204"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3959(97)00114-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(94)90163-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(96)03057-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042939","article-title":"A comparative study of re\u2010attenders and non\u2010re\u2010attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments","volume":"16","author":"Marshall G","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Public Health Med (Oxf)"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_2","first-page":"320","article-title":"Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a seond breast cancer screening examination","volume":"41","author":"Orton M","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10552-005-0447-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlr.0000135832.28672.61"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199707000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/13.1.67"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2003.12.032"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/pmed.2000.0718"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(03)00215-0"}],"container-title":["Psycho-Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpon.1463","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fpon.1463","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/pon.1463","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,14]],"date-time":"2023-11-14T17:22:19Z","timestamp":1699982539000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/pon.1463"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,26]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/pon.1463"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pon.1463","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1057-9249","1099-1611"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1057-9249","type":"print"},{"value":"1099-1611","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,26]]}}}