{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T20:08:26Z","timestamp":1761163706324,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,15]],"date-time":"2014-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1405382400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Pest Management Science"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>BACKGROUND<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Toxic fly baits are commonly used for fly control in California animal operations. However, resistance development has been a problem. Comprehensive laboratory and field studies were conducted to test commercial baits (imidacloprid, methomyl, dinotefuran, spinosad) and one novel cyantraniliprole bait. A susceptible\n                      <jats:italic>Musca domestica<\/jats:italic>\n                      strain was compared with wild\u2010type\n                      <jats:italic>M. domestica<\/jats:italic>\n                      and\n                      <jats:italic>Fannia canicularis<\/jats:italic>\n                      strains in the laboratory using choice\/no\u2010choice tests. Field visitation to baits and both short\u2010 and longer\u2010term mortality were documented.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Susceptible\n                      <jats:italic>Musca<\/jats:italic>\n                      suffered high mortality with all baits after 3 days of choice and no\u2010choice tests. Wild\u2010type\n                      <jats:italic>Musca<\/jats:italic>\n                      mortality was more variable and higher in no\u2010choice relative to choice tests.\n                      <jats:italic>Fannia<\/jats:italic>\n                      were most susceptible to spinosad\u2009&gt;\u2009dinotefuran\u2009=\u2009cyantraniliprole\u2009&gt;\u2009methomyl\u2009=\u2009imidacloprid. Field\n                      <jats:italic>Musca<\/jats:italic>\n                      were most attracted to spinosad\u2009&gt;\u2009cyantraniliprole\u2009&gt;\u2009dinotefuran\u2009&gt;\u2009sugar\u2009&gt;\u2009methomyl\u2009&gt;\u2009imidacloprid. Delayed mortality from bait\u2010fed field flies (captured and held with untreated food and water for 3 days) was ranked spinosad\u2009=\u2009cyantraniliprole\u2009&gt;\u2009dinotefuran\u2009=\u2009methomyl\u2009&gt;\u2009imidacloprid\u2009&gt;\u2009sugar.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSION<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Behavioral resistance of\n                      <jats:italic>M. domestica<\/jats:italic>\n                      to imidacloprid and methomyl persists. Spinosad and cyantraniliprole baits (delayed mortality) performed best. Speed of action may be a factor in use and misuse of baits. \u00a9 2014 Society of Chemical Industry\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/ps.3847","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,28]],"date-time":"2014-06-28T08:34:46Z","timestamp":1403944486000},"page":"752-758","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Laboratory and field assessment of cyantraniliprole relative to existing fly baits"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"71","author":[{"given":"Amy C","family":"Murillo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Entomology University of California  Riverside CA USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alec C","family":"Gerry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Entomology University of California  Riverside CA USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nicola T","family":"Gallagher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Syngenta, LLC  Greensboro NC USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nyles G","family":"Peterson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California Cooperative Extension  San Bernardino CA USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bradley A","family":"Mullens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Entomology University of California  Riverside CA USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jee\/7.3.268"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.en.35.010190.000533"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ps.885"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1286-4579(01)01371-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bmcl.2013.09.076"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","first-page":"195","article-title":"Monitoring susceptibility of house flies (Musca domestica L.) in the United States to imidacloprid","volume":"23","author":"Kaufman PE","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Agric Urban Entomol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1603\/0022-0493(2007)100[1489:HFDMAN]2.0.CO;2","article-title":"House fly (Diptera: Muscidae) activity near baits containing (Z)\u20109\u2010tricosene and efficacy of commercial toxic fly baits on a southern California dairy","volume":"100","author":"Butler SM","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Econ Entomol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ps.1481"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","article-title":"Behavioral resistance of house flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to imidacloprid","author":"Gerry AC","year":"2009","journal-title":"US Army Med Dep J"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pestbp.2013.10.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2915.1989.tb00471.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","first-page":"7","article-title":"Review of the global status and recent development of insecticide resistance in field populations of the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)","volume":"89","author":"Keiding J","year":"1999","journal-title":"Bull Entomol Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1526-4998(200002)56:2<147::AID-PS106>3.0.CO;2-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1603\/0022-0493-95.6.1245"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1603\/0022-0493(2007)100[155:KAMCAS]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ee\/2.4.555"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1242\/jeb.005033"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1603\/0022-0493(2004)097[1042:SOSIMD]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jee\/60.5.1338"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00989502"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ee\/4.3.395"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1603\/EC09293"}],"container-title":["Pest Management Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fps.3847","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/ps.3847","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T17:35:52Z","timestamp":1761068152000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/ps.3847"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,15]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/ps.3847"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ps.3847","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1526-498X","1526-4998"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1526-498X"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1526-4998"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-03-21","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-06-18","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-07-15","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}