{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T20:22:03Z","timestamp":1790713323238,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":674,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12467","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,26]],"date-time":"2013-03-26T12:56:46Z","timestamp":1364302606000},"page":"500-508","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":74,"title":["Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"C. J. M.","family":"Verhoeven","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; M\u00e1xima Medical Center; Veldhoven The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B. C.","family":"Opmeer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical Research Unit; Academic Medical Centre; Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S. G.","family":"Oei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; M\u00e1xima Medical Center; Veldhoven The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V.","family":"Latour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Reinier de Graaf Groep; Delft The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J. A. M.","family":"van der Post","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B. W. J.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; M\u00e1xima Medical Center; Veldhoven The Netherlands"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0001|uog12467-cit-0001","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2002","volume":"52","author":"Martin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0002|uog12467-cit-0002","volume-title":"Induction of labour. NICE Clinical Guideline 70","author":"National Institute for Healthcare and Clinical Excellence","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0003|uog12467-cit-0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0004|uog12467-cit-0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017","article-title":"Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands","volume":"132","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"331","key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0005|uog12467-cit-0005","article-title":"Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world","volume":"206","author":"Gibbons","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0006|uog12467-cit-0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004945.pub2","article-title":"Induction of labor for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"4","author":"G\u00fclmezoglu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0007|uog12467-cit-0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005302.pub2","article-title":"Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabor rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more)","volume":"1","author":"Dare","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0008|uog12467-cit-0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label\u2009randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0009|uog12467-cit-0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0010|uog12467-cit-0010","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0011|uog12467-cit-0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1331024","article-title":"The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review","author":"Kolkman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0012|uog12467-cit-0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90040-X","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor","volume":"171","author":"Boozarjomehri","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0013|uog12467-cit-0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0014|uog12467-cit-0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00143-4","article-title":"Assessment of the cervix in the third trimester of pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound scanning","volume":"105","author":"Lazanakis","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0015|uog12467-cit-0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00765.x","article-title":"Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy","volume":"20","author":"Valentin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0016|uog12467-cit-0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00854.x","article-title":"Measuring cervical length with ultrasound: evaluation of the procedures and duration of a learning method","volume":"20","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0017|uog12467-cit-0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N","article-title":"Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound","volume":"40","author":"Paterson-Brown","year":"1991","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0018|uog12467-cit-0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x","article-title":"Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"18","author":"Pandis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0019|uog12467-cit-0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x","article-title":"Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction","volume":"19","author":"Gabriel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0020|uog12467-cit-0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01386-2","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"98","author":"Chandra","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0021|uog12467-cit-0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay","volume":"189","author":"Reis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0022|uog12467-cit-0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x","article-title":"Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score","volume":"112","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0023|uog12467-cit-0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-3-25","article-title":"The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews","volume":"3","author":"Whiting","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0024|uog12467-cit-0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022","article-title":"Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews","volume":"58","author":"Reitsma","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0025|uog12467-cit-0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/kxl004","article-title":"A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"8","author":"Harbord","year":"2007","journal-title":"Biostatistics"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0026|uog12467-cit-0026","first-page":"277","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of labor","volume":"3","author":"Bastani","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Women's Health"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0027|uog12467-cit-0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00881.x","article-title":"Variables that predict the success of labor induction","volume":"84","author":"Bueno","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0028|uog12467-cit-0028","first-page":"184","article-title":"Does cervical length measurement help to predict the success rate of labor induction using misoprostol at term in women with strictly unfavorable cervix?","volume":"7","author":"Caliskan","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0029|uog12467-cit-0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1406","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003678135","article-title":"Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix","volume":"23","author":"Cheung","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0030|uog12467-cit-0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.049","article-title":"Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix","volume":"196","author":"Cromi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0031|uog12467-cit-0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1159\/000089045","article-title":"Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women","volume":"21","author":"Daskalakis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0032|uog12467-cit-0032","first-page":"106","article-title":"Etude du col de l'ut\u00e9rus par \u00e9chographie endovaginale avant maturation cervicale par gel de prostaglandine","volume":"93","author":"Dewandeleer","year":"1998","journal-title":"Rev Fr Gyn\u00e9col Obst\u00e9t"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0033|uog12467-cit-0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5360","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor","volume":"32","author":"Eggebo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0034|uog12467-cit-0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600594922","article-title":"A way to lend objectivity to Bishop score","volume":"26","author":"Elghorori","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0035|uog12467-cit-0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1016\/S1297-9589(01)00244-2","article-title":"Echographie endocervicale du col ut\u00e9rin avant d\u00e9clenchement artificiel du travail","volume":"29","author":"Gabriel","year":"2001","journal-title":"Gyn\u00e9col Obst\u00e9t Fertil"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0036|uog12467-cit-0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score","volume":"7","author":"Gonen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0037|uog12467-cit-0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00762.x","article-title":"Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women","volume":"47","author":"Keepanasseril","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0038|uog12467-cit-0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701409858","article-title":"Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"86","author":"G\u00f3mez Laencina","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0039|uog12467-cit-0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6219","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term","volume":"33","author":"Meijer-Hoogeveen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0040|uog12467-cit-0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.21608\/ejhm.2000.11014","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment as a predictor of successful labor induction","volume":"1","author":"Mohamed","year":"2000","journal-title":"Egypt J Hosp Med"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0041|uog12467-cit-0041","first-page":"569","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonography of uterine cervix in prediction of the outcome of labour induction","volume":"53","author":"Novakov-Miki\u0107","year":"2000","journal-title":"Med Pregl"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0042|uog12467-cit-0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00595.x","article-title":"Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE1) and dinoprostone gel (PGE2) for induction of labor at term","volume":"18","author":"Pandis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0043|uog12467-cit-0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2007.22.4.722","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women","volume":"22","author":"Park","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0044|uog12467-cit-0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.166","article-title":"Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section","volume":"22","author":"Rane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0045|uog12467-cit-0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1008","article-title":"Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?","volume":"23","author":"Roman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0046|uog12467-cit-0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery","volume":"29","author":"Tan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0047|uog12467-cit-0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.014","article-title":"Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction","volume":"100","author":"Tanir","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0048|uog12467-cit-0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7315","article-title":"Validation of models that predict Cesarean section after induction of labor","volume":"34","author":"Verhoeven","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0049|uog12467-cit-0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction","volume":"182","author":"Ware","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0050|uog12467-cit-0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.3.375","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor","volume":"23","author":"Yang","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0051|uog12467-cit-0051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02849968","article-title":"Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction","volume":"24","author":"Yanik","year":"2007","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0052|uog12467-cit-0052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.050","article-title":"Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"197","author":"Hatfield","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1002\/uog.12467-BIB0053|uog12467-cit-0053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03405.x","article-title":"Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial","volume":"119","author":"Tajik","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fuog.12467","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/uog.12467","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,12]],"date-time":"2022-02-12T12:00:14Z","timestamp":1644667214000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.12467"}},"subtitle":["Cervical length in induction of labor"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,27]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12467","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,27]]}}}