{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,8]],"date-time":"2025-12-08T21:56:45Z","timestamp":1765231005549},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]],"date-time":"2014-02-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1392163200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstet &amp;amp; Gyne"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>To compare the performance of traditional growth charts for estimated fetal weight (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EFW<\/jats:styled-content>) and a validated pragmatic probabilistic approach using biometry at 31\u201334\u2009weeks' gestation to screen for late pregnancy small\u2010for\u2010gestational age (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content>) fetuses in a low\u2010risk population<\/jats:italic>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Records of ultrasound biometry at 31\u201334\u2009weeks were reviewed in 7755 consecutive low\u2010risk women between 2002 and 2011. Fetal malformations, Doppler anomalies and preterm delivery before 37\u2009weeks were excluded. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> was defined by various percentile cut\u2010offs of birth weight. The probability of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> was modeled as a function of<\/jats:italic> Z\u2010<jats:italic>scores of femur length, abdominal circumference and head circumference. The model was validated on a second independent dataset of 1725 pregnancies from a different screening unit. The screening performance of this probabilistic approach was compared with those of traditional <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EFW<\/jats:styled-content> growth charts. The additional value of factoring in maternal characteristics was also ascertained<\/jats:italic>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Using national birth\u2010weight charts, the proportions of newborns at 37\u201342\u2009weeks with birth weight\u2009&lt;\u20093<jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup>, &lt;\u20095<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> and\u2009&lt;\u200910<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> centiles were 3%, 6% and 12%, respectively, and there was a 2% rate of birth weight\u2009&lt;\u20092500\u2009g. For a 10% false\u2010positive rate, a direct probabilistic approach yielded a 51% detection rate of neonates with birth weight\u2009&lt;\u200910<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> centile, compared to the 32% and 48% detection rates given by the 10<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> centile cut\u2010off of two reference charts for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EFW<\/jats:styled-content>. Adding maternal characteristics significantly improved detection rate by 2% to 53%<\/jats:italic>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>The suggested validated approach to screening for late <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> fetuses outperforms traditional approaches using growth charts. By adding maternal characteristics, this screening method offers a favorable alternative to customized charts. Copyright \u00a9 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd<\/jats:italic><\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13288","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,19]],"date-time":"2013-12-19T16:46:41Z","timestamp":1387471601000},"page":"311-316","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Optimal risk assessment of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age fetuses using 31\u201334\u2010week biometry in a low\u2010risk population"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"J. J.","family":"Stirnemann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine GHU Necker\u2010Enfants Malades, AP\u2010HP, Universit\u00e9 Paris Descartes France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Benoist","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine GHU Necker\u2010Enfants Malades, AP\u2010HP, Universit\u00e9 Paris Descartes France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L. J.","family":"Salomon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine GHU Necker\u2010Enfants Malades, AP\u2010HP, Universit\u00e9 Paris Descartes France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.\u2010P.","family":"Bernard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine GHU Necker\u2010Enfants Malades, AP\u2010HP, Universit\u00e9 Paris Descartes France"},{"name":"Centre Europ\u00e9en de Diagnostic et d'Exploration de la Femme (CEDEF) Maurepas France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Y.","family":"Ville","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine GHU Necker\u2010Enfants Malades, AP\u2010HP, Universit\u00e9 Paris Descartes France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.036"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00387-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00602.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200310000-00008"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7583"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.027"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13078.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13077.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4019"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600569133"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(87)90031-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70188-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60364-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwq411"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02371.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00285-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199712000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_1","article-title":"Individually customised fetal weight charts derived from ultrasound measurements: the Generation R Study","author":"Gaillard R","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2598"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11020110.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.1870200604"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819930b0","volume":"113","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01528-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_29_1","unstructured":"rapportCTE.pdf (Objet application\/pdf) [Internet]. [cited 2010 Oct 17]. Available from:http:\/\/www.cfef.org\/archives\/lettres\/DocusCTE\/rapportCTE.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2009.01674.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X0002000401"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-2564"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.069"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2231010876"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12550.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00708.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2733"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70494-7"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fuog.13288","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.13288","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T18:50:43Z","timestamp":1696531843000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.13288"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/uog.13288"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.13288","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692","1469-0705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-0705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-08-05","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-12-12","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-02-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}