{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T07:21:31Z","timestamp":1790493691478,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,10]],"date-time":"2015-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1425945600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"name":"European Commission FP7","award":["601852"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["601852"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003123","name":"The Fetal Medicine Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003123","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstet &amp; Gyne"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the value of fetal biometry at 30\u201334 weeks' gestation in the prediction of delivery of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content>) neonates, in the absence of pre\u2010eclampsia (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PE<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This was a screening study in 30 849 singleton pregnancies at 30\u201334 weeks' gestation, comprising 1727 that delivered <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> neonates with a birth weight &lt; 5<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> percentile and 29 122 cases unaffected by <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content>, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PE<\/jats:styled-content> or gestational hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if screening by a combination of maternal factors and <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\u2010scores of fetal head circumference (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HC<\/jats:styled-content>), abdominal circumference (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">AC<\/jats:styled-content>) and femur length (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FL<\/jats:styled-content>) or estimated fetal weight (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EFW<\/jats:styled-content>) had a significant contribution to the prediction of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> neonates.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Combined screening by maternal characteristics and obstetric history, with <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\u2010scores of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EFW<\/jats:styled-content> at 30\u201334 weeks, predicted 79%, 87% and 92% of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> neonates that delivered &lt; 5 weeks following assessment, with a birth weight &lt; 10<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>, &lt; 5<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> and &lt; 3<jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup> percentiles, respectively, at a 10% false\u2010positive rate. The respective detection rates for the prediction of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> neonates delivering \u2265 5 weeks from the time of assessment were 53%, 58% and 61%. The performance of screening by a combination of <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\u2010scores of fetal <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HC<\/jats:styled-content>, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">AC<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FL<\/jats:styled-content> was similar to that achieved by the EFW <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\u2010score alone.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Combined testing by maternal characteristics and fetal biometry at 30\u201334 weeks could identify a high proportion of pregnancies that will deliver <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SGA<\/jats:styled-content> neonates. Copyright \u00a9 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14771","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,19]],"date-time":"2014-12-19T11:57:49Z","timestamp":1418990269000},"page":"551-558","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["Prediction of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30\u201334 weeks"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"S.","family":"Bakalis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine King's College Hospital  London UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine King's College Hospital  London UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Akolekar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine King's College Hospital  London UK"},{"name":"Department of Fetal Medicine Medway Maritime Hospital  Gillingham, Kent UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L. C.","family":"Poon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine King's College Hospital  London UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K. H.","family":"Nicolaides","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine King's College Hospital  London UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1991.10.3.153"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70347-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.057"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.10.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10078"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4161"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90134-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000338655"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/10641950109152635"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16237.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000324320"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000321694"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000341264"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000336662"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fuog.14771","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.14771","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T15:03:50Z","timestamp":1696518230000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.14771"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,10]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/uog.14771"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14771","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692","1469-0705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-0705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-11-11","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2014-12-15","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2015-03-10","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}