{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T15:13:16Z","timestamp":1772118796084,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696896000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Veterinary Medicine &amp;amp; Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the performance of automated staple sizes on a cadaveric canine partial gastrectomy model.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Stomachs were transected through the gastric body axis and randomly allocated to two closure groups: Group B, thoracoabdominal (TA) stapler 3.5\u00a0mm staple cartridge (blue); Group G, TA stapler 4.8\u00a0mm staple cartridge (green). After construct completion, leak testing was performed for both groups and compared. Initial leakage pressure (ILP), maximal leakage pressure (MLP) and leakage location were recorded. Staple lines were evaluated by direct observation and fluoroscopy to assess sub\u2010mucosal layer incorporation and staple conformation. Staple shape was classified as optimal or suboptimal. Significance was set at\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      less than 0.5.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Following gastrectomy, the mean double gastric wall thickness was 7.82\u00a0\u00b1\u00a02.05\u00a0mm at the gastric body. Mean ILP was significantly lower in groups G (17.13\u00a0\u00b1\u00a01.19\u00a0mmHg) compared to group B (50.46\u00a0\u00b1\u00a06.03\u00a0mmHg,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.0013). Similarly, mean MLP was significantly lower in group G (21.41 \u00b1\u00a01.39\u00a0mmHg) compared to group B (64.61 \u00b1 10.21\u00a0mmHg,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0&lt;\u00a00.0001). Although group G had higher percentage of B\u2010shaped staple formation compared to group B, this was not significant (group G; 92.38%, group B; 54.56%;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.054).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The 3.5\u00a0mm TA staple cartridge (blue) achieved superior bursting pressures compared with the 4.8\u00a0mm TA staple cartridge (blue) for the closure of a canine partial gastrectomy model. Both staple sizes incorporated all gastric layers. No differences were noticed in optimal staple conformation between groups. In vivo investigation is warranted to evaluate the use of different staple sizes on gastric tissue perfusion, successful healing and post\u2010operative stasis and dehiscence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/vms3.1294","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,12]],"date-time":"2023-10-12T00:45:52Z","timestamp":1697071552000},"page":"2586-2593","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Evaluation of automated staple sizes on gastric layer incorporation and intraluminal pressure for partial gastrectomy closure in an ex vivo canine model"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"Blumenthal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Small Animal Clinical Sciences Department University of Florida  Gainesville Florida USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5886-208X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Judith","family":"Bertran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Small Animal Clinical Sciences Department University of Florida  Gainesville Florida USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Penny","family":"Regier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Small Animal Clinical Sciences Department University of Florida  Gainesville Florida USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Cole","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Small Animal Clinical Sciences Department University of Florida  Gainesville Florida USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8201-040X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elizabeth A","family":"Maxwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Small Animal Clinical Sciences Department University of Florida  Gainesville Florida USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-016-2516-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/ajvr.79.5.576"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1381\/0960892042583888"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foodres.2016.01.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.264"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2982.2007.01061.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","first-page":"305","article-title":"Surgical stapling device\u2013tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes","volume":"7","author":"Chekan E.","year":"2004","journal-title":"Medical Devices (Auckland, NZ)"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0195-5616(94)50153-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.1991.tb00307.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481808400958"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vsu.12428"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vsu.13550"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cvsm.2011.05.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","unstructured":"Ethicon Endo\u2010Surgery Inc. (2022).Manufacturer's instruction for use."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-016-2177-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/javma.238.4.486"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/ajvr.73.11.1819"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15761\/MDDE.1000114"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-015-1705-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5326\/JAAHA-MS-6459"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-009-0899-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9610(73)90018-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vsu.13490"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-1667-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-1527-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-3264-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vsu.13274"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.1995.tb02894.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2018.00056"}],"container-title":["Veterinary Medicine and Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/vms3.1294","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T16:38:18Z","timestamp":1700066298000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/vms3.1294"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/vms3.1294"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/vms3.1294","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.1294\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.1294\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.1294\/v2\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.1294\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.1294\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2053-1095","2053-1095"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2053-1095","type":"print"},{"value":"2053-1095","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-03-27","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-09-22","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-10-10","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}