{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,14]],"date-time":"2026-06-14T23:27:57Z","timestamp":1781479677615,"version":"3.54.1"},"publisher-location":"Berlin, Heidelberg","reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Berlin Heidelberg","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783540396253","type":"print"},{"value":"9783540396277","type":"electronic"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,13]],"date-time":"2006-09-13T12:40:30Z","timestamp":1158151230000},"page":"111-123","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":124,"title":["On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Martin","family":"Caminada","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"11_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P.M. Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence\u00a077, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"11_CR2","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-40006-0_17","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"G.A.W. Vreeswijk","year":"2000","unstructured":"Vreeswijk, G.A.W., Prakken, H.: Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics. In: Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L., Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzm\u00e1n, I.P. (eds.) JELIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a01919, pp. 239\u2013253. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)"},{"key":"11_CR3","series-title":"LNAI","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-44652-4_59","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"C. Cayrol","year":"2001","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Doutre, S., Mengin, J.: Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Preferred Semantics of Argumentation Frameworks. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol.\u00a02143, pp. 668\u2013679. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)"},{"key":"11_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510900","volume":"7","author":"H. Prakken","year":"1997","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics\u00a07, 25\u201375 (1997)","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics"},{"key":"11_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/14.5.675","volume":"14","author":"G. Governatori","year":"2004","unstructured":"Governatori, G., Maher, M., Antoniou, G., Billington, D.: Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. Journal of Logic and Computation\u00a014, 675\u2013702 (2004)","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"11_CR6","unstructured":"ASPIC-consortium: Deliverable D2.5: Draft formal semantics for ASPIC system (2005)"},{"key":"11_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1011288805074","volume":"9","author":"J. Horty","year":"2001","unstructured":"Horty, J.: Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law\u00a09, 1\u201328 (2001)","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"11_CR8","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002), Toulouse, France, pp. 91\u201399 (2002)"},{"key":"11_CR9","unstructured":"Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: An axiomatic account of formal argumentation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2005, pp. 608\u2013613 (2005)"},{"key":"11_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. Technical Report UU-CS-2006-023, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2006)","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"11_CR11","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: Contamination in formal argumentation systems. In: Proceedings of the 17th Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC), pp. 59\u201365 (2005)"},{"key":"11_CR12","unstructured":"Verheij, B.: Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. In: Meyer, J.J., van der Gaag, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (NAIC 1996), Utrecht University, Utrecht, pp. 357\u2013368 (1996)"},{"key":"11_CR13","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-30227-8_39","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"S. Doutre","year":"2004","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mengin, J.: On sceptical versus credulous acceptance for abstract argument systems. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS, vol.\u00a03229, pp. 462\u2013473. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)"},{"key":"11_CR14","unstructured":"Dimopoulos, Y., Nebel, B., Toni, F.: Finding Admissible and Preferred Arguments Can be Very Hard. In: Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2000), pp. 53\u201361 (2000)"},{"key":"11_CR15","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Commonsense reasoning. Technical report, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2004) (reader)"},{"key":"11_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0452-6_4","volume-title":"Handbook of Philosophical Logic","author":"A. Urquhart","year":"2001","unstructured":"Urquhart, A.: Basic many-valued logic. In: Gabbay, D., G\u00fcnthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn., vol.\u00a02, pp. 249\u2013295. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)","edition":"2"},{"key":"11_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0452-6_5","volume-title":"Handbook of Philosophical Logic","author":"R. H\u00e4hnle","year":"2001","unstructured":"H\u00e4hnle, R.: Advanced many-valued logic. In: Gabbay, D., G\u00fcnthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn., vol.\u00a02, pp. 297\u2013395. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)","edition":"2"},{"key":"11_CR18","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: For the sake of the Argument. Explorations into argument-based reasoning, Doctoral dissertation Free University, Amsterdam (2004)"},{"issue":"2","key":"11_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/9.2.215","volume":"9","author":"H. Jakobovits","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jakobovits, H., Vermeir, D.: Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. Journal of logic and computation\u00a09(2), 215\u2013261 (1999)","journal-title":"Journal of logic and computation"},{"key":"11_CR20","unstructured":"Vreeswijk, G.A.W.: Studies in defeasible argumentation. PhD thesis at Free University of Amsterdam (1993)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logics in Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/11853886_11","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,21]],"date-time":"2019-04-21T00:33:41Z","timestamp":1555806821000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/11853886_11"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006]]},"ISBN":["9783540396253","9783540396277"],"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11853886_11","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006]]}}}