{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T02:51:37Z","timestamp":1790736697044,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]],"date-time":"2022-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1656633600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstet &amp;amp; Gyne"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To compare, using a unified approach, standardized estimated fetal weight (EFW) trajectories from the second trimester to birth and birth\u2010weight (BW) measurements in\n                      <jats:italic>in\u2010vitro<\/jats:italic>\n                      fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF\/ICSI) pregnancies obtained after frozen\u2013thawed\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      fresh blastocyst transfer (BT).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This was a secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal cohort study performed at the Fetal Medicine and Obstetric Departments of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy, from January 2016 to December 2020. Eligible for inclusion were singleton viable gestations conceived by autologous IVF\/ICSI conception after fresh or frozen\u2013thawed BT that underwent standard fetal biometry assessment at 19\u201341\u2009weeks and had BW measurements available. All ultrasound assessments were performed by operators blinded to the employment of cryopreservation. Patients with twin gestation, significant pregestational disease, miscarriage, major fetal abnormalities and use of other types of medically assisted reproduction techniques were excluded. EFW and BW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores and their trajectories were analyzed using general linear models (GLM) and logistic regression with a unified modeling methodology based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts, adjusting for major confounders. Differences between prenatal EFW and postnatal BW centiles in the two groups were assessed and compared using contingency tables, \u03c7\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      test and conversion of prenatal to postnatal centiles.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 631 IVF\/ICSI pregnancies were considered, comprising 263 conceived following fresh BT and 368 after frozen\u2013thawed BT. A total of 1795 EFW observations were available (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009715 in fresh BT group and\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20091080 in frozen\u2013thawed BT group; median of three observations per patient). EFW and BW &lt;\u200910\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile were significantly more frequent in the fresh than in the frozen\u2013thawed BT group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.003 and\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001, respectively). EFW and BW &gt;\u200990\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile were significantly more frequent in the frozen\u2013thawed\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      fresh BT group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.034 and\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.002, respectively). GLM showed significantly decreasing EFW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores with advancing gestational age (GA) in both groups. The effect of GA was assumed to be equal in the two study groups, as no significant interaction effect was found. Smoothed mean EFW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores from 19\u2009weeks of gestation to term and smoothed mean BW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores were both significantly higher in the frozen\u2013thawed compared with the fresh BT group (EFW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010score, 0.70\u2009\u00b1\u20091.29\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.28\u2009\u00b1\u20091.43;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001; BW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010score, 0.04\u2009\u00b1\u20091.08\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u22120.31\u2009\u00b1\u20091.28;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Mean smoothed EFW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010score values in the frozen\u2013thawed\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      fresh BT groups were 1.01\u2009\u00b1\u20090.12\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      0.60\u2009\u00b1\u20090.08 at 19\u201327\u2009weeks, 0.36\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u22120.06\u2009\u00b1\u20090.04 at 28\u201335\u2009weeks and \u22120.66\u2009\u00b1\u20090.01\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u22120.88\u2009\u00b1\u20090.02 at 36\u201341\u2009weeks. Mean smoothed BW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010score values in the frozen\u2013thawed\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      fresh BT groups were \u22120.80\u2009\u00b1\u20090.14\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u22121.20\u2009\u00b1\u20090.10 at 28\u201335\u2009weeks and 0.22\u2009\u00b1\u20090.16\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u22120.24\u2009\u00b1\u20090.14 at 36\u201341\u2009weeks. Assessment of EFW and BW concordance showed a significantly greater rate of postnatal confirmation of prenatally predicted small\u2010for\u2010gestational age (SGA) &lt;\u200910\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile in the fresh compared with the frozen\u2013thawed BT group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), whereas the rate of postnatal confirmation of large\u2010for\u2010gestational age (LGA) &gt;\u200990\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile was significantly higher in the frozen\u2013thawed\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      the fresh BT group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the smoothed rate of EFW &lt;\u20093\n                      <jats:sup>rd<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile was about 6\u2010fold higher in the fresh\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      frozen\u2013thawed BT group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), whereas the smoothed rates of EFW 90\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u201397\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile and &gt;\u200997\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      centile were nearly double in the frozen\u2013thawed compared with the fresh BT group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05 and\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001, respectively).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Robust novel unified prenatal\u2013postnatal modeling in IVF\/ICSI pregnancies after frozen\u2013thawed or fresh BT from 19\u2009weeks of gestation to birth showed non\u2010divergent growth trajectories, with higher EFW and BW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores in the frozen\u2013thawed\n                      <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      fresh BT group. The mean EFW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores in both IVF\/ICSI groups were greater than those expected for natural conceptions, being highest in the midtrimester and decreasing with advancing gestation in both groups, becoming negative after 32\u2009weeks in the fresh and after 35\u2009weeks in the frozen\u2013thawed BT group. Mean BW\n                      <jats:italic>Z<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2010scores were negative in both groups, with lower values in preterm fetuses, and increased with advancing gestation, becoming positive at term in the frozen\u2013thawed BT group. IVF\/ICSI conceptions from frozen\u2013thawed as compared to fresh BT presented increased rate of LGA and reduced rate of SGA both prenatally and postnatally. \u00a9 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.24806","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,30]],"date-time":"2021-10-30T07:59:20Z","timestamp":1635580760000},"page":"76-85","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Greater estimated fetal weight and birth weight in IVF\/ICSI pregnancy after frozen\u2013thawed\n                    <i>vs<\/i>\n                    fresh blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study with novel unified modeling methodology"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"60","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8097-366X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"P. I.","family":"Cavoretto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6862-1810","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A.","family":"Farina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC) IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero\u2010Universitaria di Bologna  Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Gaeta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Seidenari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC) IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero\u2010Universitaria di Bologna  Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Pozzoni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Spinillo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Morano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sant'Anna University Hospital  Cona, Ferrara Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Alteri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Vigan\u00f2","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Candiani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital  Milan Italy"},{"name":"University Vita\u2010Salute  Milan Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.035"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms018"},{"issue":"368","key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis","volume":"98","author":"Maheshwari A","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det272"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det440"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.10.020"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.049"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa305"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15456"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.06.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21969"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.035"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19073"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2665"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14831"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2021.1050"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa210"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.08.047"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.027"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03009.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew060"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab088"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19066"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-033675"},{"issue":"433","key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Effect of frozen\/thawed embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight rates in US singleton infants","volume":"218","author":"Litzky JF","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.06.039"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu271"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18930"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"IVF\/ICSI treatment and the risk of iatrogenic preterm birth in singleton pregnancies: systematic review and meta\u2010analysis of cohort studies","volume":"4","author":"Cavoretto PI","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1615","key":"e_1_2_8_36_1","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst\u2010stage versus cleavage\u2010stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis","volume":"100","author":"Maheshwari A","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15509"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000338655"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcn\/nqaa051"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des386"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del151"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des036"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq067"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa245"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa235"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.24806","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/uog.24806","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.24806","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,19]],"date-time":"2023-08-19T11:46:15Z","timestamp":1692445575000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.24806"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/uog.24806"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.24806","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692","1469-0705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-0705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-05-31","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-10-20","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-07-01","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}