{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]],"date-time":"2026-08-31T13:36:06Z","timestamp":1788183366032,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,8]],"date-time":"2024-03-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709856000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstet &amp;amp; Gyne"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      \u00a0To compare the performance of two\u2010dimensional ultrasound (2D\u2010US), three\u2010dimensional ultrasound (3D\u2010US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 36\u2009weeks' gestation in predicting the delivery of a large\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age (LGA) neonate, defined as birth weight \u2265\u200995\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      percentile, in patients at high and low risk for macrosomia.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study conducted between January 2017 and February 2019. Women with a singleton pregnancy at 36\u2009weeks' gestation underwent 2D\u2010US, 3D\u2010US and MRI within 15\u2009min for estimation of fetal weight. Weight estimations and birth weight were plotted on a growth curve to obtain percentiles for comparison. Participants were considered high risk if they had at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, estimated fetal weight \u2265\u200990\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      percentile at the routine third\u2010trimester ultrasound examination, obesity (prepregnancy body mass index \u2265\u200930\u2009kg\/m\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      ) or excessive weight gain during pregnancy. The outcome was the diagnostic performance of each modality in the prediction of birth weight \u2265\u200995\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      percentile, expressed as the area under the receiver\u2010operating\u2010characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 965 women were included, of whom 533 (55.23%) were high risk and 432 (44.77%) were low risk. In the low\u2010risk group, the AUCs for birth weight \u2265\u200995\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      percentile were 0.982 for MRI, 0.964 for 2D\u2010US and 0.962 for 3D\u2010US; pairwise comparisons were non\u2010significant. In the high\u2010risk group, the AUCs were 0.959 for MRI, 0.909 for 2D\u2010US and 0.894 for 3D\u2010US. A statistically significant difference was noted between MRI and both 2D\u2010US (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.002) and 3D\u2010US (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.002), but not between 2D\u2010US and 3D\u2010US (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.503). In the high\u2010risk group, MRI had the highest sensitivity (65.79%) compared with 2D\u2010US (36.84%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.002) and 3D\u2010US (21.05%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), whereas 3D\u2010US had the highest specificity (98.99%) compared with 2D\u2010US (96.77%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.005) and MRI (96.97%,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.004).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      At 36\u2009weeks' gestation, MRI has better performance compared with 2D\u2010US and 3D\u2010US in predicting birth weight \u2265\u200995\n                      <jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup>\n                      percentile in patients at high risk for macrosomia, whereas the performance of 2D\u2010US and 3D\u2010US is comparable. For low\u2010risk patients, the three modalities perform similarly. \u00a9 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.27485","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,19]],"date-time":"2023-09-19T15:25:33Z","timestamp":1695137133000},"page":"489-496","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Prediction of large\u2010for\u2010gestational age at 36\u2009weeks' gestation: two\u2010dimensional ultrasound\n                    <i>vs<\/i>\n                    three\u2010dimensional ultrasound\n                    <i>vs<\/i>\n                    magnetic resonance imaging"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"63","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4177-5526","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"E.","family":"Mazzone","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Brugmann, Universit\u00e9 Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Kadji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Brugmann, Universit\u00e9 Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M. M.","family":"Cannie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology University Hospital Brugmann, Universit\u00e9 Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium"},{"name":"Department of Radiology UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5251-6023","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"D. A.","family":"Badr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Brugmann, Universit\u00e9 Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2252-342X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J. C.","family":"Jani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Brugmann, Universit\u00e9 Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003606"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00005-C"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1203-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00154-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","first-page":"158","article-title":"Macrosomia\u2013maternal characteristics and infant complications","volume":"66","author":"Spellacy WN","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70382-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.12.036"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.674990"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2009.01674.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.15470"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26071"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19073"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-3782(87)90099-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19066"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15780"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00280-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70157-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00249.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.12.1283"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(94)92638-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121374"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2000.079004255.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.219.2.r01ma24567"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00895-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000448950"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.03.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17523"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000453356"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7327"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11185"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.12.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.08.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13517"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027160"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26045"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.638953"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.reprotox.2011.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3945\/jn.112.161158"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000177"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_45_1","volume-title":"Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines","author":"Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02295996"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0006-341X.2000.00345.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5587"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/1740774506cn147oa"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"StockC HielscherT.Comparison of Binary Diagnostic Tests in a Paired Study Design.2014.https:\/\/cran.r\u2010project.org\/web\/packages\/DTComPair\/DTComPair.pdf.","DOI":"10.32614\/CRAN.package.DTComPair"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_52_1","first-page":"46","article-title":"Evaluation of fetal growth by estimation of neonatal body composition","volume":"79","author":"Catalano PM","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(200001\/02)9:1<55::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.150.2.6691115"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00004424-199108000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12458"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.08032"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8945"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.15712"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5253"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.06.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.15397"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.06106"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6378"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0707943"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.302"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.052"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_69_1","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Guideline No. 42. Shoulder dystocia. December2012.https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/guidance\/browse\u2010all\u2010guidance\/green\u2010top\u2010guidelines\/shoulder\u2010dystocia\u2010green\u2010top\u2010guideline\u2010no\u201042\/."}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.27485","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,28]],"date-time":"2024-10-28T07:32:01Z","timestamp":1730100721000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.27485"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,8]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/uog.27485"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.27485","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692","1469-0705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-0705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-05-22","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-09-08","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-03-08","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}