{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T12:04:37Z","timestamp":1769515477998,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,4]],"date-time":"2010-03-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1267660800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstet &amp;amp; Gyne"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate whether the degree of cervical length shortening is valuable in predicting the success of serial induction of labor on the second day in women in whom it failed on the first day, and to compare its performance with that of cervical length.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This was a prospective observational study. We enrolled 92 consecutive women with singleton gestations at &gt; 34.0 weeks' gestation who failed labor induction on the first day of serial induction. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length and determination of the Bishop score were undertaken before performing each labor induction on the first and second days.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The overall success rate of labor induction performed on the second day was 65% (60\/92). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the degree of cervical length shortening and cervical length were significantly associated with the successful induction of labor after adjustment for body mass index, parity, use of prostaglandin and Bishop score. There were no significant differences between areas under the ROC curves for degree of cervical length shortening and cervical length.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The degree of cervical length shortening is valuable in predicting the success of induction of labor on the second day in women in whom induction failed on the first day. However, compared with sonographic cervical length it is no better at predicting the success of subsequent induction of labor. Copyright \u00a9 2010 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7617","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,4]],"date-time":"2010-03-04T11:01:23Z","timestamp":1267700483000},"page":"749-754","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"W. S.","family":"Kang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K. H.","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S. N.","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D. M.","family":"Shin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.\u2010S.","family":"Hong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H. J.","family":"Jung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2002","volume":"52","author":"Martin JA","year":"2003","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","first-page":"120","article-title":"U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989\u20131998","volume":"47","author":"Zhang J","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00259-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2004.12.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199909000-00025"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.3.375"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200312000-00026"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.050"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.32"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000106486"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2007.22.1.89"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6096"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop EH","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.148.3.6878708"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209013646"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","first-page":"40","article-title":"Cervical sonography in preterm labor","volume":"84","author":"Iams JD","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.118655"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_25_2","first-page":"29","volume-title":"Preterm Labor","author":"Romero R","year":"1997"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500127690"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1002%2Fuog.7617","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/uog.7617","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,8]],"date-time":"2023-10-08T14:23:25Z","timestamp":1696775005000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/uog.7617"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/uog.7617"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.7617","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-7692","1469-0705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-7692","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-0705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2010-02-19","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2010-11-24","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}