{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T14:22:58Z","timestamp":1792678978318,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,19]],"date-time":"2022-02-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1645228800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Veterinary Medicine &amp; Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      has been found to be the major cause of foodborne diseases and a serious public health problem in the world, with an increasing concern for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial\u2010resistant strains.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Method<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A cross\u2010sectional study was conducted on poultry and poultry farms in Addis Ababa from February 2016 to April 2016 to determine the occurrence and evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      isolates. A total of 200 samples consisting of the cloacal swab (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a0168), pooled litter (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a012), hand swab (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a08), pooled feed and water (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a012) were collected separately from six poultry farms. The samples were examined for the presence of\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      through culturing on bacteriological media. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's Chi\u2010square (X\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      ) and bivariate logistic regression were used in the analysis of the data. Accordingly, out of 200 samples, 23 (11.50%) were\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      positive, of which 21(12.50%) were in cloacal swab and 2(16.67%) in the pooled litter. There was no statistical association between the bacteriological status of sample type and\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      positivity (X\n                      <jats:sup>2\u00a0<\/jats:sup>\n                      =\u00a03.07,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.545). However, there was a statistical association between farms and the rate of\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      isolation (X\n                      <jats:sup>2\u00a0<\/jats:sup>\n                      =\u00a022.21,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0\u2264\u00a00.00). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing for\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      isolates was conducted following the Kirby\u2013Bauer disc diffusion method (1961).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Out of 23 samples tested, 95.65% of them were resistant to at least one or more antimicrobials. Multiple drug resistances were observed for 69.56% of\n                      <jats:italic>Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n                      isolates. The highest resistance (73.9%) was observed in kanamycin followed by tetracycline (65.2%) and streptomycin (56.3%). gentamycin was the most effective antibiotic (95.7%; sensitivity) followed by ciprofloxacin (78.3% sensitivity) and ampicillin (69.6% sensitivity.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This current study finding indicated that further detailed epidemiological and molecular studies are essential on the frequency and sources of acquisition of resistant genes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1002\/vms3.762","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,19]],"date-time":"2022-02-19T14:27:45Z","timestamp":1645280865000},"page":"1166-1173","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of\n                    <i>Salmonella<\/i>\n                    isolated from poultry farms in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Yasin","family":"Mohammed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Animal Science Mekdela Amba University  Mekdela Ethiopia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7026-6267","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Teshager","family":"Dubie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Veterinary Medicine Samara University  Samara Ethiopia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_11_2_1","first-page":"192","article-title":"Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella strains isolated from raw milk in Sebeta, Ethiopa","volume":"6","author":"Abebe A.","year":"2013","journal-title":"International Journal of Advance Life Science"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_3_1","first-page":"455","article-title":"Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars isolated from poultry meat in Hyderabad, Pakistan","volume":"34","author":"Aijaz H. S.","year":"2010","journal-title":"Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-1605(02)00251-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/S1517-83822006000400020"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_11_6_1","first-page":"133","article-title":"Identification and characterization of Salmonella species in whole egg purchased from local markets in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia","volume":"5","author":"Bayu Z.","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_7_1","first-page":"23","article-title":"Isolation, identification and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella spp. from chicken eggs, intestines and environmental samples","volume":"13","author":"Begum K.","year":"2010","journal-title":"Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/1591816"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/S1517-83822006000300030"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetmic.2004.08.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foodres.2011.11.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_12_1","volume-title":"Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty third informational supplement, CLSI document M100\u2010S23","author":"Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)","year":"2013"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/649541"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_14_1","unstructured":"CSA (Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia)(2008).Report on livestock and livestock characteristics (II: 583). Statistical Bulletin."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_15_1","volume-title":"Microbiological risk assessment series no. 1 risk assessment of Salmonella in eggs and broiler chickens. Interpretative Summary. World Health Organization","author":"FAO","year":"2002"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_16_1","unstructured":"Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2015).Drugs@FDA data files.www.fda.gov\/Drugs\/InformationOnDrugs\/ucm079750"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_17_1","unstructured":"2003 R. K. Gast Paratyphoid infections: Diseases of poultry 583 613"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/fpd.2010.0787"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_19_1","first-page":"18","article-title":"Seroepidemiological studies on poultry salmonellosis and its public health importance","volume":"3","author":"Ibrahim M. A.","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of World's Poultry Research"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ps\/82.4.613"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3855\/jidc.7885"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/650733"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/650733"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3201\/eid1304.060748"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1128\/CMR.00002-11"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_26_1","unstructured":"Maung S. M.(2004).Epidemiology ofSalmonellacontamination of poultry meat products.Knowledge gaps in the farm to store products."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_27_1","unstructured":"National Metrological Service Agency(2002). Year book bulletin."},{"key":"e_1_2_11_28_1","first-page":"832","volume-title":"Manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines","author":"Office International des \u00c9pizooties (OI\u00c9)","year":"2000"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1128\/AAC.48.3.903-908.2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rose et al. (2000).Risk factors for Salmonella persistence after cleansing and disinfection in French broiler\u2010chicken houses Prev.Vet. Med.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-5877(00)00100-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tmaid.2011.11.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tmaid.2011.11.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2334-14-88"},{"key":"e_1_2_11_34_1","first-page":"12","volume-title":"Regional office for Africa \u201cdeveloping and maintaining food safety control systems for Africa current status and prospects for change\u201d.","author":"World Health Organization (WHO)","year":"2004"}],"container-title":["Veterinary Medicine and Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/vms3.762","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1002\/vms3.762","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/vms3.762","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,15]],"date-time":"2023-09-15T11:31:13Z","timestamp":1694777473000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/vms3.762"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,19]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1002\/vms3.762"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/vms3.762","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.762\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.762\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.762\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.762\/v2\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1002\/VMS3.762\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2053-1095","2053-1095"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2053-1095","type":"print"},{"value":"2053-1095","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-02-19","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}