{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,4]],"date-time":"2024-09-04T22:50:29Z","timestamp":1725490229823},"publisher-location":"Berlin, Heidelberg","reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Berlin Heidelberg","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783540002345"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783540362098"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2002]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-36209-6_44","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,8,28]],"date-time":"2007-08-28T21:14:34Z","timestamp":1188335674000},"page":"532-545","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A Meta-model Framework for Software Process Modeling"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Marcello","family":"Visconti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Curtis R.","family":"Cook","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2002,12,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"44_CR1","unstructured":"R. Basque. CBA IPI: How to build software process improvement success in the evaluation phase?, IEEE Computer Society Software Process Newsletter, 5 (Winter 1996)."},{"issue":"8","key":"44_CR2","first-page":"21","volume":"9","author":"I. Burnstein","year":"1996","unstructured":"I. Burnstein, T. Suwannasart and C. Carlson. Developing a testing maturity model: part I. CrossTalk, 9(8) (1996) 21\u201324","journal-title":"CrossTalk"},{"issue":"9","key":"44_CR3","first-page":"19","volume":"9","author":"I. Burnstein","year":"1996","unstructured":"I. Burnstein, T. Suwannasart and C. Carlson. Developing a testing maturity model: part II. CrossTalk, 9(9) (1996) 19\u201326","journal-title":"CrossTalk"},{"key":"44_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. Bustard, R. Oakes and Z. He. Models to promote effective system change, in Proceedings of International Conference of Software Maintenance, Oxford, UK, September 1999, pp. 297\u2013304","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.1999.792627"},{"key":"44_CR5","unstructured":"C. Cook and M. Visconti. What to do after the assessment report?, in Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1999 (PNSQC, Portland, 1999), pp. 214\u2013228"},{"issue":"1","key":"44_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1670(200003)5:1<55::AID-SPIP111>3.0.CO;2-X","volume":"5","author":"C. Debou","year":"2000","unstructured":"C. Debou and A. Kuntzmann-Combelles. Linking software process improvement to business strategies: experiences from industry. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 5(1) (2000) 55\u201364","journal-title":"Software Process Improvement and Practice"},{"issue":"5","key":"44_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1145\/290249.290268","volume":"23","author":"J. Favaro","year":"1998","unstructured":"J. Favaro and S.L. Pfleeger. Making software development investment decisions. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 23(5) (1998) 69\u201374","journal-title":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"},{"key":"44_CR8","unstructured":"B.S._Ghotra. Software Configuration Management (SCM) Support Process Capability Maturity Model, Master\u2019s Project (Computer Science Department, Oregon State University, 2001)"},{"key":"44_CR9","volume-title":"Successful software process improvement","author":"R. Grady","year":"1997","unstructured":"R. Grady. Successful software process improvement (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1997)"},{"key":"44_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1023\/B:SQJO.0000042057.89615.60","volume":"7","author":"E.M. Gray","year":"1998","unstructured":"E.M. Gray and W.L. Smith. On the limitations of software process assessments and the recognition of a required re-orientation for global process improvement. Software Quality Journal 7 (1998) 21\u201334","journal-title":"Software Quality Journal"},{"key":"44_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. McFeely. IDEAL: a user\u2019s guide for software process improvement. Technical Report CMU\/SEI-96-HB-001 (CMU\/SEI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1996)","DOI":"10.21236\/ADA305472"},{"issue":"4","key":"44_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1109\/52.219617","volume":"10","author":"M. Paulk","year":"1993","unstructured":"M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. Capability Maturity Model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4) (1993) 18\u201327","journal-title":"IEEE Software"},{"key":"44_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Paulk, C. Weber, S. Garcia, M. Chrissis and M. Bush. Key practices of the Capability Maturity Model version 1.1. Technical Report CMU\/SEI-93-TR-025 (CMU\/SEI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1993)","DOI":"10.21236\/ADA263432"},{"issue":"7","key":"44_CR14","first-page":"6","volume":"13","author":"S. Shrum","year":"2000","unstructured":"S. Shrum. Choosing a CMMI Model Representation. CrossTalk, 13(7) (2000) 6\u20137","journal-title":"CrossTalk"},{"key":"44_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1013715203889","volume":"9","author":"J. Trienekens","year":"2001","unstructured":"J. Trienekens, R. Kusters and R. Van Solingen. Product Focused Software Process Improvement: Concepts and Experiences from Industry. Software Quality Journal 9 (2001), 269\u2013281","journal-title":"Software Quality Journal"},{"issue":"3\/4","key":"44_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008979221881","volume":"7","author":"M. Visconti","year":"1998","unstructured":"M. Visconti and C. Cook. Evolution of a maturity model-critical evaluation and lessons learned. Software Quality Journal 7(3\/4) (1998), 223\u2013237","journal-title":"Software Quality Journal"},{"key":"44_CR17","unstructured":"M. Visconti and C. Cook. A meta-model for software process maturity, in Proceedings of FESMA-AEMES Software Measurement Conference 2000, October 2000, Madrid, Spain"},{"key":"44_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Visconti and C. Cook. A meta-model framework for software process modeling, Technical Report 02-60-02, Computer Science Department, Oregon State University, March 2002","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-36209-6_44"},{"issue":"4","key":"44_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.1997.595964","volume":"14","author":"J. Voas","year":"1997","unstructured":"J. Voas. Can clean pipes produce dirty water?. IEEE Software, 14(4) (1997) 93\u201395","journal-title":"IEEE Software"},{"issue":"1","key":"44_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1109\/52.819970","volume":"17","author":"K. Wiegers","year":"2000","unstructured":"K. Wiegers and D. Sturzenberger. A modular software process mini-assessment method. IEEE Software, 17(1) (2000) 62\u201369","journal-title":"IEEE Software"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Product Focused Software Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/3-540-36209-6_44","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,13]],"date-time":"2023-05-13T19:08:39Z","timestamp":1684004919000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/3-540-36209-6_44"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2002]]},"ISBN":["9783540002345","9783540362098"],"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-36209-6_44","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2002]]}}}