{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T07:09:00Z","timestamp":1780556940071,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,30]],"date-time":"2011-03-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1301443200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Pest Management Science"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Residue trial data reported by the Joint FAO\/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) have been reviewed to establish whether or not the resulting residues in harvested commodities are proportional to the pesticide application rate used on the crop. Numerous sets of trials were identified where the only parameter varied was application rate or spray concentration. Analysis of this database in terms of application rate, spray concentration, formulation type, preharvest interval, crop, pesticide, residue level and application type confirms that residues scale with application rate (proportionality principle). It is anticipated that use of the proportionality principle by regulators and those interested in evaluating pesticide residue data will improve pesticide risk assessment. Copyright \u00a9 2011 Society of Chemical Industry<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1002\/ps.2158","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,30]],"date-time":"2011-03-30T06:54:40Z","timestamp":1301468080000},"page":"609-615","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["A review of the effect of different application rates on pesticide residue levels in supervised residue trials"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"67","author":[{"given":"Dugald J","family":"MacLachlan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Denis","family":"Hamilton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","volume-title":"Submission and Evaluation of Pesticide Residue Data for the Estimation of Maximum Residue Levels in Food and Feed."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","unstructured":"OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Crop Field Trial.[Online]. OECD 509 (2009). Available:http:\/\/oberon.sourceoecd.org\/vl = 8367940\/cl = 35\/nw = 1\/rpsv\/ij\/oecdjournals\/1607310x\/v1n7\/s10\/p1[4 May 2010]."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","unstructured":"Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines OPPTS 860.1500. Crop Field Trials.[Online]. EPA 712\u2010C\u201096\u2010183 (1996). Available:http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/ocspp\/pubs\/frs\/publications\/Test_Guidelines\/series860.htm[4 May 2010]."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/026520300412410"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1021\/jf020265s"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1368","DOI":"10.1093\/jaoac\/87.6.1368","article-title":"Contribution of sampling to the variability of pesticide residue data","volume":"87","author":"Ambrus A","year":"2004","journal-title":"J AOAC Int"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","unstructured":"KochHandWeisserP Quantitative aspects of spray fluid retention.Proc IUPAC 3\u20137 August 1998 2D 024 London UK (1998)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","unstructured":"Pesticide residues in food. Evaluations 1992. Part I\u2014Residues. Abamectin 1\u201392. FAO plant production and protection paper 118 Rome Italy (1992)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","unstructured":"BanasiakU HohgardtK KoineckeA PlassRandMollE Extrapolation of residue data\u2014based on the RUEDIS Information System. Abstract IUPAC International Congress on Pesticide Chemistry August 1998 London UK (1998)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","unstructured":"VillanuevaPandHamiltonDJ Is the resulting residue proportional to pesticide application rate?Abstract IUPAC International Congress on Pesticide Chemistry August 2006 Kobe Japan (2006)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","first-page":"9","volume-title":"Environmental Quality. Vol. 1.","author":"Hoerger FD","year":"1972"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1897\/03-656.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/etc.5620150419"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","unstructured":"Pesticide residues in food 2009. Joint FAO\/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues FAO plant production and protection paper 196 Rome Italy (2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","unstructured":"Pesticide residues in food 2009. Evaluations. Part I\u2014Residues. Joint FAO\/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues FAO plant production and protection paper 198 Rome Italy (2010)."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ps.1608"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HollandPT MalcolmCP MowatAD RohithaBHandGaskinRE Modelling of pesticide residues on fruit II: persimmon.Proc 49th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference 13\u201315 August 1996 Nelson New Zealand pp.192\u2013197(1996).","DOI":"10.30843\/nzpp.1996.49.11418"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19440040903403024"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1093\/jaoac\/83.1.214","article-title":"Quantitative relationship of application rate and pesticide residues in greenhouse tomatoes","volume":"83","author":"Sad\u0142o S","year":"2000","journal-title":"J AOAC Int"}],"container-title":["Pest Management Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fps.2158","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ps.2158","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T18:06:06Z","timestamp":1761069966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ps.2158"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,30]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ps.2158"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ps.2158","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1526-498X","1526-4998"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1526-498X","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-4998","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2010-06-02","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2011-02-02","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2011-03-30","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}