{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T13:27:22Z","timestamp":1788355642706,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,6]],"date-time":"2017-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1488758400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000024","name":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["CRI 88413"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CRI 88413"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000024","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstet &amp; Gyne"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare third\u2010trimester ultrasound screening methods to predict small\u2010for\u2010gestational age (SGA), and to evaluate the impact of the ultrasound\u2013delivery interval on screening performance.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this prospective study, data were collected from a multicenter singleton cohort study investigating the links between various exposures during pregnancy with birth outcome and later health  in children. We included women, recruited in the first trimester, who had complete outcome data and had undergone third\u2010trimester ultrasound examination. Demographic, clinical and biological variables were also collected from both parents. We compared prediction of delivery of a SGA neonate (birth weight &lt; 10<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> percentile) by the following methods: abdominal circumference (AC) <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\u2010score based on Hadlock curves (Hadlock AC), on INTERGROWTH\u201021<jats:sup>st<\/jats:sup> Project curves (Intergrowth AC) and on Salomon curves (Salomon AC); estimated fetal weight (EFW) <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\u2010score based on Hadlock curves (Hadlock EFW) and on customized curves from Gardosi (Gardosi EFW); and fetal growth velocity based on change in AC between second and third trimesters  (FGVAC). We also assessed the following ultrasound\u2013delivery intervals: \u2264 4 weeks, \u2264 6 weeks and \u2264 10 weeks.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Third\u2010trimester ultrasound was performed in 1805 patients with complete outcome data, of whom 158 (8.8%) delivered a SGA neonate. Ultrasound examination was at a median gestational age of 32 (interquartile range, 31\u201333) weeks. The ultrasound\u2013delivery interval was \u2264 4 weeks in 17.2% of cases, \u2264 6 weeks in 48.1% of cases and \u2264 10 weeks in 97.3% of cases. Areas under the receiver\u2013operating characteristics curve (AUC) were 0.772 for Salomon AC, 0.768 for Hadlock EFW, 0.766 for Hadlock AC, 0.765 for Intergrowth AC, 0.708 for Gardosi EFW and 0.674 for FGVAC (all <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). The screening method with the highest AUC for an ultrasound\u2013delivery interval \u2264 4 weeks was  Salomon AC (AUC, 0.856), \u2264 6 weeks was Hadlock AC (AUC, 0.824) and \u2264 10 weeks was  Salomon AC (AUC, 0.780). At a fixed 10% false\u2010positive rate, the best detection rates were 60.0%, 54.1% and 42.1% for intervals \u2264 4, \u2264 6 and \u2264 10 weeks, respectively.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Third\u2010trimester ultrasound measurements provide poor to moderate prediction of SGA. A shorter ultrasound\u2013delivery interval provides better prediction than does a longer interval. Further studies are needed to test the effect of including maternal or biological characteristics in SGA screening. Copyright \u00a9 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15959","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,6]],"date-time":"2016-05-06T16:31:09Z","timestamp":1462552269000},"page":"372-378","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Prediction of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age neonate by third\u2010trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound\u2013delivery interval"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Q.","family":"Reboul","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Saint\u2010Etienne Universit\u00e9 Jean Monnet  Saint\u2010Etienne France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Delabaere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Z. C.","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.\u2010M.","family":"Nuyt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Y.","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Chauleur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Saint\u2010Etienne Universit\u00e9 Jean Monnet  Saint\u2010Etienne France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"W.","family":"Fraser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Audibert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU Sainte\u2010Justine Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al  Montr\u00e9al Qu\u00e9bec Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.86.5.707"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70513-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001451.pub3"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00649.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH\u201021st Project","author":"Papageorghiou AT","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06030168.x"},{"issue":"25","key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","first-page":"e1","article-title":"A customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population","volume":"201","author":"Gardosi J","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2733"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.139.2.367"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14755"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6109"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)91823-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)03122-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4161"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14771"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14915"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14816"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12320"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.108.2.e35"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.4.5883.28"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2010.29.1.157"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15740"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.816"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.995083"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fuog.15959","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fuog.15959","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.15959","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/uog.15959","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.15959","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,13]],"date-time":"2025-05-13T08:32:05Z","timestamp":1747125125000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.15959"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/uog.15959"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.15959","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692","1469-0705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-0705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-01-17","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2016-04-29","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2017-03-06","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}