{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]],"date-time":"2026-02-24T11:40:35Z","timestamp":1771933235261,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":10,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030011581","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030011598","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-01159-8_16","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,19]],"date-time":"2018-09-19T08:05:51Z","timestamp":1537344351000},"page":"168-175","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Using Twitter Hashtags to Gauge Real-Time Changes in Public Opinion: An Examination of the 2016 US Presidential Election"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Hannah W.","family":"Lee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"16_CR1","unstructured":"Andrews, W., Katz, J., Patel, J.: Latest Election Polls 2016. The New York Times (2016). https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2016\/us\/elections\/polls.html?_r=0%29 . Accessed 23 July 2018"},{"issue":"2","key":"16_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1177\/1461444813480466","volume":"16","author":"A Ceron","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ceron, A., Curini, L., Lacus, S.M., Porro, G.: Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens\u2019 political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media Soc. 16(2), 340\u2013358 (2014)","journal-title":"New Media Soc."},{"key":"16_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chung, J., Mustafaraj, E.: Can collective sentiment expressed on twitter predict political elections? In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1770\u20131771. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2011)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v25i1.8065"},{"issue":"1","key":"16_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1177\/002234336500200104","volume":"2","author":"J Galtung","year":"1965","unstructured":"Galtung, J., Ruge, M.H.: The structure of foreign news. J. Peace Res. 2(1), 64\u201391 (1965)","journal-title":"J. Peace Res."},{"key":"16_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor, B., Balasubramanyan R., Routledge, B.R., Smith N.A.: From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 122\u2013129. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2010)","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v4i1.14031"},{"key":"16_CR6","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67217-5_13","volume-title":"Social Informatics","author":"TA Shaban","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shaban, T.A., Hexter, L., Choi, J.D.: Event analysis on the 2016 U.S. Presidential election using social media. In: Ciampaglia, G.L., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds.) SocInfo 2017. LNCS, vol. 10539, pp. 201\u2013217. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-67217-5_13"},{"key":"16_CR7","unstructured":"Silver, N.: Election update: the how-full-is-this-glass edition. FiveThirtyEight (2017). http:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/election-update-the-how-full-is-this-glass-election\/ . Accessed 23 July 2018"},{"key":"16_CR8","unstructured":"Silver, N.: The real story of 2016. FiveThirtyEight (2017). http:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/the-real-story-of-2016\/ . Accessed 23 July 2018"},{"key":"16_CR9","unstructured":"Silver, N.: The Comey letter probably cost clinton the election. FiveThirtyEight (2017). https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election\/ . Accessed 23 July 2018"},{"key":"16_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 178\u2013185. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2010)","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v4i1.14009"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Social Informatics"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-01159-8_16","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,5]],"date-time":"2023-09-05T06:37:53Z","timestamp":1693895873000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-01159-8_16"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"ISBN":["9783030011581","9783030011598"],"references-count":10,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-01159-8_16","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"assertion":[{"value":"SocInfo","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Social Informatics","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Saint-Petersburg","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Russia","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2018","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"25 September 2018","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"28 September 2018","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"10","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"socinfo2018","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/socinfo2018.hse.ru\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"110","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"30","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"32","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"27% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"3,2","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"2,54","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}}]}}